Skip to main content Accessibility help

Acting Right? Privatization, Encompassing Interests, and the Left

  • Timothy Hicks


I present a theoretical account of the politics of privatization that predicts left-wing support for the policy is conditional on the proportionality of the electoral system. In contrast to accounts that see privatization as an inherently right-wing policy, I argue that, like trade policy, it has the feature of creating distributed benefits and concentrated costs. Less proportional electoral systems create incentives for the Left to be responsive to those who face the concentrated costs, and thus for them to oppose privatization more strongly. More proportional systems reduce these incentives and increase the extent to which distributed benefits are internalized by elected representatives. Hypotheses are derived from this theory at both the individual and macro-policy level, and then tested separately. Quantitative evidence on public opinion from the 1990s and privatization revenues from Western European countries over the period 1980–2005 supports the argument.



Hide All

Timothy Hicks, Lecturer, School of Public Policy, University College London, The Rubin Building, 29/31 Tavistock Square, London ( The author is grateful to Jim Alt, Lucy Barnes, Torben Iversen, Des King, Jonas Pontusson, David Soskice, Anne Wren, and especially David Rueda, for extremely helpful comments at various stages of this project. This paper has also benefited from panel feedback at the MPSA Conference (Chicago, 2009), the conference on “Inequality and Institutions” (Oxford, May 2009), and the SASE Conference (Paris, 2009). I acknowledge IIIS and Nuffield College for providing financial assistance and the Yale Political Science Department for their hospitality.



Hide All
Alexandre, Hervé, and Charreaux, Gerard. 2004. ‘Efficiency of French Privatizations: A Dynamic Vision’. Journal of Corporate Finance 10(3):467494.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1991. ‘Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance’. American Political Science Review 85(2):539556.
Armingeon, Klaus, Leimgruber, Philipp, Beyeler, Michelle, and Menegale, Sarah. 2007. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2004. Bern, Switzerland: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
Armingeon, Klaus, Careja, Romana, Weisstanner, David, Engler, Sarah, Potolidis, Panajotis, and Gerber, Marlène. 2012. Comparative Political Data Set III, 1990–2011. Bern, Switzerland: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
Barbieri, Katherine, Keshk, Omar M.G., and Pollins, Brian M.. 2009. ‘Trading Data: Evaluating Our Assumptions and Coding Rules’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 26(5):471491.
Bartels, Brandon L. 2008. ‘Beyond “Fixed Versus Random Effects”: A Framework for Improving Substantive and Statistical Analysis of Panel, TSCS, and Multilevel Data’. Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Political Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Beck, Nathaniel, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Beardsley, Kyle. 2006. ‘Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy’. International Studies Quarterly 50(1):2744.
Bell, Andrew, and Jones, Kelvyn. 2015. ‘Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data’. Political Science Research and Methods 3(1):133153.
Berry, William D., Golder, Matt, and Milton, Daniel. 2012. ‘Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction’. Journal of Politics 74(3):653671.
Biais, Bruno, and Perotti, Enrico. 2002. ‘Machiavellian Privatization’. American Economic Review 92(1):240258.
Boardman, Anthony E., and Vining, Aidan R.. 1989. ‘Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises’. Journal of Law and Economics 32(1):133.
Boix, Carles. 1997. ‘Privatizing the Public Business Sector in the Eighties: Economic Performance, Partisan Responses and Divided Governments’. British Journal of Political Science 27(4):473496.
Bortolotti, Bernardo, and Siniscalco, Domenico. 2004. The Challenges of Privatization: An International Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bortolotti, Bernardo, Fantini, Marcella, and Siniscalco, Domenico. 2003. ‘Privatisation Around the World: Evidence from Panel Data’. Journal of Public Economics 88(1–2):305332.
Boycko, Maxim, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1996. ‘A Theory of Privatisation’. Economic Journal 106(435):309319.
Christoffersen, Henrik, and Paldam, Martin. 2004. ‘Privatization in Denmark, 1980–2002’. Working Paper No. 1127, CESifo, Ifo Institute -- Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dewenter, Kathryn L., and Malatesta, Paul H.. 2001. ‘State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity’. American Economic Review 91(1):320334.
D’Souza, Juliet, and Megginson, William L.. 1999. ‘The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms During the 1990s’. Journal of Finance 54(4):13971438.
Durant, Robert F., and Legge, Jerome S. Jr. 2001. ‘Politics, Public Opinion, and Privatization: A Test of Competing Theories in Great Britain’. Public Organization Review 1(1):7595.
Durant, Robert F., and Legge, Jerome S. Jr. 2002. ‘Politics, Public Opinion, and Privatization in France: Assessing the Calculus of Consent for Market Reforms’. Public Administration Review 62(3):307323.
Ehrlich, Isaac, Gallais-Hamonno, Georges, Liu, Zhiqiang, and Lutter, Randall. 1994. ‘Productivity Growth and Firm Ownership: An Analytical and Empirical Investigation’. Journal of Political Economy 102(5):10061038.
Feigenbaum, Harvey B., and Henig, Jeffrey R.. 1994. ‘The Political Underpinnings of Privatization: A Typology’. World Politics 46(2):185208.
Florio, Massimo. 2003. ‘Does Privatisation Matter? The Long-Term Performance of British Telecom Over 40 Years’. Fiscal Studies 24(2):197234.
Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2002. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2007. ‘Context Matters: The Challenges of Multicausality, Context-Conditionality, and Endogeneity for Empirical Evaluation of Positive Theory in Comparative Politics’. In: Carles Boix and Susan Stokes (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Chapter 2, 2772. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Franzese, Robert J. Jr., and Hays, Jude C.. 2007. ‘Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data’. Political Analysis 15(2):140164.
Gallagher, Michael. 1991. ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems’. Electoral Studies 10(1):3351.
Gingrich, Jane R. 2011. Making Markets in the Welfare State: The Politics of Varying Market Reforms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
González-Páramo, José Manuel, and Hernández de Cos, Pablo. 2005. ‘The Impact of Public Ownership and Competition on Productivity’. Kyklos 58(4):495517.
Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Henisz, Witold J., Zelner, Bennet A., and Guillén, Mauro F.. 2005. ‘The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999’. American Sociological Review 70(6):871897.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. ‘Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy’. American Political Science Review 71(4):14671487.
Hicks, Timothy. 2013. ‘Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden’. Comparative Politics 45(2):207226.
Hicks, Timothy. 2015. ‘Inequality, marketisation, and the left: Schools policy in England and Sweden’. European Journal of Political Research 54(2):326342.
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. ‘Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others’. American Political Science Review 100(2):165181.
Iversen, Torben, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. ‘Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation’. Comparative Political Studies 41(4–5):600637.
Katzenstein, Peter J.. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
King, Desmond S. 1987. The New Right: Politics, Markets and Citizenship. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen. 2008. ‘School Vouchers and the New Politics of the Welfare State’. Governance 21(4):479498.
Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 2005. ‘The Impact of Sector Employment on Party Choice: A Comparative Study of Eight West European Countries’. European Journal of Political Research 44(4):593621.
Kole, Stacey R., and Mulherin, J. Harold. 1997. ‘The Government as a Shareholder: A Case from the United States’. Journal of Law and Economics 40(1):122.
Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2009. ‘Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis’. American Journal of Political Science 53(4):821837.
Lindvall, Johannes. 2009. ‘The Real But Limited Influence of Expert Ideas’. World Politics 61(4):703730.
Lohmann, Susanne, and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. ‘Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence’. International Organization 48(4):595632.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. ‘Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?’. European Economic Review 49(6):13931430.
Megginson, William L., and Netter, Jeffry M.. 2001. ‘From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization’. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2):321389.
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2004. ‘What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries’. Journal of Public Policy 24(3):299325.
Meth-Cohn, Delia, and Müller, Wolfgang C.. 1994. ‘Looking Reality in the Eye: The Politics of Privatization in Austria’. In: Vincent Wright (ed.), Privatization in Western Europe: Pressures, Problems and Paradoxes, Chapter 8, 160179. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Milner, Helen V., and Judkins, Benjamin. 2004. ‘Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is there a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?International Studies Quarterly 48(1):95120.
Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Newbery, David M., and Pollitt, Michael G.. 1997. ‘The Restructuring and Privatisation of Britain’s CEGB—Was It Worth It?’. Journal of Industrial Economics 45(3):269303.
Nickell, Stephen J. 1996. ‘Competition and Corporate Performance’. Journal of Political Economy 104(4):724746.
Obinger, Herbert, Schmitt, Carina, and Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2014. ‘Partisan Politics and Privatization in OECD Countries’. Comparative Political Studies 47(9):12941323.
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2005. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Phelan, William. 2011. ‘Open International Markets Without Exclusion: Encompassing Domestic Political Institutions, International Organization, and Self-Contained Regimes’. International Theory 3(2):286306.
Pint, Ellen M. 1991. ‘Nationalization Vs. Regulation of Monopolies: The Effects of Ownership on Efficiency’. Journal of Public Economics 44(2):131164.
Plümper, Thomas, and Neumayer, Eric. 2010. ‘Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence’. European Journal of Political Research 49(3):418442.
Pontusson, Jonas. 1989. ‘The Triumph of Pragmatism: Nationalisation and Privatisation in Sweden’. In: John Vickers and Vincent Wright (eds), The Politics of Privatisation in Western Europe, Chapter 9, 129140. London, UK: Frank Cass.
Pontusson, Jonas. 1991. ‘Labor, Corporatism, and Industrial Policy: The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective’. Comparative Politics 23(2):163179.
Robinson, James A., and Torvik, Ragnar. 2005. ‘White Elephants’. Journal of Public Economics 89(2–3):197210.
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’. International Organization 41(2):203223.
Rueda, David. 2005. ‘Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties’. American Political Science Review 99(1):6174.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. ‘What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?’. Journal of International Economics 54(2):267292.
Schmitt, Carina. 2011. ‘What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector’. Journal of Public Policy 31(1):95117.
Schmitt, Carina. 2014. ‘The Employment Effects of Privatizing Public Utilities in OECD Countries’. Public Management Review 16(8):11641183.
Schneider, Volker, Fink, Simon, and Tenbucken, Marc. 2005. ‘Buying Out the State: A Comparative Perspective on the Privatization of Infrastructures’. Comparative Political Studies 38(6):704727.
Schulten, Thorsten, Brandt, Torsten, and Hermann, Christoph. 2008. ‘Liberalisation and Privatization of Public Services and Strategic Options for European Trade Unions’. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 14(2):295311.
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60(4):781810.
Vining, Aidan R., and Boardman, Anthony E.. 1992. ‘Ownership Versus Competition: Efficiency in Public Enterprise’. Public Choice 73(2):205239.
Weingast, Barry R., Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Johnsen, Christopher. 1981. ‘The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics’. Journal of Political Economy 89(4):642664.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Obinger, Herbert, and Wolf, Frieder. 2008. ‘Partisan Politics, Globalization, and the Determinants of Privatization Proceeds in Advanced Democracies (1990–2000)’. Governance 21(1):95121.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Hicks et al datasets


Acting Right? Privatization, Encompassing Interests, and the Left

  • Timothy Hicks


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.