Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T18:15:20.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of total scattering data from various sources: the case of a nanometric spinel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

Giorgia Confalonieri ,
Monica Dapiaggi ,
Marco Sommariva ,
Milen Gateshki ,
Andy N. Fitch  and
Andrea Bernasconi
Giorgia Confalonieri*
Affiliation:
University of Milan, Italy
Monica Dapiaggi
Affiliation:
University of Milan, Italy
Marco Sommariva
Affiliation:
PANalytical BV, Almelo, The Netherlands
Milen Gateshki
Affiliation:
PANalytical BV, Almelo, The Netherlands
Andy N. Fitch
Affiliation:
ESRF, Grenoble, France
Andrea Bernasconi
Affiliation:
ESRF, Grenoble, France
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: giorgia.confalonieri@unimi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Total scattering data of nanocrystalline gahnite (ZnAl2O4, 2–3 nm) have been collected with three of the most commonly used instruments: (i) ID31 high-resolution diffractometer at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (Q max = 22 Å−1); (ii) ID11 high-energy beamline at the ESRF (Q max = 26.6 Å−1); and (iii) Empyrean laboratory diffractometer by PANalytical with molybdenum anode X-ray tube (Q max = 17.1 Å−1). Pair distribution functions (PDFs) for each instrument data-set have been obtained, changing some of the parameters, by PDFgetX3 software, with the aim of testing the software in the treatment of different total scattering data. The material under analysis has been chosen for its nanometric (and possibly disordered) nature, to give rise to a challenge for all the diffractometers involved. None of the latter should have a clear advantage. The PDF and F(Q) functions have been visually compared, and then the three PDF sets have been used for refinements by means of PDFgui suite. All the refinements have been made exactly in the same way for the sake of a fair comparison. Small differences could be observed in the experimental PDFs and the derived results, but none of them seemed to be significant.

Keywords

PDFtotal scatteringnanomaterialssynchrotronlaboratory diffractometer

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 30 , Supplement S1 , June 2015 , pp. S65 - S69
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Billinge, S. J. L. and Kanatzidis, M. G. (2004). “Beyond crystallography: the study of disorder, nanocrystallinity and crystallographically challenged materials with pair distribution functions,” Chem. Commun. 749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confalonieri, G. (2013). Local Distortion in Structure of Nanocrystalline Gahnite, Master's Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
Egami, T. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2003a). Underneath the Bragg Peaks: Structural Analysis of Complex Materials (Pergamon Press, Elsevier, Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egami, T. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2003b). Underneath the Bragg Peaks: Structural Analysis of Complex Materials (Pergamon Press, Elsevier, Oxford), 1st ed., p. 117.Google Scholar
Egami, T. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2003c). Underneath the Bragg Peaks: Structural Analysis of Complex Materials (Pergamon Press, Elsevier, Oxford), 1st ed., p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, C. L., Juhás, P., Liu, J. W., Bryndin, D., Božin, E. S., Bloch, J., Proffen, T. H. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2007). “PDFfit2 and PDFgui: computer programs for studying nanostructure in crystals,” J. Phy.: Condens. Matter. 19, 335219.Google ScholarPubMed
Fitch, A. N. (2004). “The high resolution powder diffraction beam line at ESRF,” J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 109, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, R. C., Proffen, T. H., Conradson, S. D. (2006). “Pair distribution function and structure factor of spherical particles,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 094107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhas, P., Davis, T., Farrow, C. L. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2013). “PDFgetX3: a rapid and highly automatable program for processing powder diffraction data into total scattering pair distribution functions,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 560–566.Google Scholar
Labiche, J. C., Mathon, O., Pascarelli, S., Newton, M. A., Ferre, G. G., Curfs, C., Vaughan, G., Homs, A. and Carreira, D. F. (2007). “Invited article: The fast readout low noise camera as a versatile x-ray detector for time resolved dispersive extended x-ray absorption fine structure and diffraction studies of dynamic problems in materials science, chemistry, and catalysis,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 091301.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, S., Della Giusta, A. and Russo, U. (1998). “Cation distribution in natural Zn-aluminate spinels,” Miner. Mag. 62(1), 41–54.Google Scholar
Masadeh, A. S., Božin, E. S., Farrow, C. L., Paglia, G., Juhas, P. and Billinge, S. J. L. (2007). “Quantitative size-dependent structure and strain determination of CdSe nanoparticles using atomic pair distribution function analysis,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 115413.Google Scholar
Reiss, C. A., Kharchenko, A., Gateshki, M. (2012). “On the use of laboratory X-ray diffraction equipment for Pair Distribution Function (PDF) studies,” Z. Kristallogr. 227, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommariva, M. (2013). “Multi-technique approach for nanoparticles characterization on a laboratory X-ray diffractometer,” Solid State Phenom. 203–204, 17–20.Google Scholar
Sommariva, M., Gateshki, M., Bolze, J., Reiss, C. A. and Dapiaggi, M. (2013). “How multipurpose in-house XRD systems can contribute to an efficient use of synchrotron beamlines: from small angle to total scattering experiments,” Oral presentation at SILS Conf., 13 September 2013, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
te Nijenhuis, J., Gateshki, M. and Fransen, M. J. (2009). “Possibilities and limitations of X-ray diffraction using high-energy X-rays on a laboratory system,” Z. Kristallogr. Suppl. 30, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toby, B. H. and Egami, T. (1992). “Accuracy of Pair Distribution Function analysis applied to crystalline and non-crystalline materials,” Acta Crystallogr. A 48, 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar