Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Emergency Department Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Events: A Systematic Review

  • Saydia Razak (a1), Sue Hignett (a1) and Jo Barnes (a1)
Abstract
Introduction

A Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and explosive (CBRNe) event is an emergency which can result in injury, illness, or loss of life. The emergency department (ED) as a health system is at the forefront of the CBRNe response with staff acting as first receivers. Emergency departments are under-prepared to respond to CBRNe events - recognizing key factors which underlie the ED CBRNe response is crucial to provide evidence-based knowledge to inform policies and, most importantly, clinical practice.

Problem

Challenges in detection, decontamination, and diagnosis are associated with the ED CBRNe response when faced with self-presenting patients.

Methods

A systematic review was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). An in-depth search strategy was devised to identify studies which focused on the ED and CBRNe events. The inclusion criteria were stringent in terms of the environment (ED), participants (first receivers), situation (CBRNe response), and actions (detection, decontamination, and diagnosis). Fifteen databases and topic-specific journals were searched. Studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Papers were thematically coded and synthesized using NVivo 10 (QSR International Ltd, Melbourne, Australia).

Results

Sixty-seven full-text papers were critically appraised using the MMAT; 70% were included (n = 60) as medium- or high-quality studies. Data were grouped into four themes: preparedness, response, decontamination, and personal protective equipment (PPE) problems.

Discussion

This study has recognized the ED as a system which depends on four key factors - preparedness, response, decontamination, and PPE problems - which highlight challenges, uncertainties, inconsistencies, and obstacles associated with the ED CBRNe response. This review suggests that response planning and preparation should be considered at three levels: organizational (policies and procedures); technological (decontamination, communication, security, clinical care, and treatment); and individual (willingness to respond, PPE, knowledge, and competence). Finally, this study highlighted that there was a void specific to detection and diagnosis of CBRNe exposure on self-presenting patients in the ED.

Conclusion:

The review identified concerns for both knowledge and behaviors which suggests that a systems approach would help understand the ED response to CBRNe events more effectively. The four themes provide an evidence-based summary for the state of science in ED CBRNe response, which can be used to inform future policies and clinical procedures.

