Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T05:29:31.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SBGBBG: A computer program for strain/stress tensor calculation from X-ray diffraction data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

T. Wieder
T. Wieder
Affiliation:
Fachhochschule Furtwangen, D-78027 VS-Schwenningen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Near-surface triaxial strain/stress states in polycrystalline solids are required for a full tensorial treatment including all elements of the strain/stress tensor. A possible depth dependency of the strain/stress is at best observed by grazing incidence diffraction in Seemann–Bohlin geometry (SBG). The computer program SBGBBG calculates the full strain/stress tensor from X-ray diffraction data measured either in SBG or in Bragg–Brentano geometry (BBG). At present SBGBBG is applicable only on texture-free materials.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 214 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Noyan, I. C., and Cohen, J. B. (1987). Residual Stress (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. J., Valvoda, V., and Rafaja, D. (1992). “X-ray residual stress measurement in TiN, ZrN and HfN films using the Seemann–Bohlin method,” Thin Solid Films 214, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. K., and Gorter, S. (1991). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zendehroud, J., Wieder, T., Thoma, K., and Gärtner, H. (1993). “Tiefenauflösende röntgenographische Dehnungsmessung an TiN-Schichten in Seemann–Bohlin–Geometrie,” Härterei-Technische Mitteilungen 48(1), 41–19.Google Scholar