Skip to main content

Geography, Uncertainty, and Polarization

  • Nolan McCarty, Jonathan Rodden, Boris Shor, Chris Tausanovitch and Christopher Warshaw...

Using new data on roll-call voting of US state legislators and public opinion in their districts, we explain how ideological polarization of voters within districts can lead to legislative polarization. In so-called “moderate” districts that switch hands between parties, legislative behavior is shaped by the fact that voters are often quite heterogeneous: the ideological distance between Democrats and Republicans within these districts is often greater than the distance between liberal cities and conservative rural areas. We root this intuition in a formal model that associates intradistrict ideological heterogeneity with uncertainty about the ideological location of the median voter. We then demonstrate that among districts with similar median voter ideologies, the difference in legislative behavior between Democratic and Republican state legislators is greater in more ideologically heterogeneous districts. Our findings suggest that accounting for the subtleties of political geography can help explain the coexistence of polarized legislators and a mass public that appears to contain many moderates.

Hide All

Nolan McCarty is the Professor in the Department of Politics, the Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 212 Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 ( Jonathan Rodden is the Professor in the Department of Political Science and Senior Fellow in the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Encina Hall Central, Room 444, Stanford, CA 94305 ( Boris Shor is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of Houston, 389 Phillip Guthrie Hoffman Hall, Houston, TX 77004 ( Chris Tausanovitch is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, 3383 Bunche Hall, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095 ( Christopher Warshaw is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, George Washington University, 422 Monroe Hall, 2115 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052 ( Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2013 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, the 2014 Conference on the Causes and Consequences of Policy Uncertainty at Princeton University, the 2014 European Political Science Association, and the Princeton Geneva Conference on Political Representation. The authors thank seminar participants at the Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard, Northwestern, and the DC area political science group. The authors thank Project Votesmart for access to NPAT survey data. The roll-call data collection has been supported financially by the John and Laura Arnold Foundation, Russell Sage Foundation, the Princeton University Woodrow Wilson School, the Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy program, and NSF Grants SES-1059716 and SES-1060092. Special thanks are due to Michelle Anderson and Peter Koppstein for running the roll-call data collection effort. The authors also thank the following for exemplary research assistance: Steve Rogers, Michael Barber, and Chad Levinson. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Hide All
Abadie, Alberto, and Imbens, Guido W.. 2006. ‘Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects’. Econometrica 74(1):235267.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. ‘Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections’. American Journal of Political Science 45(1):136159.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Ban, Pamela, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2017. ‘Harvard Election Data Archive’. Available at, accessed 25 August 2011.
Bafumi, Joseph, and Herron, Michael C.. 2010. ‘Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and their Members in Congress’. American Political Science Review 104(3):519542.
Bailey, Michael, and Brady, David W. 1998. ‘Heterogeneity and Representation: The Senate and Free Trade’. American Journal of Political Science 42(2):524544.
Barber, Michael J., and McCarty, Nolan. 2013. ‘Causes and Consequences of Polarization’. In Jane Mansbridge and Cathie Jo Martin (eds), Negotiating Agreement in Politics, 1953. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Bishin, Benjamin G., Dow, Jay K., and Adams, James. 2006. ‘Does Democracy “Suffer” from Diversity? Issue Representation and Diversity in Senate Elections’. Public Choice 129(1–2):201215.
Calvert, Randall L. 1985. ‘Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence’. American Journal of Political Science 29(1):6995.
Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. ‘Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House’. Journal of Politics 68(2):397409.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ensley, Michael J. 2012. ‘Incumbent Positioning, Ideological Heterogeneity and Mobilization in US House Elections’. Public Choice 151(1–2):4361.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. ‘Political Polarization in the American Public’. Annual Review of Political Science 11:563588.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel A.. 2010. ‘Where’s the polarization?’ In Richard G. Niemi, Herbert F. Weisberg and David C. Kimball (eds), Controversies in Voting Behavior, 309–318. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Lewis, Jeffrey B.. 2004. ‘Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation’. Journal of Political Economy 112(6):13641383.
Harden, Jeffrey J., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2012. ‘Balancing Constituency Representation and Party Responsiveness in the US Senate: The Conditioning Effect of State Ideological Heterogeneity’. Public Choice 150(1–2):137154.
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. ‘Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference’. Political Analysis 15(3):199236.
Jacobson, Gary. 2004. ‘Explaining the Ideological Polarization of the Congressional Parties since the 1970s’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, 15 April. Available at, accessed 1 February 2014.
Jones, David R. 2003. ‘Position Taking and Position Avoidance in the US Senate’. Journal of Politics 65(3):851863.
Kirkland, Justin H. 2014. ‘Ideological Heterogeneity and Legislative Polarization in the United States’. Political Research Quarterly 67(3):533546.
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. ‘How Should we Estimate Public Opinion in the States?’. American Journal of Political Science 53(1):107121.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew S., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2010. ‘Measuring Aggregate-Level Ideological Heterogeneity’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35(2):259282.
Manson, Steven, Schroeder, Jonathan, Van Riper, David, and Ruggles, Steven. 2017. ‘PUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 12.0 [Database]’. Available at, accessed 18 December 2014.
Masket, Seth E., Winburn, Jonathan, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2012. ‘The Gerrymanderers are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won’t Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It’. PS: Political Science & Politics 45(1):3943.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. ‘Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?’. American Journal of Political Science 53(3):666680.
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’. American Political Science Review 57(1):4556.
Orfield, Myron, and Luce, Thomas. 2013. ‘America’s Racially Diverse Suburbs: Opportunities and Challenges’. Housing Policy Debate, 23(2):395430.
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2004. ‘Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls’. Political Analysis 12:375385.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rodden, Jonathan. 2015. ‘Geography and Gridlock in the United States’. In Nathaniel Persily (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America, 104120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2011. ‘Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching package for R’. Journal of Statistical Software 42(7):152.
Shor, Boris. 2014. ‘Congruence, Responsiveness, and Representation in American State Legislatures’. Paper presented at 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 30 July. Available at, accessed 1 November 2014.
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. ‘The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures’. American Political Science Review 105(3):530551.
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas. 2012. ‘Spatial Diversity’. Harvard Law Review 125(1):19032010.
Tausanovitch, Chris, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2013. ‘Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities’. Journal of Politics 75(2):330342.
Warshaw, Christopher, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. ‘How Should we Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?’. Journal of Politics 74(1):203219.
Wittman, Donald. 1983. ‘Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories’. The American Political Science Review 77(1):142157.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

McCarty et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (977 KB)
977 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 803 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st March 2018 - 22nd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.