Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Contested Ground: Disentangling Material and Symbolic Attachment to Disputed Territory

  • Devorah Manekin, Guy Grossman and Tamar Mitts
Abstract

Territorial disputes are prone to conflict because of the value of territory to publics, whether due to its strategic and material worth, or to its intangible, symbolic value. Yet despite the implications of the distinction for both theory and policy, empirically disentangling the material from the symbolic has posed formidable methodological challenges. We propose a set of tools for assessing the nature of individual territorial attachment, drawing on a series of survey experiments in Israel. Using these tools, we find that a substantial segment of the Jewish population is attached to the disputed West Bank territory for intangible reasons, consisting not only of far-right voters but also of voters of moderate-right and centrist parties. This distribution considerably narrows the bargaining space of leaders regardless of coalitional configurations. Our empirical analysis thus illustrates how the distribution of territorial preferences in the domestic population can have powerful implications for conflict and its resolution.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Devorah Manekin is an Assistant Professor at the Department of International Relations, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, 9190501 (dmanekin@mail.huji.ac.il). Guy Grossman is an Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania. 208 S. 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (ggros@sas.upenn.edu), and a member of the Evidence in Governance and Politics (EGAP) network. Tamar Mitts is an Assistant Professor at the School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University. 420 West 118th Street New York, NY 10027 (tm2630@columbia.edu). The authors thank Daniel Berliner, Alex Braithwaite, Allan Dafoe, Naoki Egami, James Fearon, Noam Gidron, Stacie Goddard, Shanker Satyanath, Jacob Shapiro, Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Jakana Thomas, and two anonynmous reviewers for valuable feedback on earlier drafts. Guy Grossman wishes to thank The Christopher H. Brown Center for International Politics at the University of Pennsylvania and the Israel Institute for their generous support of this study. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.22

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Braithwaite, Alex, and Lemke, Douglas. 2011. ‘Unpacking Escalation’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28(2):111123.
Carter, David. 2010. ‘The Strategy of Territorial Conflict’. American Journal of Political Science 54(4):969987.
Caselli, Francesco, Morelli, Massimo, and Rohner, Dominic. 2015. ‘The Geography of Interstate Resource Wars’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(1):267315.
Chong, Dennis, Citrin, Jack, and Conley, Patricia. 2001. ‘When Self-Interest Matters’. Political Psychology 22(3):541570.
Diehl, Paul. 1999. A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Fearon, James. 1995. ‘Rationalist Explanations for War’. International Organization 49(3):379414.
Fearon, James. 2004. ‘Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?’. Journal of Peace Research 41(3):275301.
Forsberg, Tuomas. 1996. ‘Explaining Territorial Disputes: From Power Politics to Normative Reasons’. Journal of Peace Research 33(4):433449.
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Tir, Jaroslav. 2009. ‘Territorial Dimensions of Enduring Internal Rivalries’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 26(4):307329.
Gent, Stephen, and Shannon, Megan. 2010. ‘The Effectiveness of International Arbitration and Adjudication: Getting Into a Bind’. The Journal of Politics 72(02):366380.
Gibler, Douglas M. 2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ginges, Jeremy, Scott, Atran, Medin, Douglas, and Shikaki, Khalil. 2007. ‘Sacred Bounds on Rational Resolution of Violent Political Conflict’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(18):73577360.
Goddard, Stacie. 2006. ‘Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy’. International Organization 60(1):3568.
Goemans, Hein, and Schultz, Kenneth. 2017. ‘The Politics of Territorial Claims: A Geospatial Approach Applied to Africa’. International Organization 71(1):3164.
Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul. 1992. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. London: Routledge.
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. ‘Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments’. Political Analysis 22(1):130.
Hartzell, Caroline, and Hoddie, Matthew. 2003. ‘Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-civil War Conflict Management’. American Journal of Political Science 47(2):318332.
Hassner, Ron. 2003. ‘To Halve and to Hold: Conflicts over Sacred Space and the Problem of Indivisibility’. Security Studies 12(4):133.
Hensel, Paul. 2012. ‘Territory: Geography, Contentious Issues, and World Politics’. In John A., Vasquez (eds), What Do We Know About War 2nd ed., 326. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hensel, Paul, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2005. ‘Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims’. GeoJournal 64(4):275285.
Huth, Paul. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kydd, Andrew. 2006. ‘When Can Mediators Build Trust?’. American Political Science Review 100(3):449462.
Lustick, Ian. 1993. Unsettled States Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Newman, David. 1999. ‘Real Spaces, Symbolic Spaces: Interrelated Notions of Territory in the Arab-Israeli Conflict’. In Paul F., Diehl (eds), A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict, 334. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Pedahzur, Ami. 2012. The Triumph of Israel’s Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press.
Powell, Robert. 2006. ‘War as a Commitment Problem’. International Organization 60(1):169203.
Rynhold, Jonathan, and Waxman, Dov. 2008. ‘Ideological Change and Israel’s Disengagement from Gaza’. Political Science Quarterly 123(1):1137.
Sears, David, and Funk, Carolyn. 1991. ‘The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24(1):191.
Senese, Paul. 2005. ‘Territory, Contiguity, and International Conflict: Assessing a New Joint Explanation’. American Journal of Political Science 49(4):769779.
Shelef, Nadav. 2016. ‘Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict’. International Organization 70(1):3363.
Tir, Jaroslav. 2010. ‘Territorial Diversion: Diversionary Theory of War and Territorial Conflict’. The Journal of Politics 72(2):413425.
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2014. ‘Territory and War’. Journal of Peace Research 51(2):185198.
Tomz, Michael, and Weeks, Jessica. 2013. ‘Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace’. American Political Science Review 107(4):849865.
Vasquez, John. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walter, Barbara. 1997. ‘The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement’. International organization 51(3):335364.
Zellman, Ariel. 2015. ‘Framing Consensus: Evaluating the Narrative Specificity of Territorial Indivisibility’. Journal of Peace Research 52(4):492507.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Manekin et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Manekin et al. supplementary material
Manekin et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (697 KB)
697 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 229 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th June 2018 - 17th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.