Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Spatial interdependence and instrumental variable models

  • Timm Betz (a1), Scott J. Cook (a1) and Florian M. Hollenbach (a1)
Abstract

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to address endogeneity concerns. Yet, a specific kind of endogeneity – spatial interdependence – is regularly ignored. We show that ignoring spatial interdependence in the outcome results in asymptotically biased estimates even when instruments are randomly assigned. The extent of this bias increases when the instrument is also spatially clustered, as is the case for many widely used instruments: rainfall, natural disasters, economic shocks, and regionally- or globally-weighted averages. Because the biases due to spatial interdependence and predictor endogeneity can offset, addressing only one can increase the bias relative to ordinary least squares. We demonstrate the extent of these biases both analytically and via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, we discuss a general estimation strategy – S-2SLS – that accounts for both outcome interdependence and predictor endogeneity, thereby recovering consistent estimates of predictor effects.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: fhollenbach@tamu.edu
References
Hide All
Ahmed, FZ (2012) The Perils of Unearned Foreign Income: Aid, Remittances, and Government Corruption. American Political Science Review 106(1), 146165.
Anselin, L Lozano-Gracia, N (2008) Errors in Variables and Spatial Effects in Hedonic House Price Models of Ambient Air Quality. Empirical Economics 34(1), 534.
Ashraf, Q Galor, O (2011) Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch. American Economic Review 101(5), 20032041.
Bartels, LM (1991) Instrumental and “Quasi-Instrumental” Variables. American Journal of Political Science 35(3), 777800.
Beck, N, Gleditsch, KS Beardsley, K (2006) Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1), 2744.
Betz, T (2013) Robust Estimation with Nonrandom Measurement Error and Weak Instruments. Political Analysis 21(1), 8696.
Betz, T, Cook, SJ Hollenbach, F (2018) On the Use and Abuse of Spatial Instruments. Political Analysis 26(4), 474479.
Boix, C (2011) Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review 105(04), 809828.
Bound, J, Jaeger, DA Baker, RM (1995) Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable Is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430), 443450.
Büthe, T Milner, HV (2008) The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements? American Journal of Political Science 52(4), 741762.
Cooperman, AD (2017) Randomization Inference with Rainfall Data: Using Historical Weather Patterns for Variance Estimation. Political Analysis 25(3), 277288.
Drukker, DM, Egger, P Prucha, IR (2013) On Two-Step Estimation of a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances and Endogenous Regressors. Econometric Reviews 32(5-6), 686733.
Fingleton, B Le Gallo, J (2008) Estimating Spatial Models with Endogenous Variables, a Spatial Lag and Spatially Dependent Disturbances: Finite Sample Properties. Papers in Regional Science 87(3), 319339.
Franzese, RJ Jr. Hays, JC (2007) Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. Political Analysis 15(2), 140164.
Franzese, RJ, Hays, JC Cook, SJ (2016) Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes. Political Science Research and Methods 4(1), 151173.
Gleditsch, KS Ward, MD (2006) Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60(4), 911933.
Hansford, TG Gomez, BT (2010) Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout. American Political Science Review 104(02), 268288.
Kelejian, HH Prucha, IR (2004) Estimation of Simultaneous Systems of Spatially Interrelated Cross Sectional Equations. Journal of Econometrics 118(1), 2750.
Kirby, AM Ward, MD (1987) The Spatial Analysis of Peace and War. Comparative Political Studies 20(3), 293313.
LeSage, JP Pace, RK (2014) The Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics. Econometrics 2(4), 217249.
Liu, X Lee, L-F (2013) Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models with Endogenous Regressors and Many Instruments. Econometric Reviews 32(5-6), 734753.
Neumayer, E Plümper, T (2016) W. Political Science Research and Methods 4(1), 175193.
Plümper, T Neumayer, E (2010) Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. European Journal of Political Research 49(3), 418442.
Ramsay, KW (2011) Revisiting the Resource Curse: Natural Disasters, the Price of Oil, and Democracy. International Organization 65(3), 507529.
Simmons, BA, Dobbin, F Garrett, G (2006) Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60(4), 781810.
Siverson, RM Starr, H (1990) Opportunity, Willingness, and the Diffusion of War. American Political Science Review 84(1), 4767.
Sovey, AJ Green, DP (2011) Instrumental Variables Estimation in Political Science: A Readers’ Guide. American Journal of Political Science 55(1), 188200.
Starr, H (1991) Democratic Dominoes: Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2), 356381.
Stasavage, D (2005) Democracy and Education Spending in Africa. American Journal of Political Science 49(2), 343358.
Ward, MD O’Loughlin, J (2002) Spatial Processes and Political Methodology: Introduction to the Special Issue. Political Analysis 10(3), 211216.
Ward, MD Gleditsch, KS (2002) Location, Location, Location: An MCMC Approach to Modeling the Spatial Context of War and Peace. Political Analysis 10(3), 244260.
Wooldridge, JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Betz et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Betz et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (212 KB)
212 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed