Skip to main content Accessibility help

Descriptive representation and public support for Supreme Court nominees

  • Jaclyn Kaslovsky (a1), Jon C. Rogowski (a1) and Andrew R. Stone (a1)


Though the demographic characteristics of judicial nominees in the United States have gained increased political attention in recent years, relatively little is known about how they affect public opinion toward judicial nominees and courts. We evaluate these relationships in the context of race and gender using a conjoint experiment conducted during a recent vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court. We find consistent evidence that Americans are more supportive of coracial nominees, particularly among white Republicans and Black Democrats, but no evidence of a similar effect on the basis of gender. Our results have important implications for theories of descriptive representation and suggest limits to its use as a means for generating political support for judicial nominees.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Atkeson, LR and Carrillo, N (2007) More is better: the influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Politics & Gender 3, 79101.
Badas, A and Stauffer, KE (2018) Someone like me: descriptive representation and support for supreme court nominees. Political Research Quarterly 71, 127142.
Bartels, BL and Johnston, CD (2012) Political justice?: perceptions of politicization and public preferences toward the supreme court appointment process. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 105116.
Berinsky, AJ, Huber, GA and Lenz, GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research:'s mechanical turk. Political Analysis 20, 351368.
Beth, RS and Palmer, B (2011) Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789–2011. Technical Report, Congressional Research Service; available at
Boyd, CL, Epstein, L and Martin, AD (2010) Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science 54, 389411.
Broockman, DE (2014) Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies 34, 190204.
Dawson, MC (1994) Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Epstein, L, Lindstädt, R, Segal, JA and Westerland, C (2006) The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees. Journal of Politics 68, 296307.
Evans, D, Franco, A, Polinard, JL, Wenzel, JP and Wrinkle, RD (2017) Who's on the bench? The impact of latino descriptive representation on U.S. supreme court approval among latinos and anglos. Social Science Quarterly 98, 12331249.
Fairdosi, AS and Rogowski, JC (2015) Candidate race, partisanship, and political participation: when do black candidates increase black turnout? Political Research Quarterly 68, 337349.
Fraga, BL (2016a) Candidates or districts? Reevaluating the role of race in voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science 60, 97122.
Fraga, BL (2016b) Redistricting and the causal impact of race on voter turnout. The Journal of Politics 78, 1934.
Gay, C (2002) Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and their government. American Journal of Political Science 46, 717732.
Gibson, JL and Caldeira, GA (2009) Knowing the supreme court? A reconsideration of public ignorance of the high court. Journal of Politics 71, 429441.
Glynn, AN and Sen, M (2015) Identifying judicial empathy: does having daughters cause judges to rule for women's issues? American Journal of Political Science 59, 3754.
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, DJ and Yamamoto, T (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22, 130.
Henderson, JA, Sekhon, JS and Titiunik, R (2016) Cause or effect? turnout in hispanic majority-minority districts. Political Analysis 24, 404412.
Huddy, L and Terkildsen, N (1993) Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37, 119147.
Ifill, SA (1998) Judging the judges: racial diversity, impartiality and representation on state trial courts. Boston College Law Review 39, 95149.
Kastellec, J, Lax, J and Phillips, J (2010) Public opinion and senate confirmation of supreme court nominees. Journal of Politics 72, 767782.
Keith, BE, Magleby, DB, Nelson, CJ, Orr, E, Westlye, MC and Wolfinger, RE (1992) The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lerman, AE and Sadin, ML (2016) Stereotyping or projection? How white and black voters estimate black candidates' ideology. Political Psychology 37, 147163.
Lublin, D (1997) The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McDermott, ML (1998) Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51, 895918.
Merolla, JL, Sellers, AH and Fowler, DJ (2013) Descriptive representation, political efficacy, and African Americans in the 2008 presidential election. Political Psychology 34, 863875.
Overby, LM, Henschen, BM, Strauss, J and Walsh, MH (1994) African-American constituents and supreme court nominees: an examination of the senate confirmation of Thurgood Marshall. Political Research Quarterly 47, 839855.
Preuhs, RR (2006) The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: black legislators and policy influence in the American states. Journal of Politics 68, 585599.
Redman, SM (2017) Descriptive gender representation and legitimacy in U.S. trial courts. Justice System Journal 38, 311331.
Rogowski, JC and Stone, AR (Forthcoming) How political contestation over judicial nominations polarizes Americans' attitudes toward the supreme court. British Journal of Political Science.
Sanbonmatsu, K (2002) Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science 46, 2034.
Scherer, N (2004) Blacks on the bench. Political Science Quarterly 119, 655675.
Scherer, N and Curry, B (2010) Does descriptive race representation enhance institutional legitimacy? The case of the U.S. courts. Journal of Politics 72, 90104.
Schwindt-Bayer, LA and Mishler, W (2005) An integrated model of women's representation. Journal of Politics 67, 407428.
Sen, M (2017) How political signals affect public support for judicial nominations: evidence from a conjoint experiment. Political Research Quarterly 70, 374393.
West, EA (2017) Descriptive representation and political efficacy: evidence from Obama and Clinton. Journal of Politics 79, 351355.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Kaslovsky et al. Dataset

Supplementary materials

Kaslovsky et al. supplementary material
Appendices A-C

 PDF (448 KB)
448 KB

Descriptive representation and public support for Supreme Court nominees

  • Jaclyn Kaslovsky (a1), Jon C. Rogowski (a1) and Andrew R. Stone (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed