Skip to main content
×
Home

Preferences, Problems and Representation

Abstract

Scholars studying opinion representation often rely on a survey question that asks about the “most important problem” (MIP) facing the nation. While it is known that MIP responses reflect public priorities, less is known about their connection to policy preferences. This article directly addresses the issue. First, it conceptualizes policy preferences and MIP responses, specifically considering the possibility that the latter may be either policy or outcome based. Second, using aggregate-level data from the United States and the United Kingdom, it then examines the correspondence between public spending preferences and MIP responses over time. The results indicate that MIP responses and spending preferences tap very different things, and that using MIP responses substantially understates the representational relationship between public opinion and policy.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Will Jennings is Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom (w.j.jennings@soton.ac.uk). Christopher Wlezien is Hogg Professor of Government, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1704 USA (wlezien@austin.utexas.edu). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Group of the UK Political Studies Association, Oxford, 2012; the Annual Meeting of the Comparative Agendas Project, Antwerp, 2013; and the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, 2015. We are grateful to Shaun Bevan, Christian Breunig, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Bryan Jones, Peter Mortensen and the anonymous reviewers as well as our editor, Vera Troeger, for their constructive comments. Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.3.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Achen Christopher H. 1990. ‘What Does “Explained Variance” Explain? Reply’. Political Analysis 2(1):173184.
Bafumi Joseph, and Herron Michael C.. 2010. ‘Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Members of Congress’. American Political Science Review 104(3):519542.
Bartle John, and Laycock Samantha. 2012. ‘Telling More Than They Can Know? Does the Most Important Issue Really Reveal What is Most Important to Voters?Electoral Studies 31(4):679688.
Bartle John, Dellepiane-Avellaneda Sebastian, and Stimson James A.. 2011. ‘The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005’. British Journal of Political Science 41(2):259285.
Baumgartner Frank R., and Jones Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bertelli Anthony M., and John Peter. 2013. ‘Public Policy Investment: Risk and Return in British Politics’. British Journal of Political Science 43(4):741773.
Bevan Shaun, and Jennings Will. 2014. ‘Representation, Agendas and Institutions’. European Journal of Political Research 53(1):3756.
Burstein Paul. 2003. ‘The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda’. Political Research Quarterly 56(1):2940.
Canes-Wrone Brandice. 2001. ‘The President’s Legislative Influence from Public Appeals’. American Journal of Political Science 45(2):313329.
Chaqués Bonafont Laura, and Palau Anna M.. 2011. ‘Assessing the Responsiveness of Spanish Policymakers to the Priorities of their Citizens’. West European Politics 34(4):706730.
Clarke Harold D., Sanders David, Stewart Marianne C., and Whiteley Paul. 2009. ‘The American Voter’s British Cousin’. Electoral Studies 28(4):632641.
Cohen Jeffrey E. 1997. Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making: The Publics and the Policies that Presidents Choose. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Durr Robert H. 1993. ‘What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87:158170.
Erikson Robert S., and Tedin Kent L.. 2010. American Public Opinion. New York: Longman.
Erikson Robert S., MacKuen Michael B., and Stimson James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geer John G. 1991. ‘Do Open-Ended Questions Measure “Salient” Issues?Public Opinion Quarterly 55:360370.
Hibbs Douglas A. 1979. ‘The Mass Public and Macro-Economic Policy: The Dynamics of Public Opinion Towards Unemployment and Inflation’. American Journal of Political Science 2(3):705731.
Hobolt Sara B., and Klemmensen Robert. 2005. ‘Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark’. Political Studies 53(2):379402.
Hobolt Sara B., and Klemmensen Robert. 2008. ‘Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective’. Comparative Political Studies 41(3):309337.
Hobolt Sara B., Klemmensen Robert, and Pickup Mark. 2008. ‘The Dynamics of Issue Diversity in Party Rhetoric’. Working Paper No. 3, Oxford Centre for the Study of Inequality and Democracy.
Hood Christopher, Rothstein Henry, and Baldwin Robert. 2001. The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hudson John. 1994. ‘Granger Causality, Rational Expectations and Aversion to Unemployment and Inflation’. Public Choice 80(1/2):921.
Jennings Will. 2009. ‘The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994–2007’. British Journal of Political Science 39(4):847870.
Jennings Will, and Wlezien Christopher. 2011. ‘Distinguishing Between Most Important Problems and Issues’. Public Opinion Quarterly 75:545555.
Jennings Will, and John Peter. 2009. ‘The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom’. American Journal of Political Science 53(4):838854.
John Peter. 2006. ‘Explaining Policy Change: The Impact of the Media, Public Opinion and Political Violence on Urban Budgets in England’. Journal of European Public Policy 13(7):10531068.
Jones Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jones Bryan D., and Baumgartner Frank R.. 2004. ‘Representation and Agenda Setting’. Policy Studies Journal 32(1):124.
Jones Bryan D., and Baumgartner Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jones Bryan D., Larsen-Price Heather, and Wilkerson John. 2009. ‘Representation and American Governing Institutions’. Journal of Politics 71(1):277290.
King Anthony, and Wybrow Robert. 2001. British Political Opinion 1937–2000. London: Politicos.
Lax Jeffrey, and Phillips Justin. 2012. ‘The Democratic Deficit in the States’. American Journal of Political Science 56(1):148166.
Lindeboom Gert-Jan. 2012. ‘Public Priorities in Government’s Hands: Corresponding Policy Agendas in the Netherlands?Acta Politica 47(4):443467.
McDonald Michael D., Budge Ian, and Pennings Paul. 2005. ‘Choice Versus Sensitivity: Party Reactions to Public Concerns’. European Journal of Political Research 43(6):845868.
Monroe Alan. 1979. ‘Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions’. American Politics Quarterly 7(1):319.
Page Benjamin I., Bartels Larry M., and Seawright Jason. 2013. ‘Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans’. Perspectives on Politics 11(1):5173.
Page Benjamin I., and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1983. ‘Effects of Public Opinion on Policy’. American Political Science Review 77:175190.
Petry François. 1999. ‘The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada’. Journal of Politics 61(2):541551.
Soroka Stuart. 2002. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Soroka Stuart, and Wlezien Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: The Public, Politics and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soroka Stuart, Wlezien Christopher, and McLean Iain. 2006. ‘Public Expenditure in the UK: How Measures Matter’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169:255271.
Stimson James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Stokes Donald. 1963. ‘Spatial Models and Party Competition’. American Political Science Review 57(2):368377.
Valenzuela Sebastián. 2011. ‘Politics Without Citizens? Public Opinion, Television News, the President, and Real-World Factors in Chile, 2000-2005’. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16(3):357381.
Wlezien Christopher. 1995. ‘The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending’. American Journal of Political Science 39:9811000.
Wlezien Christopher. 2004. ‘Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy’. The Journal of Politics 66(1):124.
Wlezien Christopher. 2005. ‘On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with “Most Important Problem”’. Electoral Studies 24(4):555579.
Wlezien Christopher, and Soroka Stuart. 2012. ‘Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link’. West European Politics 35:14071432.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Jennings and Wlezien supplementary material
Tables S1 and S2

 Word (26 KB)
26 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 345 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.