Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?

  • Gregory J. Martin (a1) and Steven W. Webster (a2)
Abstract

Political preferences in the United States are highly correlated with population density, at national, state, and metropolitan-area scales. Using new data from voter registration records, we assess the extent to which this pattern can be explained by geographic mobility. We find that the revealed preferences of voters who move from one residence to another correlate with partisan affiliation, though voters appear to be sorting on non-political neighborhood attributes that covary with partisan preferences rather than explicitly seeking politically congruent neighbors. But, critically, we demonstrate through a simulation study that the estimated partisan bias in moving choices is on the order of five times too small to sustain the current geographic polarization of preferences. We conclude that location must have some influence on political preference, rather than the other way around, and provide evidence in support of this theory.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: gjmartin@stanford.edu
References
Hide All
Ansolabehere, S, Palmer, M Lee, A (2014) Precinct-Level Election Data. Harvard Dataverse: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21919
Ansolabehere, S Rodden, J (2011) Florida Data Files. Harvard Dataverse: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/16797.
Bishop, B (2008) The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Brown, TA (1988) Migration and Politics: The Impact of Population Mobility on American Voting Behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Chen, J Rodden, J (2013) Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8(3), 239269.
Ferejohn, J (1986) Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50, 525.
Gimpel, JG Hui, IS (2015) Seeking Politically Compatible Neighbors? The Role of Neighborhood Partisan Composition in Residential Sorting. Political Geography 48, 130142.
Gimpel, JG Hui, I (2017) Inadvertent and Intentional Partisan Residential Sorting. The Annals of Regional Science 58(3), 441468.
Gordon, SC, Huber, GA Landa, D (2007) Challenger Entry and Voter Learning. American Political Science Review 101(2), 303320.
Hitsch, GJ, Hortacsu, A Ariely, D (2010) Matching and Sorting in Online Dating. American Economic Review 34, 130163.
Huber, GA Malhotra, N (2017) Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior. The Journal of Politics 79(1), 269283.
Lang, C Pearson-Merkowitz, S (2014) Partisan Sorting in the United States, 1972-2012: New Evidence from a Dynamic Analysis. Political Geography 48, 119129.
Levendusky, M (2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lipset, SM Rokkan, S (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Minnesota Population Center (2011) National Historical Geographic Information System. Technical Report Version 2.0. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Mummolo, J Nall, C (2017) Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation. The Journal of Politics 79(1), 4559.
Nall, C (2015) The Political Consequences of Spatial Policies: How Interstate Highways Facilitated Geographic Polarization. Journal of Politics 77(2), 394406.
Obama, B (2004) Transcript: Illinois Senate Candidate Barack Obama. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19751-2004Jul27.html, accessed 21 January 2016.
Prior, M (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rodden, J (2010) The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science 13, 321–340.
Tam Cho, WK, Gimpel, JG Hui, IS (2013) Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(4), 856870.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Martin and Webster supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (407 KB)
407 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed