Skip to main content Accessibility help

Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context

  • Cara Wong (a1), Jake Bowers (a1), Daniel Rubenson (a2), Mark Fredrickson (a3) and Ashlea Rundlett (a4)...


To understand the relationship between place and politics, we must measure both political attitudes and the ways in which place is represented in the minds of individuals. In this paper, we assess a new measure of mental representation of geography, in which survey respondents draw their own local communities on maps and describe them. We use a panel study in Canada to present evidence that these maps are both valid and reliable measures of a personally relevant geographic area, laying the measurement groundwork for the growing number of studies using this technology. We hope to set efforts to measure “place” for the study of context and politics on firmer footing. Our validity assessments show that individuals are thinking about people and places with which they have regular contact when asked to draw their communities. Our reliability assessments show that people can draw more or less the same map twice, even when the exercise is repeated months later. Finally, we provide evidence that the concept of community is a tangible consideration in the minds of ordinary citizens and is not simply a normative aspiration or motivation.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Agnew, J (2011) Space and Place. Handbook of Geographical Knowledge 2011, 316331.
Campbell, DT Fiske, DW (1959) Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56(2), 81.
Furnham, A Boo, HC (2011) A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics 40(1), 3542.
Groves, RM (2011) Three Eras of Survey Research. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1), 861871.
Hillery, GA (1955) Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement. Rural Sociology 20(2), 111123.
Keller, S (2003) Community: Pursuing the Dream, Living the Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lippmann, W (1991) Public Opinion. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
Schwarz, N (1995) What Respondents Learn from Questionnaires: The Survey Interview and the Logic of Conversation. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 63, 153168.
Schwarz, N Sudman, S, eds. (1992) Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Tourangeau, R Rasinski, KA (1988) Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 299.
Wilson, TD et al. (1996) A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125(4), 387.
Wong, C (2010) Boundaries of Obligationin American Politics:Geographic, National, and Racial Communities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, C et al. (2012) “Bringing the Person Back in: Boundaries, Perceptions, and the Measurement of Racial Context”. Journal of Politics 74(4), 11531170.
Zaller, J Feldman, S (1992) A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36, 579616.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Wong et al. Dataset


Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context

  • Cara Wong (a1), Jake Bowers (a1), Daniel Rubenson (a2), Mark Fredrickson (a3) and Ashlea Rundlett (a4)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.