Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model

  • Ryan Hodnick (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4) (a5) (a6) (a7), Tony Zitek (a7), Kellen Galster (a7), Stephen Johnson (a8), Bryan Bledsoe (a7) (a8) and Daniel Ebbs (a9)...
Abstract
Abstract Objective

The primary goal of this study was to compare paramedic first pass success rate between two different video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy (DL) under simulated prehospital conditions in a cadaveric model.

Methods

This was a non-randomized, group-controlled trial in which five non-embalmed, non-frozen cadavers were intubated under prehospital spinal immobilization conditions using DL and with both the GlideScope Ranger (GL; Verathon Inc, Bothell, Washington USA) and the VividTrac VT-A100 (VT; Vivid Medical, Palo Alto, California USA). Participants had to intubate each cadaver with each of the three devices (DL, GL, or VT) in a randomly assigned order. Paramedics were given 31 seconds for an intubation attempt and a maximum of three attempts per device to successfully intubate each cadaver. Confirmation of successful endotracheal intubation (ETI) was confirmed by one of the six on-site physicians.

Results

Successful ETI within three attempts across all devices occurred 99.5% of the time overall and individually 98.5% of the time for VT, 100.0% of the time for GL, and 100.0% of the time for DL. First pass success overall was 64.4%. Individually, first pass success was 60.0% for VT, 68.8% for GL, and 64.5% for DL. A chi-square test revealed no statistically significant difference amongst the three devices for first pass success rates (P=.583). Average time to successful intubation was 42.2 seconds for VT, 38.0 seconds for GL, and 33.7 for seconds for DL. The average number of intubation attempts for each device were as follows: 1.48 for VT, 1.40 for GL, and 1.42 for DL.

Conclusion

The was no statistically significant difference in first pass or overall successful ETI rates between DL and video laryngoscopy (VL) with either the GL or VT (adult).

Hodnick R , Zitek T , Galster K , Johnson S , Bledsoe B , Ebbs D . A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):621624.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Ryan Hodnick, DO, NREMT-P University of Nevada School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine 901 Rancho Lane, Suite 135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 USA E-mail: lasvegas.em@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All

Conflicts of interest/funding: Funding for the study was provided by the Valente Fund, University of New Mexico (Albuquerque, New Mexico USA), Department of Emergency Medicine; author RH was associated with the University at the time of the study but is no longer with them. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Wang HE, Seitz SR, Hostler DP, Yealy DM. Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9(2):156-162.
2. Wang HE, Yealy DM. How many attempts are required to accomplish out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation? Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(4):372-377.
3. Wang HE, Yealy DM. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we? Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(6):532-541.
4. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McClusky SA. Early clinical experience with a new video laryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(2):191-198.
5. Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, Lee JY, Lin KJ. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(11):788-795.
6. Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, Keim SM. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2012;42(4):400-405.
7. Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, Sakles JC. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope video laryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):629-634.
8. Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, Cosentino M, Kalin L. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):739-748.
9. Wayne MA, McDonnell M. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(2):278-282.
10. Guyette F, Farrell K, Carlson JN, Callaway CW, Phrampus P. Comparison of video laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003;17(2):111-162.
11. Burnett A, Fransconec R, Wewerka S, et al. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(2):231-238.
12. Jarvis J, McClure S, John D. EMS intubation improves with King Vision video laryngoscopy. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(4):482-489.
13. Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2):212-219.
14. Cierniak M, Timler D, Wieczorek A, Sekalski P, Borkowska N, Gaszynski T. The comparison of the technical parameters in endotracheal intubation devices: the C-MAC, the Vividtrac, the McGrath Mac, and the KingVision. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(4):379-387.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 22 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 325 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th August 2017 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.