RazakS, HignettS, BarnesJ. Emergency Department Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Events: A Systematic Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):543549.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Saydia Razak, MSc Loughborough Design School, LDS 2.22 Loughborough University Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK E-mail: s.razak@lboro.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Conflicts of interest: none.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Chilcott, R, Wyke, S. “CBRN incidents.” In: Sellwood C, Wapling, A (eds). Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2016:166-180.
2. Cabinet Office. Civil Contingencies Act 2004: a short guide. 2004:2-12. Essex Web site. https://www.essex.gov.uk/Your-Council/Local-Government-Essex/Documents/15mayshortguide.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2018.
3. Whetzel, E, Walker-Cillo, G, Chan, GK, Trivett, J. Emergency nurse perceptions of individual and facility emergency preparedness. J Emerg Nurs. 2013;39(1):46-52.
4. Leiba, A, Halpern, P, Priel, IE, et al. A terrorist suicide bombing at a nightclub in Tel Aviv: analyzing response to a nighttime, weekend, multi-casualty incident. J Emerg Nurs. 2006;32(4):294-298.
5. Mitchell, CJ, Kernohan, WG, Higginson, R. Are emergency care nurses prepared for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or explosive incidents? Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20(3):151-161.
6. Koenig, KL. Strip and shower: the duck and cover for the 21st Century. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(3):391-394.
7. Bland, D. “Training HazMat Training for Emergency Departments.” In: Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report Incident Response: Industrial Fires. London, UK: Health Protection Agency; 2006:45-58.
8. Smith, B, Bouchoucha, S, Watt, E. “Care in a chair” – the impact of an overcrowded emergency department on the time to treatment and length of stay of self-presenting patients with abdominal pain. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016;29:9-14.
9. Levitin, HW, Siegelson, HJ, Dickinson, S, et al. Decontamination of mass casualties-re-evaluating existing dogma. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(3):200-207.
10. Mcfee, R, Leiken, J. Death by Polonium-210: lessons learned from the murder of former soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2009;18-23.
11. Kaji, AH, Langford, V, Lewis, RJ. Assessing hospital disaster preparedness: a comparison of an on-site survey, directly observed drill performance, and video analysis of teamwork. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(3):195-201.
12. O’Sullivan, TL, Dow, D, Turner, MC, et al. Disaster and emergency management: Canadian nurses’ perceptions of preparedness on hospital front lines. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(3):11-18.
13. Williams, J, Walter, D, Challen, K. Preparedness of emergency departments in Northwest England for managing chemical incidents: a structured interview survey. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7(20):1-5.
14. Anathallee, M, Curphey, A, Beeching, N, Carley, S, Crawford, I, Mackway-Jones, K. Emergency departments (EDs) in the United Kingdom (UK) are not prepared for emerging biological threats and bioterrorism. J Infect. 2007;54(1):12-17.
15. Kollek, D. Canadian emergency department preparedness for a nuclear, biological or chemical event. CJEM. 2003;5(1):18-26.
16. Kotora, JG. An assessment of Chemical, Biological, Radiologic, Nuclear, and Explosive preparedness among emergency department healthcare providers in an inner-city emergency department. J Emerg Manag. 2015;13(5):431-436.
17. Pluye, P, Gagnon, MP, Griffiths, F, Johnson-Lafleur, J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529-546.
18. Niska, RW, Burt, CW. Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003. Adv Data. 2005;(364):1-14.
19. Timm, N, Reeves, S. A mass casualty incident involving children and chemical decontamination. Disaster Manag Response. 2007;5(2):49-55.
20. Masterson, L, Steffen, C, Brin, M, Kordick, MF, Christos, S. Willingness to respond: of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(1):43-49.
21. Jasper, E, Miller, M, Sweeney, B, Berg, D, Feuer, E, Reganato, D. Preparedness of hospitals to respond to a radiological terrorism event as assessed by a full‐scale exercise. J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2005;11(6):11-16.
22. Wong, K, Turner, PS, Boppana, A, et al. Preparation for the next major incident: are we ready? Emerg Med J. 2006;23:709-712.
23. Kollek, D, Cwinn, A. A hospital emergency readiness overview study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):159-165.
24. Schultz, CH, Koenig, KL, Whiteside, M, Murray, R. Development of national standardized all-hazard disaster core competencies for acute care physicians, nurses, and EMS professionals. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(3):196-208.
25. Djalali, A, Della Corte, F, Segond, F, et al. TIER competency-based training course for the first receivers of CBRN casualties. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;24(5):371-376.
26. Klima, DA, Seiler, SH, Peterson, JB, et al. Full-scale regional exercises. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):592-598.
27. Reddy, MC, Paul, SA, Abraham, J, McNeese, M, DeFlitch, C, Yen, J. Challenges to effective crisis management: Using information and communication technologies to coordinate emergency medical services and emergency department teams. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(4):259-269.
28. Zhu, S, Abraham, J, Paul, SA, et al. R-CAST-MED: Applying intelligent agents to support emergency medical decision-making teams. Artif Intell Med Proc. 2007;4594:24-33.
29. Becker, SM, Middleton, SA. Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Public Heal Prep. 2008;2:174-184.
30. Considine, J, Mitchell, B. Chemical, biological and radiological incidents: preparedness and perceptions of emergency nurses. Disasters. 2009;33(3):482-497.
31. Oh, JJ, Yong, R, Ponampalam, R, Anantharman, V, Lim, SH. Mass casualty incident involving pepper spray exposure: impact on the emergency department and management of casualties. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):352-359.
32. Treat, KN, Williams, JM, Furbee, PM, Manley, WG, Russell, FK, Stamper, CD. Hospital preparedness for weapons of mass destruction incidents: an initial assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):562-565.
33. Kollek, D. Canadian emergency department preparedness for a nuclear, biological or chemical event. CJEM. 2003;5(1):18-26.
34. Masterson, Kordick SC. Willingness to respond: a survey of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. Res Forum Abstr. 2004;363(1869):1870.
35. Cone, DC, Cummings, BA. Hospital disaster staffing: if you call, will they come? Am J Disaster Med. 2006;1(1):28-36.
