Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues*


A large literature argues that public opinion is vulnerable to various types of framing and cue effects. However, we lack evidence on whether existing findings, which are typically based on lab experiments involving low-salience issues, travel to salient and contentious political issues in real-world voting situations. We examine the relative importance of issue frames, partisan cues, and their interaction for opinion formation using a survey experiment conducted around a highly politicized referendum on immigration policy in Switzerland. We find that voters responded to frames and cues, regardless of their direction, by increasing support for the position that is in line with their pre-existing partisan attachment. This reinforcement effect was most visible among low knowledgeable voters that identified with the party that owned the issue. These results support some of the previous findings in the political communication literature, but at the same time also point toward possible limits to framing effects in the context of salient and contested policy issues.

Hide All

Michael M. Bechtel, SNSF Research Professor, Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, Rosenbergstr. 51, CH-9000 St.Gallen ( Jens Hainmueller, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 616 Serra Street, Stanford, 94305 ( Dominik Hangartner, Associate Professor, Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE and Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstr. 56, CH-8050 Zurich ( Marc Helbling. full professor in political science at the University of Bamberg and senior resarcher at WZB Berlin Social Science Center Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785 Berlin ( The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the WZB Berlin Social Research Center. Michael M. Bechtel gratefully acknowledges support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #PP00P1-139035). The authors thank Judith Spirig for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lene Aaroe . 2012. ‘When Citizens Go Against Elite Directions: Partisan Cues and Contrast Effects on Citizens’ Attitudes’. Party Politics 18(2):215233.

Richard D. Alba , Ruben G. Rumbaut , and Karen Marotz . 2005. ‘A Distorted Nation: Perceptions of Racial/Ethnic Group Sizes and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Other Minorities’. Social Forces 84(2):901919.

Kevin Arceneaux , and Robin Kolodny . 2009. ‘Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign’. American Journal of Political Science 53(4):755770.

Larry M. Bartels 2000. ‘Partisanship and Voting Behavior 1952-1996’. American Journal of Political Science 44(1):3550.

Ted Chiricos , Michael Hogan , and Marc Gertz . 1997. ‘Racial Composition of the Neighborhood and Fear of Crime’. Criminology 35(1):107129.

Dennis Chong , and James N. Druckman . 2007b. Framing Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science 10:103126.

Jack Citrin , and John Sides . 2008. ‘Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States’. Political Studies 56(1):3356.

J. N. Druckman 2001a. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence’. Political Behavior 23(3):225256.

J. N. Druckman . 2001b. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?Journal of Politics 63(4):10411066.

James N. Druckman , Cari L. Hennessy , Kristi St. Charles , and Jonathan Webber . 2010. ‘Competing Rhetoric Over Time: Frames Versus Cues’. Journal of Politics 72(1):136148.

James N. Druckman , and Thomas J. Leeper . 2012. ‘Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and its Effects’. American Journal of Political Science 56(4):875896.

James N. Druckman , and Arthur Lupia . 2000. ‘Preference Formation’. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1):124.

Todd K. Hartman , and Christopher R. Weber . 2009. ‘Who Said What? The Effects of Sources Cues in Issue Frames’. Political Behavior 31(4):537558.

Simon Hug . 2011. ‘Policy Consequences of Direct Legislation Theory, Empirical Models and Evidence’. Quality and Quantity 45(3):559578.

Jerit Jerit , and Jason Barabas . 2012. ‘Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment’. Journal of Politics 74(3):672684.

Hanspeter Kriesi . 2002. ‘Individual Opinion Formation in a Direct Democratic Campaign’. British Journal of Political Science 32(1):171185.

Matthew J. Lebo , and Daniel Cassino . 2007. ‘The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval’. Political Psychology 28(6):719746.

Sophie Lecheler , Claed H. de Vreese , and Rune Slothuus . 2009. ‘Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects’. Communication Research 36(3):400425.

Arthur Lupia , and Jesse O. Menning . 2009. ‘When Can Politicians Scare Citizens Into Supporting Bad Policies?American Journal of Political Science 53(1):90106.

Lauren M. McLaren 2001. ‘Immigration and the New Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the European Union: The Effect of Elites and the EU on Individual-Level Opinions Regarding European and Non-European Immigrants’. European Journal of Political Research 39(1):81108.

Richard Nadeau , Richard G. Niemi , and Jeffrey Levine . 1993. ‘Innumeracy About Minority Populations’. Public Opinion Quarterly 57(3):332347.

Stephen P. Nicholson 2011a. Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence’. Journal of Politics 73(4):11651177.

Stephen P. Nicholson 2011b. Polarizing Cues’. American Journal of Political Science 56(1):5266.

Felix Schläpfer . 2011. ‘Access to Party Positions and Preference Formation: A Field Experiment’. Swiss Political Science Review 17(1):7591.

Andreas R. Schuck , and Claes H. de Vreese . 2006. ‘Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement’. European Journal of Communication 21(1):532.

Rune Slothuus . 2010. ‘When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment’. Political Communication 27(2):158177.

Charles S. Taber , and Milton Lodge . 2006. ‘Motivated Scepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs’. American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755769.

Herbert F. Weisberg 1980. ‘A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification’. Political Behavior 2(1):3360.

Cara J. Wong 2007. ‘“Little” and “Big” Pictures in Our Heads: Race, Local Context, and Innumeracy About Racial Groups in the United States’. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(3):392412.

John R. Zaller 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Bechtel supplementary material
Appendices A and B

 PDF (173 KB)
173 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 115 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 358 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.