Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The Correlates of Media Freedom: An Introduction of the Global Media Freedom Dataset*

  • Jenifer Whitten-Woodring and Douglas A. Van Belle
Abstract

Media freedom has motivated substantial political activism, yet there are surprising gaps in the related academic literature, in part because of a lack of historic and consistent data. We introduce the newly expanded Global Media Freedom Dataset, which includes 196 countries from 1948 to 2012, and demonstrate how it can be used to test previous hypotheses and assumptions about the correlates of media freedom.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Jenifer Whitten-Woodring, Assistant Professor, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Political Science, Dugan Hall, 201 E, 883 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA 01854-3040 USA (jenifer_whittenwoodring@uml.edu). Douglas A. Van Belle, Senior Lecturer, Victoria University of Wellington, School of English, Film, Theatre and Media Studies, 83 Fairlie Terrace, Room 307, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand (douglas.vanbelle@vuw.ac.nz). The authors wish to thank the associates at University of Massachusetts Lowell Center for Women and Work for their thoughtful suggestions and the editors and two anonymous reviewers at Political Science Research and Methods for their helpful comments. Any mistakes are completely authors’ own. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.68

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bennett, W. Lance, Lawrence, Regina G., and Livingston, Steven. 2007. When the Press Fails. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
BP Statistical Review of World Energy. 2014. ‘BP Statistical Review of World Energy’. Available at http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf
Breunig, Christian. 1994. Kommunikationsfreiheiten: Ein Internationaler Vergleich. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and James, Patrick. 2006. ‘Media Openness, Democracy and Militarized Interstate Disputes: An Empirical Analysis’. British Journal of Political Science 37:2346.
Committee to Protect Journalists. 2011. ‘Attacks on the Press’. Committee to Protect Journalists 2010. Available at www.cpj.org/attacksonthepress/, accessed 1 April 2011.
Czepek, Andrea. 2009. ‘Pluralism and Participation as Desired Results of Press Freedom: Measuring Media Performance’. In Andrea Czepek, Melanie Hellwig and Eva Nowak (eds), Press Freedom and Pluralism in Europe: Concepts and Conditions, 3744. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Intellect Publishing and The Chicago University Press.
Egorov, Georgy, Guriev, Sergei M., and Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. ‘Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data’. American Political Science Review 103(4):645668.
Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P.. 2015. ‘The Next Generation of the Penn World Table’. American Economic Review (forthcoming).
Freedom House. 2014. ‘Freedom of the Press Survey’. Freedom House. Available at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2014.
International Telecommunications Union. 2015. Percentage of Individuals Using the Internet. Available at http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx.
IREX. 2015. Media Sustainability Index. Available at https://www.irex.org/projects/media-sustainability-index-msi
Marshall, Monty G. 2013. Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV) and Conflict Regions, 1946–2012. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at www.systemicpeace.org.
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith. 2014. Polity IV Project. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at www.systemicpeace.org
McQuail, Denis. 2000. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage.
Milton, John. 2010. ‘Areopagitica: A Speech for the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing to the Parliament of England 1644’. Available at www.dartmouth.edu/~milton/reading_room/areopagitica/index.shtml, accessed 14 January 2010.
Nixon, Raymond B. 1960. ‘Factors Related to Freedom in National Press Systems’. Journalism Quarterly 37(1):1328.
Nixon, Raymond B. 1965. ‘Freedom in the World’s Press: A Fresh Appraisal with New Data’. Journalism Quarterly 42(1):914.
Reporters Without Borders. 2015. ‘World Press Freedom Index 2014’. Available at https://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php
Schoonvelde, Martijn. 2014. ‘Media Freedom and the Institutional Underpinnings of Political Knowledge’. Political Science Research and Methods 2(2):163178.
Stein, Elizabeth, and Kellam, Marisa. 2014. ‘Programming Presidential Agendas: Partisan and Media Environments that Lead Presidents to Fight Crime and Corruption’. Political Communication 31:2552.
United Nations. 1948. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. Available at http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Van Belle, Douglas A. 1997. ‘Press Freedom and the Democratic Peace’. Journal of Peace Research 40:405414.
Van Belle, Douglas A. 2000. Press Freedom and Global Politics. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer. 2009. ‘Watchdog or Lapdog? Media Freedom, Regime Type and Government Respect for Human Rights’. International Studies Quarterly 53:595625.
Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer, and Van Belle, Douglas A.. 2014. Historical Guide to World Media Freedom: A Country-by-Country Analysis . Washington DC: CQ Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Whitten-Woodring and Van Belle supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (290 KB)
290 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed