Skip to main content
×
Home

On-Scene and Final Assessments and Their Interrelationship Among Patients Who Use the EMS on Multiple Occasions

  • Julia Tärnqvist (a1), Erik Dahlén (a1), Gabriella Norberg (a2), Carl Magnusson (a3), Johan Herlitz (a2) (a4), Anneli Strömsöe (a5), Christer Axelsson (a2) (a3) (a4) and Magnus Andersson Hagiwara (a2)...
Abstract
Abstract Introduction

The use of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is increasing. A number of patients call repeatedly for EMS. Early studies of frequent callers show that they form a heterogenous group.

Problem

There is a lack of research on frequent EMS callers. There is furthermore a lack of knowledge about characteristics and the prehospital assessment of the patients who call for EMS on several occasions. Finally, there is a general lack of knowledge with regard to the association between the prehospital assessment by health care providers and the final diagnosis.

Method

Patients in Skaraborg in Western Sweden, who used the EMS at least four times in 2014, were included, excluding transport between hospitals. Information on the prehospital assessment on-scene and the final diagnosis was collected from the EMS and hospital case records.

Results

In all, 339 individual patients who used the EMS on 1,855 occasions were included, accounting for five percent of all missions. Fifty percent were women. The age range was 10-98 years, but more than 50.0% were in the age range of 70-89 years.

The most common emergency signs and symptoms (ESS) codes on the scene were dyspnea, chest pain, and abdominal pain. The most common final diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eight percent).

Thirteen percent of all cases had a final diagnosis defined as a potentially life-threatening condition. Among these, 22.0% of prehospital assessments were retrospectively judged as potentially inappropriate.

Forty-nine percent had a defined final diagnosis not fulfilling the criteria for a potentially life-threatening condition. Among these cases, 30.0% of prehospital assessments were retrospectively judged as potentially inappropriate.

Conclusion:

Among patients who used EMS on multiple occasions, the most common symptoms on-scene were dyspnea, chest pain, and abdominal pain. The most common final diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In 13.0%, the final diagnosis of a potentially life-threatening condition was indicated. In a minority of these cases, the assessment on-scene was judged as potentially inappropriate.

Tärnqvist J , Dahlén E , Norberg G , Magnusson C , Herlitz J , Strömsöe A , Axelsson C , Andersson Hagiwara M . On-Scene and Final Assessments and Their Interrelationship Among Patients Who Use the EMS on Multiple Occasions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):528535.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Johan Herlitz, MD, PhD School of Health Sciences, Research Centre PreHospen University of Borås, Prehospital Research Centre of Western Sweden Sahlgrenska University Hospital SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden E-mail: johan.herlitz@hb.se
Footnotes
Hide All

Conflicts of interest: none

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Scott J, Strickland AP, Warner K, Dawson P. Frequent callers to and users of emergency medical systems: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(8):684-691.
2. Billings J, Raven MC. Dispelling an urban legend: frequent emergency department users have substantial burden of disease. Health Aff. 2013;32(12):2099-2108.
3. Hansagi H, Olsson M, Sjöberg S, Tomson Y, Göransson S. Frequent use of the hospital emergency department is indicative of high use of other health care services. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):561-567.
4. Martin GB, Stokes-Buzzelli SA, Peltzer-Jones JM, Schultz LR. Ten years of frequent users in an inner-city emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2013;14(3):243-246.
5. Suserud B-O, Svensson L. Prehospital Akutsjukvård. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber; 2009.
6. Department of Health. Tackling demand together: a toolkit for improving urgent and emergency care pathways by understanding increases in 999 demand. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_106925. Accessed June 3, 2015.
7. Hjalte L, Suserud B-O, Herlitz J, Karlberg I. Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for prehospital care. Eur J Emerg Med. 2007;14(3):151-156.
8. Palazzo FF, Warner OJ, Harron M, Sadana A. Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why? J Accid Emerg Med. 1998;15(6):368-370.
9. Norberg G, Wireklint Sundström B, Christensson L, Nyström M, Herlitz J. Swedish Emergency Medical Services’ identification of potential candidates for primary health care: retrospective patient record study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):311-317.
10. Bigham BL, Bull E, Morrison M, et al. Patient safety in Emergency Medical Services: executive summary and recommendations from the Niagara Summit. CJEM. 2011;13(1):13-18.
11. Atack L, Maher J. Emergency medical and health providers’ perceptions of key issues in prehospital patient safety. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(1):95-102.
12. Fairbanks RJ, Crittenden CN, O’Gara KG, et al. Emergency Medical Services provider perceptions of the nature of adverse events and near-misses in out-of-hospital care: an ethnographic view. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(7):633-640.
13. Wang HE, Fairbanks RJ, Shah MN, Abo BN, Yealy DM. Tort claims and adverse events in emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(3):256-262.
14. Suserud B-O. A new profession in the prehospital care field—the ambulance nurse. Nurs Crit Care. 2005;10:269-271.
15. Widgren BR, Jourak M. Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): a new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(6):623-628.
16. Andersson Hagiwara M, Nilsson L, Strömsöe A, Axelsson C, Kängström A, Herlitz J. Patient safety and patient assessment in prehospital care: a study protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(14):1-7.
17. Gustafsson B, Hermerén G, Petersson B. Good Research Practice. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Research Council; 2011.
18. Edwards MJ, Bassett G, Sinden L, Fothergill RT. Frequent callers to the ambulance service: patient profiling and impact of case management on patient utilization of the ambulance service. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(5):392-396.
19. Knowlton A, Weir BW, Hughes BS, et al. Patient demographic and health factors associated with frequent use of Emergency Medical Services in a Midsized City. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(11):1101-1111.
20. Hunt KA, Weber EJ, Showstack JA, Colby DC, Callaham ML. Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(1):1-8.
21. Tangherlini N, Pletcher MJ, Covec MA, Brown JF. Frequent use of Emergency Medical Services by the elderly: a case-control study using paramedic records. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(3):258-264.
22. Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Miller P, Russell S. Repeat EMS transports among elderly emergency department patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002;6(1):6-10.
23. Andersson Hagiwara M, Suserud B-O, Andersson-Gare B, Sjoqvist B, Henricson M, Jonsson A. The effect of a Computerized Decision Support System (CDSS) on compliance with the prehospital assessment process: results of an interrupted time-series study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14(70):1-9.
24. Prekker ME, Feemster LC, Hough CL, et al. The epidemiology and outcome of prehospital respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(5):543-550.
25. Bigham BL, Buick JE, Brooks SC, Morrison M, Shojania KG, Morrison LJ. Patient safety in Emergency Medical Services: a systematic review of the literature. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012;16(1):20-35.
26. Calder L, Forster A, Nelson M, et al. Adverse events among patients registered in high-acuity areas of the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. CJEM. 2010;12(5):421-430.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Tärnqvist supplementary material
Tärnqvist supplementary material 1

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Tärnqvist supplementary material
Tärnqvist supplementary material 2

 Word (13 KB)
13 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Tärnqvist supplementary material
Tärnqvist supplementary material 3

 Word (12 KB)
12 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 531 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th May 2017 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.