Skip to main content

Crowded Space, Fertile Ground: Party Entry and the Effective Number of Parties*

  • Daniel M. Kselman, Eleanor Neff Powell and Joshua A. Tucker

This paper develops a novel argument as to the conditions under which new political parties will form in democratic states. Our approach hinges on the manner in which politicians evaluate the policy implications of new party entry alongside considerations of incumbency for its own sake. We demonstrate that if candidates care sufficiently about policy outcomes, then the likelihood of party entry should increase with the effective number of status quo parties in the party system. This relationship weakens, and eventually disappears, as politicians’ emphasis on “office-seeking” motivations increases relative to their interest in public policy. We test these predictions with both aggregate electoral data in contemporary Europe and a data set on legislative volatility in Turkey, uncovering support for the argument that party system fragmentation should positively affect the likelihood of entry when policy-seeking motivations are relevant, but not otherwise.

Hide All

Daniel M. Kselman, IE School of International Relations ( Eleanor Neff Powell, University of Wisconsin, Madison ( Joshua A. Tucker, New York University ( The authors thank Jon Eguia, Herbert Kitschelt, Alex Kuo, Kevin Morrison, and participants in the International Conference on Political Economy and Institutions (ECOPEAI), University of Virgo 2012, for valuable feedback on previous versions. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Hide All
Ahmad, Feroz. 1993. The Making of Modern Turkey. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. ‘Policy Competition, Spatial Distance and Electoral Instability’. West European Politics 13(4):116.
Besley, Timothy, and Coate, Stephen. 1997. ‘An Economic Model of Representative Democracy’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1):85114.
Birnir, Johanna K. 2006. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bischoff, Carina S. 2012. ‘Electorally Unstable by Supply or Demand?—An Examination of the Causes of Electoral Volatility in Advanced Industrial Democracies’. Public Choice 156(3–4):537561.
Bugajski, Janusz. 2002. Political Parties of Eastern Europe: A Guide to Politics in the Post-Communist Era. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Calvert, Randall L. 1985. ‘Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence’. American Journal of Political Science 29(1):6995.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Downs, William M. 2009. ‘The 2008 Parliamentary Election in Romania’. Electoral Studies 28:510513.
Duverger, Maurice. 1952. ‘Public Opinion and Political Parties in France’. The American Political Science Review 46(4):10691078.
Golosov, Grigorri V. 2010. ‘The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach’. Party Politics 16(2):171192.
Greenberg, Joseph, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1987. ‘The Effect of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with Entry’. The American Political Science Review 81(2):525538.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Harmel, Robert, and Robertson, John D.. 1985. ‘Formation and Success of New Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’. International Political Science Review 6(4):501523.
Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Pres.
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. ‘Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others’. The American Political Science Review 100(2):165181.
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. ‘Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation’. American Political Science Review 95(1):4569.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kselman, Daniel. 2013. ‘Economic Development, Democratic Experience, and Political Parties’ Linkage Strategies’. Textit Comparative Political Studies 46(11):14531484.
Kselman, Daniel. 2012. ‘Electoral Accountability in Modern Turkey: Cyclical Evolutions in Programmatic and Clientelistic Politics, 1950–2011’. In Herbert Kitschelt (ed.), Research and Dialogue on Programmatic Parties and Party Systems, 184212. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Kselman, Daniel, and Tucker, Joshua. 2011. ‘A Formal Model of Party Entry in Parliamentary Systems with Proportional Representation’. In Norman Schofield and Gonzalo Caballero (eds), Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy, and Voting, 373388. London: Springer Press.
Kumbaracibaşi, Arda C. 2009. Turkish Politics and the Rise of the AKP: Dilemmas of Institutionalization and Leadership Strategy. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Laakso, Marku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. ‘Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’. Comparative Political Studies 12:327.
Lee, Dan. 2007. ‘Anticipating Entry: Major Party Positioning and Third Party Threat’. Manuscript, Department of Political Science, Duke University.
Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Lowe, Will, Benoit, Kenneth, Mikhaylov, Slava, and Laver, Michael. 2011. ‘Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1):123155.
Madrid, Raúl. 2005. ‘Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America’. Comparative Politics 38(1):120.
Mainwaring, Scott, Gervasoni, Carlos, and España-Nájera, Annabella. 2010. ‘The Vote Share of New and Young Parties’. Kellogg Institute Working Paper Series WP 368.
Markowski, Radoslaw (ed.) 2002. System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze: dekada polskich doswiad-czen (Party System and Electoral Behavior: A Decade of Polish Experiences). Warszawa: Ebert Stiftung and ISP PAN Publishers.
Marsh, Christopher. 2002. Russia at the Polls: Voters, Elections, and Democratization. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Myerson, Roger B. 1993. ‘Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Corruption’. Games and Economic Behavior 5:118132.
Osborne, Martin J. 2000. ‘Entry-Deterring Policy Differentiation by Electoral Candidates’. Mathematical Social Sciences 40:4162.
Osborne, Martin J., and Slivinski, Al. 1996. ‘A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(1):6596.
Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984. ‘Spatial Equilibrium with Entry’. Review of Economic Studies 51:139156.
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2014. ‘Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches’. British Journal of Political Science 44(1):123147.
Roberts, Kenneth, and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. ‘Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations’. The American Political Science Review 93(3):575590.
Roemer, John. 2001. Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., Behr, Roy L., and Lazarus, Edward H.. 1996. Third Parties in America, 2nd ed., revised and expanded Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rydgren, Jens. 2004. ‘Explaining the Emergence of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties: The Case of Denmark’. West European Politics 27(3):474502.
Rydgren, Jens. 2005. ‘Is Extreme Right-Wing Populism Contagious? Explaining the Emergence of a New Party Family’. European Journal of Political Research 44:413437.
Sayarı, Sabri. 2000. ‘The Changing Party System’. In Yılmaz Esmer and Sabri Sayarı (eds), Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey, 932. Boulder, CO: Lynn Reiner.
Senyuva, Ozeghan. 2010. ‘Parliamentary Elections in Moldova, April and July 2009’. Electoral Studies 29:171195.
Strom, Kaare. 1990. ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’. American Journal of Political Science 34(2):565598.
Taagepera, Rein. 1997. ‘Effective Number of Parties for Incomplete Data’. Electoral Studies 16(2):145151.
Tavits, Margit. 2005. ‘The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe’. American Journal of Political Science 49(2):283298.
Tavits, Margit. 2006. ‘Party System Change: Testing a Model of New Party Entry’. Party Politics 12(1):99119.
Tavits, Margit. 2008. ‘Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies’. British Journal of Political Science 38:113133.
Tucker, Joshua A. 2002. ‘The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?’. Annual Review of Political Science 5:271304.
Tucker, Joshua A. 2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–99. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wittenberg, Jason. 2006. Crucibles of Political Loyalty: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in Hungary. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wittman, Donald. 1977. ‘Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model’. Journal of Economic Theory 14(1):180189.
Wittman, Donald. 1983. ‘Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories’. American Political Science Review 77(1):142157.
Zielinski, Jakub, Slomczynski, Kazimierz, and Shabad, Goldie. 2005. ‘Electoral Control in New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems’. World Politics 57(3):365395 (no longer cited).
Zürcher, Erik J. 2000. Turkey: A Modern History. London and New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Kselman supplementary material

 PDF (122 KB)
122 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 77 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 453 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.