Skip to main content

When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys

  • René Lindstädt (a1), Sven-Oliver Proksch (a2) and Jonathan B. Slapin (a3)

Political scientists use expert surveys to assess the latent features of political actors. Experts, though, are unlikely to be equally informed and assess all actors equally well. The literature acknowledges variance in measurement quality but pays little attention to the implications of uncertainty for aggregating responses. We discuss the nature of the measurement problem in expert surveys. We then propose methods to assess the ability of experts to judge where actors stand and to aggregate expert responses. We examine the effects of aggregation for a prominent survey in the literature on party politics and EU integration. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we demonstrate that it is better to aggregate expert responses using the median or modal response, rather than the mean.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Adams, James, Ezrow, Lawrence Somer-Topcu, Zeynep (2014) Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider Information Environment? An Analysis of Mass-Elite Linkages on European Integration. American Journal of Political Science 58(4), 967978.
Aldrich, John H McKelvey, Richard D (1977) A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections. American Political Science Review 71(01), 111130.
Bakker, Ryan, Vries, Catherine de, Edwards, Erica, Hoogh, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Marks, Gary, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco Vachudova, Milada Anna (2015) Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2010. Party Politics 21(1), 143152.
Bakker, Ryan, Edwards, Erica, Jolly, Seth, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan Steenbergen, Marco (2014) Anchoring the Experts: Using Vignettes to Compare Party Ideology Across Countries. Research & Politics 1(3), 2053168014553502.
Benoit, Kenneth Laver, Michael (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bertens, LCM, Broekhuizen, BDL, Naaktgeboren, CA, Rutten, FH, Hoes, AW van Mourik, Y (2013) Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and Reporting. PLoS Med 10(10), e1001531.
Blackwell, Matthew, Honaker, James King, Gary (2015) A Unified Approach to Measurement Error and Missing Data: Overview and Applications. Sociological Methods and Research doi: 10.1177/0049124115589052.
Clinton, Joshua D Lewis, David E (2008) Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences. Political Analysis 16(1), 320.
Druckman, James N Warwick, Paul V (2005) The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 44(1), 1742.
Finn, RH (1970) A Note on Estimating the Reliability of Categorical Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30, 7176.
Gray, Julia Slapin, Jonathan B (2012) How Effective Are Preferential Trade Agreements? Ask the Experts. The Review of International Organizations 7(3), 309333.
Hare, Christopher, Armstrong, David, Bakker, Ryan, Carroll, Royce Poole, Keith T (2015) Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens’ Ideological Preferences and Perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 759774.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Bakker, Ryan, Brigevich, Anna, Vries, Catherine De, Edwards, Erica, Marks, Gary, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco Vachudova, Milada (2010) Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research 49(5), 687703.
James, Lawrence R, Demaree, Robert G Wolf, Gerrit (1984) Assessing Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69(1), 8598.
Kozlowski, Steve WJ Hattrup, Keith (1992) A Disagreement About Within-Group Agreement: Disentangling Issues of Consistency Versus Consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(2), 161167.
LeBreton, James M Senter, Jenell L (2008) Answers to 20 Questions about Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement. Organizational Research Methods 11(4), 815852.
Martinez i Coma, Ferran Ham, Carolien (2015) Can Experts Judge Elections? Testing the Validity of Expert Judgments for Measuring Election Integrity. European Journal of Political Research 54(2), 305325.
Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W Martinez i Coma, Ferran (2013) Assessing the Quality of Elections. Journal of Democracy 24(4), 124135.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver Lo, James (2012) Reflections on the European Integration Dimension. European Union Politics 13(2), 317333.
van der Eijk, Cees (2001) Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales. Quality and Quantity 35(3), 325341.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Lindstädt et al. supplementary material

 PDF (217 KB)
217 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed