Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies

  • Lena Schaffer and Gabriele Spilker

Abstract

Literature on the compensation hypothesis overwhelmingly concentrates on either the macro or micro level of the relationship between globalization and welfare spending. This paper explicitly addresses this shortcoming by using individual citizens and country-specific characteristics in a hierarchical model framework. We start by examining individual’s context-conditional reactions to actual economic globalization and welfare generosity; after which, we make the effect of actual economic globalization (welfare generosity) conditional on whether the individual is a globalization winner or loser. In contrast to theoretical expectations, our results indicate that actual economic globalization does not affect people’s perception in the manner expected by the compensation hypothesis. However, individuals display more positive attitudes toward globalization if welfare state generosity is proxied using government spending on active labor market programs.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
*

Lena Schaffer Postdoctoral Researcher, ETH Zürich, Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) (schaffer@ir.gess.ethz.ch); Gabriele Spilker, Assistant Professor of International Politics, University of Salzburg (gabriele.spilker@sbg.ac.at).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Achen, Christopher. 2005. ‘Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis’. Political Analysis 13(4):447456.
Baker, Andy. 2008. ‘Public Opinion and the Compensation Hypothesis’. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, November 14--15, 2008. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam. 2014. ‘Preferences Toward International Redistribution: The Divide Over the Eurozone Bailouts’. American Journal of Political Science 58:835856.
Boix, Carles. 2004. ‘Between Redistribution and Trade: The Political Economy of Protectionism and Compensation’. In P. K. Bardhan, S. Bowles and M. Wallerstein (eds), Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Brady, David, Beckfield, Jason, and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin. 2005. ‘Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001’. American Sociological Review 70:921948.
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. ‘Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind’. International Organization 55(3):509551.
Burgoon, Brian, and Hiscox, Michael. 2008. ‘The Gender Divide Over International Trade: Why Do Men and Women Have Different Views About Openness to the World Economy’? Working Paper, SSRN. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Carpini, Michael X.D., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. ‘Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First’. American Journal of Political Science 37(4):11791206.
Carpini, Michael X.D., and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2005. ‘Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution’. Discussion Paper No. SP II 2005–15, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin.
Down, Ian. 2007. ‘Trade Openness, Country Size and Economic Volatility: The Compensation Hypothesis Revisited’. Business and Politics 9(2):120.
Dreher, Axel. 2006. ‘Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization’. Applied Economics 38(10):10911110.
Dreher, Axel, Sturm, Jan-Egbert, and Ursprung, Heinrich. 2008. ‘The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures: Evidence from Panel Data’. Public Choice 134(3):263292.
The Economist. 2009. ‘The Return of Economic Nationalism’. The Economist, 5 February, Available at http://www.economist.com/node/13061443, accessed 26 March 2009.
Ehrlich, Sean D., and Hearn, Eddie. 2013. ‘Does Compensating the Losers Increase Support for Trade? An Experimental Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10(2):116.
Eurobarometer. 2004. ‘Standard Eurobarometer Survey’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/standard_en.htm, accessed 26 March 2009.
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2008. ‘Economic Interests and Public Support for American Global Activism’. International Organization 62(1):163182.
Fordham, Benjamin O., and Kleinberg, Katja B.. 2012. ‘How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade?’. International Organization 66(2):311328.
Galston, William. 2001. ‘Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education’. Annual Review of Political Science 4(1):217234.
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Mitchell, Deborah. 2001. ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’. European Journal of Political Research 39(2):145177.
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Genschel, Philipp. 2004. ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: A Retrospective’. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4):613636.
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2006. ‘Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade’. International Organization 60(2):469498.
Hays, Jude. 2009. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hays, Jude, Ehrlich, Sean, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’. International Organization 59(2):473494.
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, and Aten, Bettina. 2006. ‘Penn World Table Version 6.2’. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane. 1992. ‘Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies’. American Political Science Review 86(3):658674.
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John. 1993. ‘Social Democracy, Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State’. American Journal of Sociology 99(3):711749.
Iversen, Torben, and Cusack, Thomas. 2000. ‘The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?World Politics 52(3):313349.
Kittel, Bernhard, and Winner, Hannes. 2005. ‘How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited’. European Journal of Political Research 44(2):269293.
Leoni, Eduardo. 2010. ‘Analyzing Multiple Surveys: Results from Monte Carlo Experiments’. Available at http://eduardoleoni.com/.
Mansfield, Edward, and Mutz, Diana. 2009. ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety’. International Organization 63(3):425457.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. ‘Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?’. European Economic Review 49(6):13931430.
Meinhard, Stephanie, and Potrafke, Niklas. 2012. ‘The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Reconsidered’. Review of International Economics 20(2):271287.
Oatley, Thomas. 2010. International Political Economy. Boston, MA: Longman.
Pierson, Paul. 2001. ‘Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States’. In P. Pierson, (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, 80–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plümper, Thomas, Tröger, Vera, and Manow, Philip. 2005. ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory’. European Journal of Political Research 44(2):327354.
Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. ‘Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries’. Public Choice 140(1–2):105124.
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Skrondal, Anders. 2009. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. ‘Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis’. Comparative Political Studies 42(7):855881.
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. ‘Why Do More Open Economies have Bigger Governments?’. Journal of Political Economy 106(5):9971032.
Ruggie, John G. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism and the Post-War Economic Regimes’. International Organization 36(2):195232.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. ‘What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?’. Journal of International Economics 54(2):267292.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2004. ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’. American Journal of Political Science 48(4):662674.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2006. ‘Public Opinion, International Economic Integration, and the Welfare State’. In Pranab, K. Bardhan, Samuel Bowles and Michael Wallerstein (eds), Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution, 217260. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. ‘The Limited Effect of Economic Self-Interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public’. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(3):247271.
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. ‘Modeling Multilevel Data Structures’. American Journal of Political Science 46(1):218237.
Walter, Stefanie. 2010. ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundation of the Compensation Hypothesis’. International Studies Quarterly 54(2):403426.
World Bank. 2006. ‘World Development Indicators’. Available at http://go. worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40, accessed 26 March 2009.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed