Skip to main content

Attitudes Toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement

  • Rasmus T. Pedersen and Diana C. Mutz

Recent studies of attitudes toward economic inequality suggest that most people around the world prefer very low levels of inequality, despite well-known trends toward greater inequality within many countries. Even within countries, people across the political spectrum are said to be in remarkable agreement about the ideal level of economic inequality. Using survey data from 40 countries and a novel survey experiment in the United States, we show that this apparent agreement is illusory. When relying on a widely used cross-national survey measure of Ideal Pay Ratios, preferred levels of inequality are heavily influenced by two well-documented sources of perceptual distortion: the anchoring effect and ratio bias. These effects are substantial and many times larger than the influence of fundamental political predispositions. As a result, these cross-national survey measures tapping preferences regarding economic inequality produce misleading conclusions about desired levels of inequality.

Hide All

Rasmus T. Pedersen is a Senior Researcher at VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, Copenhagen, Denmark ( Diana C. Mutz is a Professor in the Department of Political Science and Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 208 S. 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6215 ( This work was supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research [grant number 12-127749]. The authors acknowledge helpful feedback from anonymous reviewers as well as Eunji Kim. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Hide All
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Meredith, Marc, and Snowberg, Erik. 2013. ‘Asking About Numbers: Why and How’. Political Analysis 21:4869.
Arian, Asher, and Shamir, Michal. 1983. ‘The Primarily Political Functions of the Left-Right Continuum’. Comparative Politics 15:139158.
Ariely, Dan, Loewenstein, George, and Prelec, Drazen. 2003. ‘“Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:73106.
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind’. Perspectives on Politics 3:1531.
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. ‘Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk’. Political Analysis 20:351368.
Bonner, Carissa, and Newell, Ben R.. 2008. ‘How to Make a Risk Seem Riskier: The Ratio Bias Versus Construal Level Theory’. Judgment and Decision Making 3:411416.
Burak, Esra. 2013. ‘The Social Maximum: American Attitudes Toward Extremely High Incomes’. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 31:97114.
Burson, Katherine A., Larrick, Richard P., and Lynch, John G. Jr. 2009. ‘Six of One, Half Dozen of the Other: Expanding and Contracting Numerical Dimensions Produces Preference Reversals’. Psychological Science 20:10741078.
Choi, James J., Haisley, Emily, Kurkoski, Jennifer, and Massey, Cade. 2012. Small Cues Change Savings Choices. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. ‘The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications’. American Journal of Political Science 25:617645.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1984. ‘How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model’. American Journal of Political Science 28:95126.
Cox, Nicholas J. 2008. ‘Speaking Stata: Correlation With Confidence, or Fisher’s z Revisited’. Stata Journal 8:413439.
Critcher, Clayton R., and Gilovich, Thomas. 2008. ‘Incidental Environmental Anchors’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21:241251.
Denes-Raj, Veronika, and Epstein, Seymour. 1994. ‘Conflict Between Intuitive and Rational Processing: When People Behave Against Their Better Judgment’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:819829.
Denes-Raj, Veronika, Epstein, Seymour, and Cole, Jonathan. 1995. ‘The Generality of the Ratio-Bias Phenomenon’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21:10831092.
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. ‘Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values’. American Journal of Political Science 32:416440.
Feldman, Stanley, and Johnston, Christopher. 2014. ‘Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity’. Political Psychology 35:337358.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1921. ‘On the Probable Error of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample’. Metron 1:332.
Furnham, Adrian, and Boo, Hua Chu. 2011. ‘A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect’. The Journal of Socio-Economics 40:3542.
International Social Survey Programme (ISSP). 2012. ‘Social Inequality IV, GESIS Variable Report 2012/307’. Cologne: GESIS.
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2015. ‘Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies’. Comparative Political Studies 48:17811813.
Kaustia, Markku, Alho, Eeva, and Puttonen, Vesa. 2008. ‘How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates’. Financial Management 37:391411.
Kelley, Jonathan, and Evans, Mariah D. R.. 1993. ‘The Legitimation of Inequality: Occupational Earnings in Nine Nations’. American Journal of Sociology 22:75125.
Kelley, Jonathan, and Zagorski, Krzysztof. 2004. ‘Economic Change and the Legitimation og Inequality: The Transition from Socialism to the Free Market in Central-East Europe’. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 22:319364.
Kiatpongsan, Sorapop, and Norton, Michael I.. 2014. ‘How Much (More) Should CEOs Make? A Universal Desire for More Equal Pay’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9:587593.
Kirkpatrick, Lee A., and Epstein, Seymour. 1992. ‘Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory and Subjective Probability: Further Evidence for Two Conceptual Systems’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:534544.
Luttig, Matthew. 2013. ‘The Structure of Inequality and Americans’ Attitudes Toward Redistribution’. Public Opinion Quarterly 77:811821.
McCall, Leslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McClosky, Herbert, and Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Northcraft, Gregory B., and Neale, Margaret A.. 1987. ‘Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring-and-Adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39:8497.
Norton, Michael I., and Ariely, Dan. 2011. ‘Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6:912.
Okan, Yasmina, Cokely, Rocio Garcia-Retamero Edward T., and Maldonado, Antonio. 2012. ‘Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25:390401.
Osberg, Lars, and Smeeding, Timothy. 2006. ‘“Fair” Inequality? Attitudes Toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective’. American Sociological Review 71:450473.
Pandelaere, Mario, Briers, Barbara, and Lembregts, Christophe. 2011. ‘How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons’. Journal of Consumer Research 38:308322.
Pedersen, Rasmus T. 2017. ‘Ratio Bias and Policy Preferences: How Equivalence Framing of Numbers Can Affect Attitudes’. Political Psychology 38:11031120.
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2001. Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998 (Series Updated to 2000 available). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2006. The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Plous, Scott. 1989. ‘Thinking the Unthinkable: The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear War1’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19:6791.
Rekker, Roderik, Keijsers, Loes, Branje, Susan, and Meeus, Wim. 2017. ‘The Dynamics of Political Identity and Issue Attitudes in Adolescence and Early Adulthood’. Electoral Studies 46:101111.
Reyna, Valerie F., and Brainerd, Charles J.. 2008. ‘Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability’. Learning and Individual Differences 18:89107.
Shariff, Azim F., Wiwad, Dylan, and Aknin, Lara B.. 2016. ‘Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality Cross-National and Experimental Evidence’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11:373380.
Shaw, Greg M., and Gaffey, Laura. 2012. ‘Trends: American Public Opinion on Economic Inequality, Taxes, and Mobility: 1990–2011’. Public Opinion Quarterly 76:576596.
Simmons, Joseph P., LeBoeuf, Robyn A., and Nelson, Leif D.. 2010. ‘The Effect of Accuracy Motivation on Anchoring and Adjustment: Do People Adjust from Provided Anchors?’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99:917932.
Strack, Fritz, and Mussweiler, Thomas. 1997. ‘Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:437446.
Svallfors, Stefan. 1993. ‘Dimensions of Inequality: A Comparison of Attitudes in Sweden and Britain’. European Sociological Review 9:267287.
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. ‘Words of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’. European Sociological Review 13:283304.
Trump, Kris-Stella. 2014. ‘Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences’. British Journal of Political Science (First View), 1–24.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’. Science 185:11241131.
Wu, Chin-Shan, and Cheng, Fei-Fei. 2011. ‘The Joint Effect of Framing and Anchoring on Internet Buyers’ Decision-Making’. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10:358368.
Yamagishi, Kimihiko. 1997. ‘When a 12.86% Mortality is More Dangerous Than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication’. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11:495506.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Pedersen and Mutz supplemantary material 1

 PDF (257 KB)
257 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 503 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st May 2018 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.