Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T00:47:24.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Complaints in a Rural Emergency Medical Service System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2013

Brian L. Risavi ,
Erik Buzzard  and
Christopher J. Heile
Brian L. Risavi*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residency, UPMC Hamot, Erie, Pennsylvania USA
Erik Buzzard
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residency, UPMC Hamot, Erie, Pennsylvania USA
Christopher J. Heile
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMMCO West Regional EMS Council), Meadville, Pennsylvania USA
*
Correspondence: Brian L. Risavi, DO, FACEP, FAAEM UPMC Hamot, Department of Emergency Medicine 201 State Street Erie, Pennsylvania 16550 USA E-mail risavib@upmc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

The health care industry is increasingly focused on customer service, one aspect of which is dealing with customer complaints. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and nature of complaints against prehospital providers in a rural Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.

Methods

This retrospective study of logged complaints utilized data from May 28, 1999 through September 26, 2008. All complaints were investigated by a single trained staff member of the regional EMS office. He interviewed witnesses, and reviewed statements and other documentation related to the complaints. Each complaint was classified into one of four categories: (1) operational; (2) clinical; (3) educational; or (4) customer service. In addition, each complaint was examined to determine if the grievance was founded. The study was conducted in a seven-county region of western Pennsylvania with a population of 639,641 and more than 3,000 EMS providers.

Results

There were 110 complaints over a nine-year period (approximately 12 per year). Forty were considered unfounded complaints (43%) and 49 persons (45%) had made more than a single complaint. No EMS provider had an EMS certification suspended or revoked based on a clinically-related complaint. The data revealed a substantial number of complaints for which insufficient information was available to allow a conclusion based on reasonable certainty or the degree of certainty expected of a reasonable person evaluating the facts.

Conclusion

One hundred ten complaints were logged for the study EMS program. No complaints violated treatment protocols. Forty complaints were unfounded. There were 49 “repeat” complaints against providers who had previously had complaints made against them.

RisaviBL, BuzzardE, HeileCJ. Analysis of Complaints in a Rural Emergency Medical Service System. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(2):1-3.

Keywords

complaintEMSpatient satisfactionprehospital
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 184 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Colwell, CB, Pons, PT, Pi, R. Complaints against an EMS system. J Emerg Med. 2003;25(4):403-408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Persse, DE, Jarvis, JL, Corpening, J, Harris, B. Customer satisfaction in a large urban fire department emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(1):106-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Curka, PA, Pepe, PE, Zachariah, BS, Gray, GD, Matsumoto, C. Incidence, source, and nature of complaints received in a large, urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(6):508-512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kuisma, M, Määttä, T, Hakala, T, Sivula, T, Nousila-Wiik, M. Customer satisfaction measurement in emergency medical services. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(7):812-815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Parry, J, Hewage, U. Investigating complaints to improve practice and develop policy. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(7):663-669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Montini, T, Noble, AA, Stelfox, HT. Content analysis of patient complaints. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(6):412-420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Griffey, RT, Bohan, JS. Healthcare provider complaints to the emergency department: A preliminary report on a new quality improvement instrument. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(5):344-346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar