Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T04:48:57.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray diffraction study of anisotropic state of residual stress after down-cut and up-cut face grinding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Zdenek Pala ,
Nikolaj Ganev  and
Jan Drahokoupil
Zdenek Pala
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Engineering, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Trojanova 13, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
Nikolaj Ganev
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Engineering, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Trojanova 13, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
Jan Drahokoupil
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Engineering, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Trojanova 13, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic and Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Slovance 2, 182 21 Prague 8, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences between up-cut and down-cut grinding are usually not considered since both modes are alternating during conventional face grinding. Nevertheless, there is a pronounced distinction in the fashion of material removal which could lead to unequal states of surface residual stress. By means of X-ray diffraction analysis, ground plates made from three types of steel were investigated in order to compute and compare both macroscopic and microscopic residual stress and domains of coherent scattering. With respect to the main sources of residual stress generation, i.e., plastic and thermal deformation, machining process was carried out in two types of cooling environment. The results indicate significant influence of heat removal since differences between the two grinding modes are virtually nonexistent for liquid cooling, whereas dry grinding results in higher compressive normal residual stresses for down-cut mode in comparison to the up cut.

Keywords

up-cut and down-cut grindingresidual stressmicrostrainsX-ray diffraction
Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Special Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 99 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behnken, H. and Hauk, V. (2002). “Microstresses in surface treated materials,” Mater. Sci. ForumMSFOEP 404–407, 269–274.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Keijser, Th. H., Langford, J. I., Mittemeijer, E. J., and Vogels, A. B. P. (1982). “Use of the Voigt function in a single-line method for the analysis of X-ray diffraction line broadening,” J. Appl. Crystallogr.JACGAR 15, 308–314.10.1107/S0021889882012035Google Scholar
Dölle, H. and Cohen, J. B. (1980). “Residual stresses in ground steels,” Metall. Trans. AMTTABN 11A, 159–164.Google Scholar
Dölle, H., Hauk, V., Jühe, H. H., and Krause, H. (1976). “Zurröntgenographischen ermittlung Dreiachsiger spannungszustände allgemeiner orientierung,” MaterialpruefungMTPRAJ 18, 427–431.Google Scholar
Fuks, M. and Gladkikh, L. (1965). “Some features of an X-ray method of measuring elastic stresses,” Zavod. Lab. 8, 978–983.Google Scholar
Gondi, P., Mattogno, G., Montanari, R., and Silli, A. (1990). “On the origin of the residual stress psi splitting,” Z. Metallkd.ZEMTAE 1990, 570–575.Google Scholar
Hauk, V. and Macherauch, E. (1983). “A useful guide for X-ray stress evaluation,” Adv. X-ray Anal. 27, 81–99.Google Scholar
Hauk, V., Oudelhoven, R. W. M., and Vaessen, G. J. H. (1982). “The state of residual stress in the near surface region of homogeneous and heterogeneous materials after grinding,” Metall. Trans. AMTTABN 13A, 1239–1244.10.1007/BF02645507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, I. and Ganev, N.(2000). Residual Stress and Stress Gradients (Marcel Dekker, New York), pp. 793–811.Google Scholar
Macherauch, E. and Müller, P. (1961). “Das sin kvadrat psi-Verfahren der roentgenographischen Spannungsmessung,” Z. Angew. Phys.ZAPHAX 13, 33–38.Google Scholar
Noyan, I. C. and Cohen, J. B. (1987). Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 20–23.Google Scholar