Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors*

  • Nathan P. Kalmoe
Abstract

How do personality traits condition the effects of campaign messages meant to mobilize voters? With two nationally representative US survey experiments, I show that common aggressive metaphors mobilize or demobilize voters depending on their traits. Aggressive metaphors increase the mobilizing impact of motivations to participate among aggressive individuals but decrease that impact among low-aggression people. For example, the language mobilizes strong partisans with aggressive personalities but demobilizes strong partisans low in aggression. This heterogeneity showcases the nuanced power of metaphors in campaigns, reaffirms the importance of personality in political behavior, and reveals the hidden role of aggression in non-violent political behavior for the first time. In practice, the net effects of aggressive metaphors can be positive, negative, or null depending on average traits in an audience.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Nathan Kalmoe is an Assistant Professor of Political Communication at Louisiana State University, Journalism Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (nkalmoe@lsu.edu). This project was supported by the Gerald R. Ford Fellowship and the Marsh Research Fellowship at the University of Michigan. Data for Study 2 were collected by Time-Sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, NSF Grant 0818839, Jeremy Freese and Penny Visser, Principal Investigators. The author thanks Don Kinder, Ted Brader, Nancy Burns, Nick Valentino, Brad Bushman, Jenna Bednar, Cindy Kam, Charles Doriean, Josh Gubler, anonymous reviewers, and the participants of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Politics and Policy at the University of Michigan for their comments and suggestions. An earlier version of this work was presented at the 2011 APSA Annual Meeting. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.36

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher, and Blais, Andre. 2010. ‘Intention to Vote, Reported Vote, and Validated Vote’. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper, Washington, D.C.
Anderson, Craig A., and Bushman, Brad J.. 2002. ‘Human Aggression’. Annual Review of Psychology 53:2751.
Anderson, Craig A., and Ford, Catherine M.. 1986. ‘Affect of the game player: Short-term effects of highly and mildly aggressive video games’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12:390402.
Anderson, Craig A., Carnagey, Nicholas L., and Eubanks, Janie. 2003. ‘Exposure to Aggressive Media: The Effects of Songs With Aggressive Lyrics on Aggressive Thoughts and Feelings’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:960971.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative. New York, NY: Free Press.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bettencourt, B. Ann, and Miller, Norman. 1996. ‘Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis’. Psychological Bulletin 119:422447.
Bougher, Lori D. 2012. ‘The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition’. Political Psychology 33:145163.
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brader, Ted, and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2007. ‘Identities, Interests, and Emotions: Symbolic versus Material Wellsprings of Fear, Anger, and Enthusiasm’. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler and Michael MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect: The Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, 180201. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2006. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis’. Political Analysis 14:6382.
Bryant, Fred B., and Smith, Bruce D.. 2001. ‘Refining the Architecture of Aggression: A Measurement odel for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire’. Journal of Research in Personality 35:138167.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay L., and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bushman, Brad J. 1995. ‘Moderating Role of Trait Aggressiveness in the Effects of Aggressive Media on Aggression’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:950960.
Bushman, Brad J. 1996. ‘Individual Differences in the Extent and Development of Aggressive Cognitive-Associative Networks’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:811819.
Bushman, Brad J. 1998. ‘Priming Effects of Media Violence on the Accessibility of Aggressive Constructs in Memory’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24:537545.
Bushman, Brad J., and Wells, Gary L.. 1998. ‘Trait aggression and hockey penalties: Predicting hot tempers on the ice’. Journal of Applied Psychology 83:969974.
Buss, Arnold H., and Perry, Mark. 1992. ‘The Aggression Questionnaire’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:452459.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cappella, Joseph N., and Jamieson, Kathleen H.. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Caprara, G. V., Renzi, P., Alcini, P., D’Imperio, G., and Travaglia, G.. 1983. ‘Instigation to aggress and escalation of aggression examined from a personological perspective: The role of irritability and of emotional susceptibility’. Aggressive Behavior 9:345351.
Chang, Linchiat, and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2009. ‘National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality’. Public Opinion Quarterly 73:641678.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. ‘Framing Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science 10:103126.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2010. ‘Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects Over Time’. American Political Science Review 104:663680.
Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G., and Silver, Glenn E.. 1990. ‘Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items’. Political Behavior 12(3):289314.
Felsten, Gary, and Hill, Virgil. 1999. ‘Aggression Questionnaire hostility scale predicts anger in response to mistreatment’. Behavior Research and Therapy 37:8797.
Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Ken. 1999. ‘Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads’. American Journal of Political Science 43:11891208.
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2008. ‘Social Pressure & Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment’. American Political Science Review 102:3348.
Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. ‘How Large and Long-Lasting are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment’. American Political Science Review 105(1):135150.
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Greg A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Panagopoulos, C.. 2013. ‘Big Five Personality Traits and Responses to Persuasive Appeals: Results from Voter Turnout Experiments’. Political Behavior 35:687728.
Harris, Julie A. 1997. ‘A Further Evaluation of the Aggression Questionnaire: Issues of Validity and Reliability’. Behavioral Research and Therapy 35:10471053.
Hartman, Todd K. 2012. ‘Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality’. Political Communication 29:278298.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2005. ‘Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000’. Journal of Politics 66:5068.
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, and Cassese, Erin. 2007. ‘On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger’. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler and M. MacKuen (eds), The Affect Effect, p. 202230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Joel T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1981. ‘The Effect of Metaphor on Political Attitudes’. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2:305316.
Kalmoe, Nathan P. 2014. ‘Fueling the Fire: Aggressive Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence’. Political Communication 31(4):545563.
Kalmoe, Nathan P. 2015. ‘Trait Aggression in Two Representative U.S. Surveys: Testing the Generalizability of College Samples’. Aggressive Behavior 41(2):171188.
Kalmoe, Nathan P., Gubler, Joshua R., and Wood, David A.. 2017 ‘Toward Conflict or Compromise? How Violent Metaphors Polarize Partisan Issue Attitudes’. Political Communication. Online First View.
Kam, Cindy D., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. ‘Risk Orientations and Policy Frames’. Journal of Politics 72:381396.
Kinder, Donald R. 2007. ‘Curmudgeonly Advice’. Journal of Communication 57:155162.
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2011. ‘When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout’. American Journal of Political Science 55:796812.
Landau, Mark J., Meier, Brian P., and Keefer, Lucas A.. 2010. ‘A metaphor-enriched social cognition’. Psychological Bulletin 136:10451067.
Lau, Richard R., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2005. ‘Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies’. Political Psychology 26:77114.
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. ‘The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment’. American Political Science Review 93:851875.
Lavine, Howard, Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 2000. ‘On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing’. Political Psychology 21:81106.
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marshall, Margaret A., and Brown, Jonathon D.. 2006. ‘Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the Traits as Situational Sensitivities (TASS) model’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:11001113.
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2000. ‘News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source’. American Journal of Political Science 44(2):301315.
Miller, Joanne M., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2016. ‘It’s Not All About Resources: Explaining (or Not) the Instability of Individual-Level Political Participation Over Time’. American Politics Research 44:943981.
Moise-Titus, Jessica M. 1999. The role of negative emotions in the media violence-aggression relation. Dissertation.
Mondak, Jeffery J., Hibbing, Matthew V., Canache, Damarys, Seligson, Mitchell A., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2010. ‘Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior’. American Political Science Review 104:85110.
Mutz, Diana, and Reeves, Byron. 2005. ‘The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust’. American Political Science Review 99(1):115.
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance’. American Political Science Review 91:567583.
Niemi, Richard G., Craig, Stephen C., and Mattei, Franco. 1991. ‘Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study’. American Political Science Review 85:14071413.
Ottati, Victor, Rhoads, Susan, and Graesser, Arthur C.. 1999. ‘The Effect of Metaphor in Processing Style in a Persuasion Task: A Motivational Resonance Model’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:688697.
Pitney, John J. 2000. The Art of Political Warfare. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Rosenstone, Stephen J., and Hansen, John M.. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. Hindsale, IL: Wadsworth Publishing.
Schlesinger, Mark, and Lau, Richard R.. 2000. ‘The Meaning and Measure of Policy Metaphors’. American Political Science Review 94:611626.
Sharpe, J. P., and Desai, S.. 2001. ‘The revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression’. Personality and Individual Differences 31:505518.
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tremblay, Paul F., and Ewart, Laura A.. 2005. ‘The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relation to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies’. Personality and Individual Differences 38:337346.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Beckmann, Matthew N., and Burr, Thomas A.. 2001. ‘A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government’. Political Communication 18:347367.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 2011. ‘Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation’. Journal of Politics 73:156170.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinschenk, Aaron C., and Panagopoulos, Costas. 2014. ‘Personality, Negativity, and Political Participation’. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 2:164182.
Wilson, Edward O. 2004. On Human Nature, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winter, David G. 1987. ‘Leader Appeal, Leader Performance, and the Motive Profiles of Leaders and Followers: A Study of American Presidents and Elections’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:196202.
Zaller, John 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Kalmoe supplementary material
Kalmoe supplementary material 2

 PDF (352 KB)
352 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Kalmoe supplementary material
Kalmoe supplementary material 1

 Word (47 KB)
47 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Kalmoe Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 828 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th October 2017 - 22nd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.