Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Quitting globalization: trade-related job losses, nationalism, and resistance to FDI in the United States

  • Yilang Feng (a1), Andrew Kerner (a2) and Jane L. Sumner (a3)

Abstract

Existing research has found that American politicians benefit from trying to attract investment and creates jobs. In this paper, we build on this work by describing the drivers of Americans' attitudes toward inward foreign investment (FDI). We posit that foreign and Chinese investment are different than domestic investment in the public imagination and that nationalism and proximity to deindustrialization interact to shape public opinion about them. We propose and test two theories of this interaction using a survey experiment that randomizes whether a respondent is responding to a statement about “business investment,” “foreign business investment,” or “Chinese business investment”. We find that (1) Americans are skeptical of business investments by Chinese, and, to lesser degree, “foreign” firms; (2) the gap in enthusiasm for generic business investment and foreign/Chinese business investment rises with local trade-related job losses; and (3) the distinction between nationalists' and non-nationalists' attitudes toward FDI declines in local job losses.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: jlsumner@umn.edu

References

Hide All
Acemoglu, D, Autor, D, Dorn, D, Hanson, GH and Price, B (2016) Import competition and the great US employment sag of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics 34, S141S198.
Autor, DH, Dorn, D, Hanson, GH and Song, J (2014) Trade adjustment: worker-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, 17991860.
Autor, DH, Dorn, D and Hanson, GH (2016) The China shock: learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 205240.
Autor, DH, Dorn, D and Hanson, GH (2017) When work disappears: manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of men (No. 23173). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w23173.
Baughn, CC and Yaprak, A (1996) Economic nationalism: conceptual and empirical development. Political Psychology 17, 759778.
Bobo, L (1983) Whites' opposition to busing: symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 1196.
Brief, AP, Umphress, EE, Dietz, J, Burrows, JW, Butz, RM and Scholten, L (2005) Community matters: realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal 48, 830844.
Che, Y, Lu, Y, Pierce, JR, Schott, PK and Tao, Z (2016) Trade Liberalization with China Influence US Elections? (No. w22178). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22178.
Corasaniti, N, Burns, A and Appelbaum, B (2016) Donald Trump vows to rip up trade deals and confront China, N.Y.. TIMES (28 June, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/donald-trump-trade-speech.html.
Dutt, P and Mitra, D (2005) Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 5972.
Feigenbaum, JJ and Hall, AB (2015) How legislators respond to localized economic shocks: evidence from Chinese import competition. The Journal of Politics 77, 10121030.
Filindra, A and Pearson-Merkowitz, S (2013) Together in good times and bad? How economic triggers condition the effects of intergroup threat. Social Science Quarterly 94, 13281345.
Greenberg, S and Zdunkewicz, N (2016) Public anger about corporate power dominant factor in views on trade & TPP. Available at https://www.citizen.org/sites/default/files/greenberg-polling-memo-july-2016.pdf.
Guisinger, A (2014) Racial diversity and redistribution: Explaining (white) Americans’ continued support for trade protection. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Washington DC.
Hiscox, MJ (2006) Through a glass and darkly: attitudes toward international trade and the curious effects of issue framing. International Organization 60, 755778.
Jackson, JW (1993) Realistic group conflict theory: a review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record. 43, 395415.
Jensen, NM and Lindstädt, R (2013) Globalization with whom: context-dependent foreign direct investment preferences. Working Paper.
Jensen, NM and Malesky, EJ (2018) Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, JB, Quinn, DP and Weymouth, S (2017) Winners and losers in international trade: The effects on US presidential voting. International Organization 71(3), 423457.
Kerner, A, Sumner, JL and Richter, BK (2017) Exposure to Chinese offshoring and support for free trade. Working Paper.
LeVine, RA and Campbell, DT (1972) Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior. Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons.
Macesich, G (1985) Economic Nationalism and Stability. New York, NY: Prager.
Mansfield, ED and Mutz, DC (2009) Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization 63, 425457.
Mansfield, ED and Mutz, DC (2013) US versus them: mass attitudes toward offshore outsourcing. World Politics 65, 571608.
Margalit, Y (2011) Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in U.S. elections. American Political Science Review 105, 166188.
Pandya, SS (2010) Labor markets and the demand for foreign direct investment. International Organization 64, 389409.
Pandya, SS (2014) Trading Spaces: Foreign Direct Investment Regulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19702000.
Pandya, SS (2016) Political economy of foreign direct investment: globalized production in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 455475.
Paquette, D (2017) 18 September, 2017 Los Angeles Times, Wisconsin governor signs bill offering Foxconn $3 billion in tax credits.Available at http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-foxconn-wisconsin-20170918-story.html.
Pierce, JR and Schott, PK (2016 a) Trade liberalization and mortality: evidence from US counties (No. w22849). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Pierce, JR and Schott, PK (2016 b) The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. American Economic Review 106, 16321662.
Pinto, PM (2013) Partisan Investment in the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
Pinto, PM and Pinto, SM (2008) The politics of investment partisanship and the sectoral allocation of foreign direct investment. Economic and political 20, 216254.
Rho, S and Tomz, M (2017) Why don't trade preferences reflect economic self-interest? International Organization 71, S85S108.
Rosen, D and Haneman, T (2017) New neighbors 2017 update: Chinese FDI in the United States by Congressional district Rhodium Group. Available at http://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/RHG_New-Neighbors_2017-Update_Reduced.pdf Rhodium Group. China Investment Monitor. Available at http://cim.rhg.com.
Rosen, D, Hanneman, T and Gao, C (2016) Two-way street: 2017 update Rhodium Group. Available at http://rhg.com/reports/two-way-street-2017-update.
Sabet, S (2016) Feelings first: non-material factors as moderators of economic self-interest effects on trade preferences. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. Available at http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ssabet/files/sabet_feelings_first_.pdf.
Scheve, K and Slaughter, MJ (2004) Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. The American Journal of Political Science 48, 662674.
The Economist (2016) What the world thinks about globalization. Available at https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/11/daily-chart-12.
Tingley, D, Xu, C, Chilton, A and Milner, HV (2015) The political economy of inward FDI: opposition to Chinese mergers and acquisitions. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, 2757.
Zárate, MA, Garcia, B, Garza, AA and Hitlan, RT (2004) Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40, 99105.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Feng et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
WORD
Supplementary materials

Feng et al. supplementary material
Feng et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (37 KB)
37 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed