Skip to main content

An intra-party account of electoral system choice

  • Valentin Schröder (a1) and Philip Manow (a1)

We present an intra-party account of electoral reform, contrasting the incentives of legislators (MPs) with those of party leaders. We develop our argument along the switch to proportional representation (PR) in early 20th century Europe. District-level electoral alliances allowed bourgeois MPs to counter the “socialist threat” under the electoral systems in place. PR was thus unnecessary from the seat-maximizing perspective that dominates previous accounts—intra-party considerations were crucial: candidate nomination and legislative cohesion. We show our argument to hold empirically both for the prototypical case of Germany, 1890–1920, using encompassing district-level data on candidatures, elections, electoral alliances, roll call votes and a series of simulations on reform effects; and for the implementation of electoral reforms in 29 countries, 1900–31.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Ahmed, A (2013) Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, M (2000) Die Freikonservative Partei 1890–1918: Gemäßigter Konservatismus in der konstitutionellen Monarchie. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Anderson, ML (2000) Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany. Princeton/NJ: Princeton University Press.
Andrews, JT and Jackman, RW (2005) Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice under Extreme Uncertainty. Electoral Studies 24(1), 6584.
Benoit, K (2004) Models of Electoral System Change. Electoral Studies 23(3), 363389.
Blais, A, Dobrzynska, A and Indridason, IH (2005) To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice. British Journal of Political Science 35, 182190.
Boix, C (1999) Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies. American Political Science Review 93(3), 609624.
Boix, C (2010) Electoral Markets, Party Strategies, and Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 104(2), 404413.
Braunias, K (1932) Das parlamentarische Wahlrecht: Ein Handbuch über die Bildung der gesetzgebenden Körperschaften in Europa. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Callander, S (2005a) Duverger’s Hypothesis, the Run-off Rule, and Electoral Competition. Political Analysis 13(3), 209232.
Callander, S (2005b) Electoral Competition in Heterogeneous Districts. Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 11161145.
Calvo, E (2009) The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation: Partisan Biases and Electoral Regime Change under Increasing Party Competition. World Politics 61(2), 254295.
Campbell, PW (1965) French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. 2nd ed. London: Faber.
Carey, JM (2007) Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51(1), 92107.
Carey, JM (2009) Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge/England: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, JM and Hix, S (2011) The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 55(2), 383397.
Carey, JM and Shugart, MS (1995) Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14(4), 417439.
Carstairs, AML (1980) A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Colomer, JM (2005) It’s Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down). Political Studies 53(1), 121.
Colomer, JM (2011) Introduction: Personal and Party Representation. In JM Colomer (Ed.), Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems, 120. Colchester/England: ECPR Press.
Cox, GW (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral System. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, GW (2006) The Organization of Democratic Legislatures. In BR Weingast and RE Goodin (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, 141161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cox, GW, Fiva, JH and Smith, DM (Forthcoming) Parties, Legislators, and the Origins of Proportional Representation. Comparative Political Studies, 142.
Cusack, T, Iversen, T and Soskice, D (2007) Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems. American Political Science Review 101(3), 373391.
Cusack, T, Iversen, T and Soskice, D (2010) Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems. American Political Science Review 104(2), 393403.
Dewan, T and Spirling, A (2011) Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies. American Political Science Review 105(2), 337358.
Diermeier, D and Vlaicu, R (2011) Parties, Coalitions, and the Internal Organization of Legislatures. American Political Science Review 105(2), 359380.
Duverger, M (1955) Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
Ergun, SJ (2010) From Plurality Rule to Proportional Representation. Economics of Governance 11(4), 373408.
Fairbairn, B (1997) Democracy in the Undemocratic State: The German Reichstag Elections of 1898 and 1903. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hartenstein, W (1962) Die Anfänge der Deutschen Volkspartei 1918–1920. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Indridason, IH (2008) Competition & Turnout: The Majority Run-off as a Natural Experiment. Electoral Studies 27(4), 699710.
Kam, CJ (2014) Party Discipline. In S Martin, T Saalfeld and K Strøm (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, 399417. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1993) The Evolution of Party Organization in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics 14(4), 593617.
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1(1), 528.
Kedar, O, Harsgor, L and Sheinerman, RA (2016) Are Voters Equal Under Proportional Representation? American Journal of Political Science 60(3), 676691.
Kiewiet, DR and McCubbins, MD (1991) Delegation and Agency Problems. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process, 2238. Chicago: University Press.
Kreuzer, M (2003) Parliamentarization and the Question of German Exceptionalism: 1867–1918. Central European History 36(3), 327357.
