Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Patterns of disagreement in indicators of state repression

  • Kevin L. Cope (a1), Charles Crabtree (a2) and Christopher J. Fariss (a2)
Abstract

Until recently, researchers who wanted to examine the determinants of state respect for most specific negative rights (i.e., physical integrity and empowerment rights) needed to rely on data from the CIRI or the Political Terror Scale (PTS). The new Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset offers scholars a potential alternative to the individual human rights variables from CIRI. We analyze a set of key Cingranelli–Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project and V-Dem negative rights indicators, finding unusual and unexpectedly large patterns of disagreement between the two sets. First, we discuss the new V-Dem dataset by comparing it to the disaggregated CIRI indicators, discussing the history of each project, and describing its empirical domain. Second, we identify a set of disaggregated human rights measures that are similar across the two datasets and discuss each project’s measurement approach. Third, we examine how these measures compare to each other empirically, showing that they diverge considerably across both time and space. These findings point to several important directions for future work, such as how conceptual approaches and measurement strategies affect rights scores. For the time being, our findings suggest that researchers should think carefully about using the measures as substitutes.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: ccrabtr@umich.edu
References
Hide All
Carroll, JB (1961) The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 26(4), 347372.
Cingranelli, DL and Richards, DL (2010) The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Human Rights Quarterly 32(2), 401424.
Cingranelli, DL, Richards, DL and Clay, KC (2015) ‘The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual Version 2014.04.14’. Available at http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html, accessed 12 March 2017.
Conrad, CR, Haglund, J and Moore, WH (2013) Disaggregating torture allegations: introducing the ill-treatment and torture (ITT) country-year data. International Studies Perspectives 14(2), 199220.
Cope, KL and Creamer, C (2016) Disaggregating the human rights treaty regime. Virginia Journal of International Law 55, 459480.
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Fish, S, Hicken, A, Kroenig, M, Lindberg, SI, McMann, K, Paxton, P and Semetko, HA (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: a new approach. Perspectives on Politics 9(02), 247267.
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Fish, MS, Hicken, A, Kroenig, M, Lindberg, SI, McMann, K, Paxton, P, Semetko, HA, Skaaning, S-E, Staton, J and Teorell, J (2015) “V-Dem Dataset v5.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Available at https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-5/
Fariss, CJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability in human rights documents. American Political Science Review 108(2), 297318.
Goldstein, RJ (1978) Political Repression in Modern America, From 1870 to Present. Cambridge, MA: G. K. Hall.
Hathaway, OA (2002) Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal 111(8), 19352042.
Hill, DW Jr and Jones, ZM (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. American Political Science Review 108(3), 661687.
Keith, LC (2012) Political Repression Courts and the Law. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Landman, T (2004) Measuring human rights: principle, practice, and policy. Human Rights Quarterly 26(4), 906931.
Lee Rodgers, J and Nicewander, WA (1988) Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 42(1), 5966.
McDonnell, M-HM, Nordgren, LF and Loewenstein, G (2011) Torture in the eyes of the beholder: the psychological difficulty of defining torture in law and policy. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 44(2011), 87122.
Pemstein, D, Marquardt, KL, Tzelgov, E, Wang, Y-T and Miri, F (2015) ‘The V-Dem measurement model: latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data’. Working Paper. Available at http://www.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3167764.
Pemstein, D, Meserve, SA and Melton, J (2010) Democratic compromise: a latent variable analysis to ten measure of regime type. Political Analysis 18(4), 426449.
Schnakenberg, KE and Fariss, CJ (2014) Dynamic patterns of human rights practices. Political Science Research and Methods 2(1), 131.
Waldron, J (2005) Torture and positive law: jurisprudence for the White House. Columbia Law Review 105(6), 16811750.
Wood, RM and Gibney, M (2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): a re-introduction and comparison. Human Rights Quarterly 32(2), 367400.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Cope et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (89 KB)
89 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed