Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Voting Behavior in the Council of the European Union: The Effect of the Trio Presidency*


This paper examines the Trio Presidency and its impact on voting behavior in the Council of the European Union. Trios of Member States cooperate for 18-month periods, with each member holding the Presidency for six months. We study whether belonging to the Trio increases the probability that a Member State votes in favor of a measure. We analyze roll call votes on 1038 legislative acts from January 2007 till June 2014. Conducting probit analyses we present evidence that Member States are indeed more likely to vote in favor during their participation in Trios. We show that this results mainly from the Trio’s agenda-setting powers. Moreover, holding the Presidency itself does not further increase the probability of voting in favor.

Hide All

Philippe van Gruisen is a Doctoral Candidate at the Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven ( Pieterjan Vangerven is a Research Fellow at KU Leuven and FWO-Vlaanderen, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven ( Christophe Crombez is Professor of Political Economy at KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven and a Senior Research Scholar at Stanford University Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, 616 Serra street, Stanford, CA 94305. ( C.C. gratefully acknowledges support from the Research Foundation—Flanders (Project G054414N) and the Special Research Fund—KU Leuven (Project 13/020).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Deniz Aksoy . 2010. ‘Who Gets What, When and How Revisted: Voting and Proposal Powers in the Allocation of the EU Budget’. European Union Politics 11(2):171197.

Moreno J Arregui , and Robert Thomson . 2009. ‘States’ Bargaining Success in the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 16(5):655676.

Agnes Batory , and Uwe Puetter . 2013. ‘Consistency and Diversity? The EU’s Rotating Trio Council Presidency After the Lisbon Treaty’. Journal of European Public Policy 20(1):95112.

Christophe Crombez , and Pieterjan Vangerven . 2014. ‘Procedural Models of European Union Politics: Contributions and Suggestions for Improvement’. European Union Politics 15(2):289308.

James Cross . 2013. ‘Everyone’s a Winner (Almost): Bargaining Success in the Council of Ministers of the European Union’. European Union Politics 14(1):7094.

Jonathan Golub . 2012. ‘How the European Union Does Not Work: National Bargaining Success in the Council of Ministers’. Journal of European Public Policy 19(9):12941315.

Frank M Häge . 2011. ‘The European Union Policy-Making Dataset’. European Union Politics 12(3):455477.

Sara Hagemann . 2008. ‘Voting, Statements and Coalition-Building in the Council from 1999 to 2006’. In Naurin, D. and Wallace, H. (eds), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments play in Brussels. 3663. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fiona Hayes-Renshaw , Wim Van Aken , and Helen Wallace . 2006. ‘When and Why the Council of Ministers of the EU Votes Explicitly’. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1):161194.

Simon Hix , and Bjorn Hoyland . 2011. The Political System of the European Union, 3rd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Madeleine Hosli , Mikko Mattila , and Mark Uriot . 2011. ‘Voting in the Council of the European Union After the 2004 Enlargement: A comparison of Old and New Member States’. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(6):12491270.

Mads Dagnis Jensen , and Peter Nedergaard . 2014. ‘Uno, Duo, Trio? Varieties of Trio Presidencies in the Council of Ministers’. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5):10351052.

Mikko Mattila . 2004. ‘Contested Decisions: Empirical Analysis of Voting in the European Union Council of Ministers’. European Journal of Political Research 43(1):2950.

Mikko Mattila . 2012. ‘Resolving Controversies With DEU Data’. European Union Politics 13(3):451461.

Antti Pajala , and Mika Widgrèn . 2004. ‘A Priori Versus Empirical Voting Power in the EU Council of Ministers’. European Union Politics 5(1):7397.

Lucia Quaglia , and Edward Moxon-Browne . 2006. ‘What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland Compared’. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2):349368.

Jelmer Schalk , Rene Torenvlied , Jeroen Weesie , and Frans Stokman . 2007. ‘The Power of the Presidency in EU Council Decision-Making’. European Union Politics 8(2):229250.

Jonas Tallberg . 2010. ‘The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation’. International Studies Quarterly 54:241265.

Robert Thomson . 2008. ‘The Council Presidency in the European Union: Responsibility With Power’. Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3):593617.

Robert Thomson , Jovanka Boerefijn , and Frans Stokman . 2004. ‘Actor Alignments in European Union Decision-Making’. European Journal of Political Research 43(2):237261.

Robert Thomson , and Madeleine Hosli . 2006. ‘Who Has the Power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in Legislative Decision-Making’. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2):391417.

Andreas Warntjen . 2008. ‘The Council Presidency: Power Broker or Burden? An Empirical Analysis’. European Union Politics 9(3):315338.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

van Gruisen supplementary material



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 31 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 160 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 3rd May 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.