36. Waage, S, Poole, JC, Thorgersen, EB. Rural hospital mass casualty response to a terrorist shooting spree. Br J Surg. 2013;100(9):1198-1204.
37. Durukan, P, Ozdemir, C, Coskun, R, et al. Experiences with endosulfan mass poisoning in rural areas. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009;16(1):53-56.
38. Raiter, Y, Farfel, A, Lehavi, O, et al. Mass casualty incident management, triage, injury distribution of casualties and rate of arrival of casualties at the hospitals: lessons from a suicide bomber attack in downtown Tel Aviv. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(4):225-229.
39. Satterthwaite, PS, Atkinson, CJ. Using “reverse triage” to create hospital surge capacity: Royal Darwin Hospital’s response to the Ashmore Reef disaster. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:160-162.
40. Shah, AA, Rehman, A, Sayyed, RH, et al. Impact of a predefined hospital mass casualty response plan in a limited resource setting with no pre-hospital care system. Injury. 2015;46(1):156-161.
41. Castle, N. Care after chemical, biological, radiation or nuclear events. Emerg Nurse. 2010;18(7):26.
42. Cohen, DC, Sevdalis, N, Patel, V, Taylor, D, Batrick, N, Darzi, AW. Major incident preparation for acute hospitals: current state-of-the-art, training needs analysis, and the role of novel virtual worlds simulation technologies. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(6):1029-1037.
43. Brinker, A, Gray, SA, Schumacher, J. Influence of air-purifying respirators on the simulated first response emergency treatment of CBRN victims. Resuscitation. 2007;74(2):310-316
44. Schumacher, J, Bond, AR, Woodham, V, Buckingham, A, Garnham, F, Brinker, A. Survey of UK health care first responders’ knowledge of personal protective equipment requirements. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(3):254-258.
45. George, G, Ramsay, K, Rochester, M, et al. Facilities for chemical decontamination in accident and emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(5):453-457.
46. Wetter, DC, Daniell, WE, Treser, CD. Hospital preparedness for victims of chemical or biological terrorism. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(5):710-716.
47. Castle, N, Bowen, J, Spencer, N. Does wearing CBRN-PPE adversely affect the ability for clinicians to accurately, safely, and speedily draw up drugs? Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48(6):522-527.
48. Flaishon, R, Sotman, A, Ben-Abraham, R, Rudick, V, Varssano, D, Weinbroum, A. Antichemical protective gear prolongs time to successful airway management: a randomized, crossover study in humans. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(2):260-266.
49. Castle, N, Owen, R, Hann, M, Clark, S, Reeves, D, Gurney, I. Impact of chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear personal protective equipment on the performance of low- and high-dexterity airway and vascular access skills. Resuscitation. 2009;80(11):1290-1295.
50. Whetzel, E, Walker-Cillo, G, Chan, GK, Trivett, J. Emergency nurse perceptions of individual and facility emergency preparedness. J Emerg Nurs. 2013;39(1):46-52.
51. Labrague, LJ, Hammad, K, Gloe, DS, et al. Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. Int Nurs Rev. 2017:1-13.
52. Wilson, JR. Fundamentals of systems ergonomics. Work. 2012;41 (SUPPL.1):3861-3868.
53. Barnett, DJ, Thompson, CB, Errett, NA, et al. Determinants of emergency response willingness in the local public health workforce by jurisdictional and scenario patterns: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):164.
54. Maxwell, C. Hospital organizational response to the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island: implications for future-oriented disaster planning. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(3):275-279.
55. Ochi, S, Tsubokura, M, Kato, S, et al. Hospital staff shortage after the 2011 triple disaster in Fukushima, Japan-an earthquake, tsunamis, and nuclear power plant accident: a case of the Soso district. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):1-12.
56. Ashkenazi, I, Kessel, B, Khashan, T, et al. Precision of in-hospital triage in mass-casualty incidents after terror attacks. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(1):20-23.
57. Malik, ZU, Hanif, MS, Tariq, M, et al. Mass casualty management after a suicidal terrorist attack on a religious procession in Quetta Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2006;16(4):253-256.
58. Schumacher, J, Arlidge, J, Garnham, F, Ahmad, I. A randomized crossover simulation study comparing the impact of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear substance personal protection equipment on the performance of advanced life support interventions. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(5):592-597.
59. Health Protection Agency: CBRN Incidents: Clinical Management & Health Protection. Gov UK Web site. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/340709/Chemical_biological_radiological_and_nuclear_incidents_management.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2018.
60. NHS England Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR): Planning for the management of self-presenting patients in healthcare settings. NHS England Web site. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20161104231146/https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/eprr-chemical-incidents.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2018.
61. Core Standards for Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR). NHS England Web site. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/nhse-core-standards-150506.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2018.
62. Home Office. Initial Operational Response to a CBRN Incident. 2015; http://www.jesip.org.uk/uploads/media/pdf/CBRN JOPs/IOR_Guidance_V2_July_2015.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed May 17, 2018.
63. National Ambulance Resilience Unit. Initial Operational Response for the wider NHS. NARU Web site. https://naru.org.uk/videos/ior-nhs/. Accessed May 16, 2018.
64. Morelli, I, Sabbadini, MG, Bortolin, M. Orthopedic injuries and their treatment in children during earthquakes: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):478-485.
65. Lee, ACK, Booth, A, Challen, K, Gardois, P, Goodacre, S. Disaster management in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of the evidence base. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(1):78-83.
66. Challen, K, Lee, AC, Booth, A, Gardois, P, Woods, HB, Goodacre, SW. Where is the evidence for emergency planning? A scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):542.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Razak et al. supplementary material
Table S2

 Word (33 KB)
33 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed