No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Feasibility of Live Video Feed Transmission from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Medical Surveillance During the 2022 Montreal Marathon
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2023
Abstract
Introduction:
In recent years, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been increasingly used for medical surveillance purposes in mass-gathering events. No studies have investigated the reliability of live video transmission from UAVs for accurate identification of distressed race participants in need of medical attention. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of time during which live medical surveillance UAV video feed was successfully transmitted and considered of sufficient quality to identify acute illness in runners participating in the 2022 Montreal Marathon (Canada).
Methods:
Four UAVs equipped with high-resolution cameras were deployed at two pre-defined high-risk areas for medical incidents located within the last 500 meters of the race. The video footage was transmitted in real-time during four consecutive hours to a remote viewing station where four research assistants monitored it on large screens. Interruptions in live feed transmission and moments with inadequate field of view (FOV) on runners were documented.
Results:
On September 25, 2022, a total of 6,916 athletes ran during the Montreal Marathon and Half Marathon. Out of the eight hours of video footage analyzed (four hours per high-risk area), 91.7% represented uninterrupted live video feed with an adequate view of the runners passing through the high-risk areas. There was a total of 18 live feed interruptions leading to a total interruption time of 22 minutes and 19 seconds (median interruption time of 32 seconds) and eight distinct moments with inadequate FOV on runners which accounted for 17 minutes and 33 seconds (median of 1 minute 47 seconds per moments with inadequate FOV). Active surveillance of drone-captured footage allowed early identification of two race participants in need of medical attention. Appropriate resources were dispatched, and UAV repositioning allowed for real-time viewing of the medical response.
Conclusion:
Live video transmission from UAVs for medical surveillance of runners passing through higher risk segments of a marathon for four consecutive hours is feasible. Live feed interruptions and moments with inadequate FOV could be minimized through practice and additional equipment redundancy.
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
References
Homier, V, de Champlain, F, Nolan, M, Fleet, R. Identification of swimmers in distress using unmanned aerial vehicles: experience at the Mont-Tremblant Ironman Triathlon. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;24(3):451–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, T, Sibley, A, Stryhn, H, Hubloue, I. Comparison of unmanned aerial vehicle technology-assisted triage versus standard practice in triaging casualties by paramedic students in a mass-casualty incident scenario. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, T, Sibley, A, Stryhn, H, Hubloue, I. Comparison of unmanned aerial vehicle technology versus standard practice in identification of hazards at a mass casualty incident scenario by Primary Care Paramedic students. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(5):631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, AK, Jain, TN, Butler, M, et al. Remote scene size-up using an unmanned aerial vehicle in a simulated mass casualty incident. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;23(3):332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homier, V, Brouard, D, Nolan, M, et al. Drone versus ground delivery of simulated blood products to an urban trauma center: the Montreal Medi-drone pilot study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;90(3):515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schierbeck, S, Hollenberg, J, Nord, A, et al. Automated external defibrillators delivered by drones to patients with suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(15):1478–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, C-L, Yang, C-H, Wang, J-H, Liang, C-C. Common running musculoskeletal injuries and associated factors among Recreational Gorge Marathon runners: an investigation from 2013 to 2018 Taroko Gorge Marathons. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, LD, Corwell, B, Berkoff, D. Medical problems of marathon runners. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(5):608–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JH, Malhotra, R, Chiampas, G, et al. Cardiac arrest during long-distance running races. N Eng J Med. 2012;366(2):130–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallstrom, A, Ornato, JP. Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Eng J Med. 2004;351(7):637–646.Google ScholarPubMed
Marenco, JP, Wang, PJ, Link, MS, Homoud, MK, Estes III NA. Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, SH, Yeon, GY, Shon, HW, Choi, HR. Design and control of soft unmanned aerial vehicle S-CLOUD. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 2021;26(1):267–75.Google Scholar
Refaai, MR, Rinku, DR, Thamarai, I, Meera, S, Sripada, NK, Yishak, S. An enhanced drone technology for detecting the human object in the dense areas using a deep learning model. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022;2022:1–12.Google Scholar
Afman, JP, Ciarletta, L, Feron, E, Franklin, J, Gurriet, T, Johnson, EN. Towards a new paradigm of UAV safety. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018;1803.09026.Google Scholar
Johnson, AM, Cunningham, CJ, Arnold, E, Rosamond, WD, Zègre-Hemsey, JK. Impact of using drones in emergency medicine: what does the future hold? Open Access Emerg Med. 2021;13:487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar