Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations

  • Albert Falcó-Gimeno (a1) and Pablo Fernandez-Vazquez (a2)

Abstract

This paper examines how a party’s decision to enter a coalition government affects voter perceptions of the party’s policy position. We argue that, for the decision to change voter beliefs, it must be at odds with voters’ prior opinions about the party. Specifically, the party must join a coalition that is not the one voters perceive as the ideologically closest option. Otherwise, the party’s action simply confirms voters’ pre-existing beliefs. Hence, whether or not joining a coalition alters voter attitudes depends on the type of alternative coalitions the party could enter. We test the hypothesis using three complementary empirical strategies: a cross-country analysis of party reputations in five coalition-prone European countries, individual panel data, and a quasi-experimental test. All three empirical tests provide support for our claim. This paper contributes to our understanding of voter information processing, coalition politics, and party competition.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: pablo.fernandez@pitt.edu

References

Hide All
Adams, J (2012) Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1), 401419.10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-101450
Adams, J, Ezrow, LLeiter, D (2012) Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe. West European Politics 35(6), 12721294.10.1080/01402382.2012.713746
Adams, J, Ezrow, LSomer-Topcu, Z (2011) Is Anybody Listening? Evidence that Voters do not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Programmes. American Journal of Political Science 55(2), 370382.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00489.x
Adams, J, Ezrow, LWleizen, C (2016) The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements. American Journal of Political Science 60(4), 811823.10.1111/ajps.12231
Alesina, ARosenthal, H (1989) Partisan Cycles in Congressional Elections and the Macroeconomy. American Political Science Review 83(02), 373398.10.2307/1962396
Alesina, ARosenthal, H (1995) Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720512
Allern, EHAylott, N (2009) Overcoming the Fear of Commitment: Pre-electoral Coalitions in Norway and Sweden. Acta Politica 44(3), 259285.10.1057/ap.2009.1
Armstrong, DADuch, R (2010) Why Can Voters Anticipate Post-election Coalition Formation Likelihoods? Electoral Studies 29(3), 308315.10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.007
Bargsted, MAKedar, O (2009) Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science 53(2), 307323.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00372.x
Benoit, KLaver, M (2012) The Dimensionality of Political Space: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations. European Union Politics 13(2), 194218.10.1177/1465116511434618
Benoit, K, Laver, MMikhaylov, S (2009) Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions. American Journal of Political Science 53(2), 495513.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00383.x
Brambor, T, Willam, RCGolder, M (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14(1), 6382.10.1093/pan/mpi014
Bräuninger, T (2005) A Partisan Model of Government Expenditure. Public Choice 125(3-4), 409429.10.1007/s11127-005-3055-x
Clinton, JD (2012) Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 7999.10.1146/annurev-polisci-043010-095836
Clinton, J, Jackman, SRivers, D (2004) The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review 98(2), 355370.10.1017/S0003055404001194
Cusack, TR (1997) Partisan Politics and Public Finance: Changes in Public Spending in the Industrialized Democracies, 1955–1989. Public choice 91(3-4), 375395.10.1023/A:1004995814758
Dalton, RJMcAllister, I (2015) Random Walk or Planned Excursion? Continuity and Change in the Left-Right Positions of Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies 48(6), 759787.10.1177/0010414014558257
D Carpini, MXKeeter, S (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Duch, RM, May, JArmstrong, DA (2010) Coalition-Directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies. American Political Science Review 104(04), 698719.10.1017/S0003055410000420
Falcó-Gimeno, AJurado, I (2011) Minority Governments and Budget Deficits: The role of the Opposition. European Journal of Political Economy 27(3), 554565.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.03.002
Falcó-Gimeno, AMuñoz, J (2017) Show Me Your Friends: A Survey Experiment on the Effect of Coalition Signals. The Journal of Politics 79(4), 14541459.10.1086/693369
Fernandez-Vazquez, P (2014) And Yet It Moves The Effect of Election Platforms on Party Policy Images. Comparative Political Studies 47(14), 19191944.10.1177/0010414013516067
Fortunato, D (2017) ‘The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy-Making.’ British Journal of Political Science doi:10.1017/S0007123416000430.
Fortunato, DAdams, J (2015) How Voters’ Perceptions of Junior Coalition Partners Depend on the Prime Minister’s Position. European Journal of Political Research 54(3), 601621.10.1111/1475-6765.12094
Fortunato, D, Lin, NStevenson, RT (2014) Political Knowledge in Coalition Democracies. Unpublished Manuscript, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. http://www.randystevenson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/knowledge.pdf
Fortunato, DStevenson, RT (2013) Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 459477.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00623.x
Gamson, W (1961) A Theory of Coalition Formation. American Sociological Review 26(3), 373382.10.2307/2090664
Glasgow, G, Golder, MGolder, SN (2012) ‘New Empirical Strategies for the Study of Parliamentary Government Formation.’ Political Analysis 20(2), 248270.10.1093/pan/mpr058
Glasgow, GGolder, SN (2015) A New Approach to the Study of Parties Entering Government. British Journal of Political Science 45(4), 739754.10.1017/S0007123414000015
Grimmer, J (2013) Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139207782
Grynaviski, JD (2010) Partisan Bonds: Political Reputations and Legislative Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511676055
Harbridge, LMalhotra, N (2011) Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments. American Journal of Political Science 55(3), 494510.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00517.x
Hetherington, MJ (2001) Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization. American Political Science Review 95(3), 619631.10.1017/S0003055401003045
Indridason, IH (2011) Coalition Formation and Polarisation. European Journal of Political Research 50(5), 689718.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01990.x
Iversen, TSoskice, D (2006) Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalition: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 100(2), 165181.10.1017/S0003055406062083
Klingemann, H-D, Richard, IHBudge, I (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Lachat, R (2008) The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting. Electoral Studies 27(4), 687698.10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.002
Lederer, WKüchenhoff, H (2006) A Short Introduction to the SIMEX and MCSIMEX. The Newsletter of the R Project 6(4), 26.
Levendusky, M (2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001
Lupu, N (2014) Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. World Politics 66(4), 561602.10.1017/S0043887114000197
Martin, LWRandolph, TS (2001) Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 45(1), 3350.10.2307/2669358
Müller, WCStrøm, KM (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625695
Nannestad, PPaldam, M (2003) The Cost of Ruling. In Michael Taylor Hans (ed.), Economic Voting. Dorussen: Routledge.
Paldam, MSkott, P (1995) A Rational-Voter Explanation of the Cost of Ruling. Public Choice 83(1-2), 159172.10.1007/BF01047690
Poole, KTRosenthal, H (2007) Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Powell, GBWhitten, GD (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37(2), 391414.10.2307/2111378
Prior, M (2005) News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 49(3), 577592.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
Prior, M (2007) Post-broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139878425
Sagarzazu, IKlüver, H (2017) Coalition Governments and Party Competition: Political Communication Strategies of Coalition Parties. Political Science Research and Methods 5(2), 333349.10.1017/psrm.2015.56
Singh, SPThornton, JR (2016) Strange Bedfellows: Coalition Makeup and Perceptions of Democratic Performance among Electoral Winners. Electoral Studies 42, 114125.10.1016/j.electstud.2016.01.008
Soroka, SNWlezien, C (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0015
Spoon, J-JKlüver, H (2016) Does Anybody Notice? How Policy Positions of Coalition Parties Are Perceived by Voters. European Journal of Political Research 56(1), 115132.10.1111/1475-6765.12169
Stevenson, RT (2002) The Cost of Ruling, Cabinet Duration, and the “Median-Gap” Model. Public Choice 113(1-2), 157178.10.1023/A:1020351406757
Tavits, M (2007) Clarity of Responsibility and Corruption. American Journal of Political Science 51(1), 218229.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00246.x
Van der Eijk, C, Schmitt, HBinder, T (2005) Left-right Orientations and Party Choice. In Jacques Thomassen (ed), The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, 167–91. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199273219.003.0007
Wlezien, C (1995) The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science 39(4), 9811000.10.2307/2111666
Zaller, JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818691

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Falcó-Gimeno and Fernandez-Vazquez Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations

  • Albert Falcó-Gimeno (a1) and Pablo Fernandez-Vazquez (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.