Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-cx6qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-07T01:14:11.500Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Risk Factors for Injuries in Landslide- and Flood-Affected Populations in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2013

Shreya Agrawal
International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Tisha Gopalakrishnan
International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Yuri Gorokhovich
Lehman College, City University of New York, New York, New York USA
Shannon Doocy*
International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Correspondence: Shannon Doocy, PhD Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N. Wolfe St., Suite E8132 Baltimore, Maryland 21230 USA E-mail



The frequency of occurrence of natural disasters has increased over the past several decades, which necessitates a better understanding of human vulnerability, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper assesses risk factors for injury in the March 2010 floods and landslides in Eastern Uganda, and compares the effects of location, injury type, and severity.


A stratified cluster survey of the disaster-affected populations was conducted five months after onset of the disasters. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to sample 800 households, including 400 affected by floods in Butaleja District and 400 affected by landslides in Bududa District.


Flood- and landslide-affected populations were surveyed in July 2010 using a stratified cluster design. The odds of injury were 65% higher in the flood-affected groups than the landslide-affected groups in a logistic regression (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; P < .001). The injury rate was greater in individuals under 42 years of age, and location of injury was a contributing factor. More people were injured in the flood-affected population as compared with the landslide-affected population, and injuries were more severe.


This study illustrates differences between populations injured by flood and landslide disasters that occurred simultaneously in Eastern Uganda in 2010. In areas where landslides are prone to occur due to massive rainfalls or floods, preventative measures, such as early warning systems and evacuation, are more likely to increase the likelihood of people surviving, while for areas with massive floods, immediate and effective medical attention can save lives and improve injury outcomes.

AgrawalS, GopalakrishnanT, GorokhovichY, DoocyS. Risk Factors for Injuries in Landslide- and Flood-Affected Populations in Uganda. Prehosp Disast Med. 2013;28(4):1-9.

Original Research
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1.Alexander, D. The study of natural disasters, 1977–1997: some reflections on a changing field of knowledge. Disasters. 1997;21(4):284-304.Google Scholar
2.Peacock, W, Morrow, B, Gladwin, H. Hurricane Andrew - Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge; 1997.Google Scholar
3.Pielke, R, Agrawala, S, Bouwer, L. Clarifying the attribution of recent disaster losses: a response to Epstein and McCarthy. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2005;86:1481-1484.Google Scholar
4.World Health Organization. Landslides and floods in Bududa and Butalija districts - Health: Situation Report No. 1.…/uganda_sitrrep_5march2010.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2010.Google Scholar
5.United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Eastern Uganda Landslides and Floods: Situation Report No. 3. Accessed May 9, 2010.Google Scholar
6. Butaleja District Local Government, National Environmental Management Agency (NEMA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)/Poverty and Environment Initiatives (PEI). Butaleja District Environmental Policy, 2009. Accessed June 25, 2012.Google Scholar
7. Butaleja District Local Government, Uganda. Inter-agency Rapid Flood/Water Logging Assessment for 2009. Released March 12, 2010.Google Scholar
8.Guha-Sapir, D. Disasters in Numbers - 2010. Accessed June 25, 2012.Google Scholar
9. Data Depository of the Geographic Information Systems Support Team (DDGISST). Accessed May 20, 2010.Google Scholar
10.National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).TRMM Data. Accessed May 20, 2011.Google Scholar
11.Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP). Columbia University. Accessed May 20, 2010.Google Scholar
12. BBC News Online. Uganda abandons landslide rescue bid for buried June 26, 2012. Accessed June 27, 2012.Google Scholar
13.Bich, T, Quang, L, Ha le, T, Hanh, T, Guha-Sapir, D. Impacts of floods on health: epidemiologic evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Global Health Action. 2011;4:6356.Google Scholar
14.Sanches, C, Tze-San, L, Young, S, Batts, D, Benjamin, J, Malilay, J. Risk factors for mortality during the 2002 landslide in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia. Disasters. 2009;33(4):705-720.Google Scholar