Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Preferences, Problems and Representation

Abstract

Scholars studying opinion representation often rely on a survey question that asks about the “most important problem” (MIP) facing the nation. While it is known that MIP responses reflect public priorities, less is known about their connection to policy preferences. This article directly addresses the issue. First, it conceptualizes policy preferences and MIP responses, specifically considering the possibility that the latter may be either policy or outcome based. Second, using aggregate-level data from the United States and the United Kingdom, it then examines the correspondence between public spending preferences and MIP responses over time. The results indicate that MIP responses and spending preferences tap very different things, and that using MIP responses substantially understates the representational relationship between public opinion and policy.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Will Jennings is Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom (w.j.jennings@soton.ac.uk). Christopher Wlezien is Hogg Professor of Government, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1704 USA (wlezien@austin.utexas.edu). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Group of the UK Political Studies Association, Oxford, 2012; the Annual Meeting of the Comparative Agendas Project, Antwerp, 2013; and the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, 2015. We are grateful to Shaun Bevan, Christian Breunig, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Bryan Jones, Peter Mortensen and the anonymous reviewers as well as our editor, Vera Troeger, for their constructive comments. Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.3.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John Bartle , and Samantha Laycock . 2012. ‘Telling More Than They Can Know? Does the Most Important Issue Really Reveal What is Most Important to Voters?Electoral Studies 31(4):679688.

Paul Burstein . 2003. ‘The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda’. Political Research Quarterly 56(1):2940.

Brandice Canes-Wrone . 2001. ‘The President’s Legislative Influence from Public Appeals’. American Journal of Political Science 45(2):313329.

Laura Chaqués Bonafont , and Anna M. Palau . 2011. ‘Assessing the Responsiveness of Spanish Policymakers to the Priorities of their Citizens’. West European Politics 34(4):706730.

Harold D. Clarke , David Sanders , Marianne C. Stewart , and Paul Whiteley . 2009. ‘The American Voter’s British Cousin’. Electoral Studies 28(4):632641.

Jeffrey E Cohen . 1997. Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making: The Publics and the Policies that Presidents Choose. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

John G Geer . 1991. ‘Do Open-Ended Questions Measure “Salient” Issues?Public Opinion Quarterly 55:360370.

Sara B. Hobolt , and Robert Klemmensen . 2005. ‘Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark’. Political Studies 53(2):379402.

Sara B. Hobolt , and Robert Klemmensen . 2008. ‘Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective’. Comparative Political Studies 41(3):309337.

Christopher Hood , Henry Rothstein , and Robert Baldwin . 2001. The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John Hudson . 1994. ‘Granger Causality, Rational Expectations and Aversion to Unemployment and Inflation’. Public Choice 80(1/2):921.

Will Jennings , and Christopher Wlezien . 2011. ‘Distinguishing Between Most Important Problems and Issues’. Public Opinion Quarterly 75:545555.

Will Jennings , and Peter John . 2009. ‘The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom’. American Journal of Political Science 53(4):838854.

Peter John . 2006. ‘Explaining Policy Change: The Impact of the Media, Public Opinion and Political Violence on Urban Budgets in England’. Journal of European Public Policy 13(7):10531068.

Bryan D. Jones , and Frank R. Baumgartner . 2004. ‘Representation and Agenda Setting’. Policy Studies Journal 32(1):124.

Bryan D. Jones , Heather Larsen-Price , and John Wilkerson . 2009. ‘Representation and American Governing Institutions’. Journal of Politics 71(1):277290.

Jeffrey Lax , and Justin Phillips . 2012. ‘The Democratic Deficit in the States’. American Journal of Political Science 56(1):148166.

Gert-Jan Lindeboom . 2012. ‘Public Priorities in Government’s Hands: Corresponding Policy Agendas in the Netherlands?Acta Politica 47(4):443467.

Michael D. McDonald , Ian Budge , and Paul Pennings . 2005. ‘Choice Versus Sensitivity: Party Reactions to Public Concerns’. European Journal of Political Research 43(6):845868.

Alan Monroe . 1979. ‘Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions’. American Politics Quarterly 7(1):319.

François Petry . 1999. ‘The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada’. Journal of Politics 61(2):541551.

Stuart Soroka , Christopher Wlezien , and Iain McLean . 2006. ‘Public Expenditure in the UK: How Measures Matter’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169:255271.

Sebastián Valenzuela . 2011. ‘Politics Without Citizens? Public Opinion, Television News, the President, and Real-World Factors in Chile, 2000-2005’. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16(3):357381.

Christopher Wlezien . 1995. ‘The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending’. American Journal of Political Science 39:9811000.

Christopher Wlezien . 2004. ‘Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy’. The Journal of Politics 66(1):124.

Christopher Wlezien . 2005. ‘On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with “Most Important Problem”’. Electoral Studies 24(4):555579.

Christopher Wlezien , and Stuart Soroka . 2012. ‘Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link’. West European Politics 35:14071432.

Shaun Bevan , and Will Jennings . 2014. ‘Representation, Agendas and Institutions’. European Journal of Political Research 53(1):3756.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Jennings and Wlezien supplementary material
Tables S1 and S2

 Word (26 KB)
26 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 252 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.