Kreuzer, M (2010) Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 104(2), 369392.
Laakso, M and Taagepera, R (1979) “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1), 327.
Lachapelle, G (1913) La représentation proportionelle en France et en Belgique 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan.
Laver, M and Shepsle, KA (1999) How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments. In S Bowler, DM Farrell and RS Katz (Ed.), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, 2348. Columbus/OH: Ohio State University Press.
Leemann, L and Mares, I (2014) The Adoption of Proportional Representation. Journal of Politics 76(2), 461478.
Leyenaar, M and Hazan, RY (2011) Reconceptualising Electoral Reform. West European Politics 34(3), 437455.
Liebe, W (1956) Die Deutschnationale Volkspartei 1918–1924. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Lijphart, A (1992) Democratization and Constitutional Choices in Czecho-Slovaki, Hungary and Poland 1989–91. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(2), 207223.
Maier, C (1975) Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany, and Italy in the Decade after World War I. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Manow, P (2011) The Cube Rule in a Mixed Electoral System: Disproportionality in German Bundestag Elections. West European Politics 34(4), 773794.
Martin, S (2011) Electoral Institutions, the Personal Vote, and Legislative Organization. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(3), 339361.
Matakos, K and Xefteris, D (2015) Strategic Electoral Rule Choice under Uncertainty. Public Choice 162(3–4), 329350.
Matthias, E (1969) Einleitung. In: S Miller and H Potthoff (Ed.), Die Regierung der Volksbeauftragten 1918/19. vol. 1, xv-cxxx. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Matthias, E and Pikart, E (1966) Bemerkungen zur Praxis der Kandidatenaufstellung und zur Frage einer “wirklich proletarischen Repräsentation”. In E Matthias and P Eberhard (Ed.), Die Reichstagsfraktion der deutschen Sozialdemokratie 1898 bis 1918 vol. 1, lxviixc. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Meyer, G and Jellinek, G (1901) Das Parlamentarische Wahlrecht. Berlin: O. Häring.
Mezdeg, G and Nohlen, D (1969) Frankreich. In D Sternberger and B Vogel (Ed.), Die Wahl der Parlamente und anderer Staatsorgane vol. 1, 441554. Europa. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Michels, R (1957[1925]) Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der moderen Demokratie: Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Kröner.
Miller, S (1978) Die Bürde der Macht: Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie 1918–1920. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Nipperdey, T (1961) Die Organisation der deutschen Parteien vor 1918. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Nohlen, D (2010) France. In D Nohlen and P Stöver (Ed.), Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook vol, 639721. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Noiret, S (1994) La nascità del sistema dei partiti nell’Italia contemporanea: la proporzionale del 1919. Rome: Laicaita.
Nunez, L and Jacobs, KTE (2016) Catalysts and Barriers: Explaining Electoral Reform in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 55(3), 454473.
Ostrogorski, M (1964[1902]) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Doubleday.
Palfrey, TR (1984) Spatial Equilibrium with Entry. Review of Economic Studies 51(1), 139156.
Rahat, G and Hazan, RY (2011) The Barriers to Electoral System Reform: A Synthesis of Alternative Approaches. West European Politics 34(3), 478494.
Raymond, C (2016) Explaining the Multiparty Systems of Western Europe Prior to the Adoption of Proportional Representation. Comparative European Politics 14(3), 253272.
Reibel, C-W (2011) Bündnis und Kompromiss: Parteienkooperation im Deutschen Kaiserreich 1890–1918. Historische Zeitschrift 293(1), 71114.
Reibel, C-W(B) (2007) Handbuch der Reichstagswahlen 1890–1918: Bündnisse, Ergebnisse, Kandidaten. Düsseldorf: Droste.
Renwick, A (2010) The Politics of Electoral Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, SA (1925) The Behavior of Legislative Groups. Political Science Quarterly 40(1), 6072.
Riker, WH (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ritter, GA (2002) Die Reichstagswahlen und die Wurzeln der deutschen Demokratie im Kaiserreich. Historische Zeitschrift 275(2), 385403.
Rogowski, R (1987) Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions. International Organization 41(2), 203223.
Rokkan, S (2009[1970]) Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study to the Process of Development. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Saalfeld, T (1995) On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes. In H Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, 528566. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Saalfeld, T and Strøm, K (2014) Political Parties and Legislators. In S Martin, T Saalfeld and K Strøm (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, 371398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C (1998) Parties and Interests in the ‘Marriage of Iron and Rye’. In, British Journal of Political Science 28, 291332.
Shepsle, KA and Weingast, BR (1981) Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization. American Journal of Political Science 25(1), 96111.
Sieberer, U (2006) Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2), 150178.
Tiemann, G (2015) Local Districts, National Contexts, and the Number of Parties. West European Politics 38(1), 123144.
Weingast, BR (1979) A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms. American Journal of Political Science 23(2), 245262.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Schröder and Manow Dataset



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed