Skip to main content

Information credibility and responses to corruption: a replication and extension in Argentina

  • Matthew S. Winters (a1) and Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro (a2)

Existing research shows that survey respondents are sensitive to the source of information about political corruption and respond more strongly to information from more credible sources. This behavior occurs more frequently among the politically sophisticated. In a nation-wide survey in Argentina, we successfully replicate results originally found in a study in Brazil. In addition, we examine whether citizens process information about corruption differently depending on their partisan identities. At odds with our initial expectations, we find that copartisans, opposition partisans, and other/non-partisans distinguish between information sources in very similar ways. These results suggest that even though partisanship affects baseline assessments of political candidates, citizens of all types are sensitive to the credibility of information they receive about political corruption.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Alt, JE, Lassen, DDMarshall, J (2016) Credible Sources and Sophisticated Voters: When Does New Information Induce Economic Voting. Journal of Politics 78(2), 327342.
Anderson, CJTverdova, YV (2003) Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47(1), 91109.
Anduiza, E, Gallego, AMuñoz, J (2014) Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption. Comparative Political Studies 46(12), 16641692.
Bersch, K, Praça, STaylor, MM (2017) State Capacity, Bureaucratic Politicization, and Corruption in the Brazilian State. Governance 30(1), 105124.
Besley, TBurgess, R (2002) The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4), 14151451.
Botero, S et al. (2015) Says Who? An Experiment on Allegations of Corruption and Credibility of Sources. Political Research Quarterly 68(3), 493504.
Campbell, A, Converse, P, Miller, WStokes, D (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Chang, ECCKerr, NN (2017) An Insider-Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians. Governance 30(1), 6784.
Chong, A, Dean Karlan, Ana De la OWantchekon, L (2015) Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice and Party Identification. Journal of Politics 77(1), 5571.
Edelman Insights (2015) Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Results.” Scribd. Available at, accessed 27 March 2018.
Eggers, A (2014) Partisanship and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from the UK Expenses Scandal. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9(4), 441472.
Fernández-Vázquez, P, Barberá, PRivero, G (2016) Rooting Out Corruption or Rooting for Corruption? The Heterogeneous Electoral Consequences of Scandals. Political Science Research and Methods 4(2), 379397.
Ferraz, CFinan, F (2008) Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2), 703745.
Ferraz, CFinan, F (2011) Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments. American Economic Review 101(4), 12741311.
Gerber, ASGreen, DP (2012) Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Klašnja, M (2017) Uninformed Voters and Corrupt Politicians. American Politics Research 45(2), 256279.
Lupu, N (2015) Partisanship in Latin America. In Carlin RE, Singer MM and Zechmeister E (eds), The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, 226245. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lupu, N, Oliveros, VSchiumerini, L (2019) Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Manin, B, Przeworski, AStokes, SC (1999) Elections and Representation. In Przeworski A, Stokes SC and Manin B (eds), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pande, R (2011) Can Informed Voters Enforce Better Governance? Experiments in Low Income Democracies. Annual Review of Economics 3, 215237.
Taber, CSLodge, M (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50(3), 755769.
Weitz-Shapiro, RWinters, MS (2017) Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil. Journal of Politics 79(1), 6074.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Winters and Weitz-Shapiro Dataset

Supplementary materials

Winters and Weitz-Shapiro supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (615 KB)
615 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed