Skip to main content Accessibility help

Partisan Disagreements Arising from Rationalization of Common Information*

  • Benjamin E. Lauderdale


Why do opposing partisans sometimes disagree about the facts and processes that are relevant to understanding political issues? One explanation is that citizens may have a psychological tendency toward adopting beliefs about the political world that rationalize their partisan preferences. Previous quantitative evidence for rationalization playing a role in explaining partisan factual disagreement has come from cross-sectional covariation and from correction experiments. In this paper, I argue that these rationalizations can occur as side effects when citizens change their attitudes in response to partisan cues and substantively relevant facts about a political issue. Following this logic, I motivate and report the results of a survey experiment that provides US Republicans and Democrats with information that they will be inclined to rationalize in different ways, because they have different beliefs about which political actors they should agree with. The results are a novel experimental demonstration that partisan disagreements about the political world can arise from rationalization.



Hide All

Benjamin E. Lauderdale, Associate Professor, Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE ( In addition to the editors and reviewers of this journal, the author thanks Chris Achen, Larry Bartels, John Bullock, Nick Carnes, Andy Eggers, Sarah Goff, Tali Mendelberg, Markus Prior, Marco Steenbergen and many others for comments on this paper and the various working papers from which it derived. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit



Hide All
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. ‘Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions’. Political Behavior 24(2):117150.
Bartels, Larry M. 2007. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bullock, John G. 2011. ‘Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate’. American Political Science Review 105:496515.
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan S., Hill, Seth, and Huber, Gregory A.. 2013. ‘Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs About Politics’. Working Paper No. 19080, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
Cohen, Geoffrey. 2003. ‘Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5):808822.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Pickup, Mark. 2010. ‘Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle’. Journal of Politics 72(4):12361251.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. ‘Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq’. Journal of Politics 69(4):957974.
Gilens, Martin. 2001. ‘Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences’. American Political Science Review 95(2):379396.
Hamilton, Lawrence C. 2010. ‘Education, Politics, and Opinions About Climate Change Evidence for Interactions Effects’. Climatic Change 104(2):231242.
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Wiley.
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2012. ‘Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment’. Journal of Politics 74:672684.
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. ‘Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences’. Political Behavior 27(2):163182.
Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. ‘Americans’ Perceptions of Presidential Candidates: A Test of the Projection Hypothesis’. Journal of Social Issues 46(2):159182.
Krosnick, Jon A. 2002. ‘The Challenges of Political Psychology: Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Attitude Perception’. In James H. Kuklinski (ed.), Thinking About Political Psychology, 115152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, Schwider, David, and Rich, Robert F.. 2000. ‘Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship’. Journal of Politics 62(3):790816.
Kull, Steven, Ramsey, Clay, and Lewis, Evan. 2003. ‘Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War’. Political Science Quarterly 118(4):569598.
Kunda, Ziva. 1987. ‘Motivated Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Causal Theories’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(4):636647.
Lauderdale, Benjamin E. 2010. ‘Political Inference When Information is Scarce’. PhD Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mutz, Diana C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nicholson, Stephan P. 2012. ‘Polarizing Cues’. American Journal of Political Science 56(1):5266.
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. ‘When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions’. Political Behavior 32(2):303330.
Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason, and Ubel, Peter A.. 2013. ‘The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform’. Medical Care 51(2):127132.
Osgood, Charles H., and Tannenbaum, Percy H.. 1955. ‘The Principle of Congruity in Prediction of Attitude Change’. Psychological Review 62:4255.
Prasad, Monica, Perrin, Andrew J., Bezila, Kieran, Hoffman, Steve G., Kindleberger, Kate, Manturuk, Kim, and Powers, Ashleigh Smith. 2009. ‘“There Must be a Reason”: Osama, Saddam, and Inferred Justification’. Sociological Inquiry 79(2):142162.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taber, Charles, and Lodge, Milton. 2006. ‘Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs’. American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755769.
Tourangeau, Roger, Rips, Lance J., and Rasinski, Kenneth. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, J. Matthew, and Gronke, Paul. 2000. ‘Concordance and Projection in Citizen Perceptions of Congressional Roll-Call Voting’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(3):445467.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Lauderdale supplementary material

 PDF (362 KB)
362 KB
Supplementary materials

Lauderdale Dataset


Partisan Disagreements Arising from Rationalization of Common Information*

  • Benjamin E. Lauderdale


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.