Skip to main content
×
Home

Single Rescuer Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask with Removable External Handle: A Randomized Crossover Trial

  • Paul Reed (a1), Baruch Zobrist (a1), Monica Casmaer (a1), Steven G. Schauer (a1), Nurani Kester (a1) and Michael D. April (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Introduction

Ventilation with a bag valve mask (BVM) is a challenging but critical skill for airway management in the prehospital setting.

Hypothesis

Tidal volumes received during single rescuer ventilation with a modified BVM with supplemental external handle will be higher than those delivered using a standard BVM among health care volunteers in a manikin model.

Methods

This study was a randomized crossover trial of adult health care providers performing ventilation on a manikin. Investigators randomized participants to perform single rescuer ventilation, first using either a BVM modified by addition of a supplemental external handle or a standard unmodified BVM (Spur II BVM device; Ambu; Ballerup, Denmark). Participants performed mask placement and delivery of 10 breaths per minute for three minutes, as guided by a metronome. After a three-minute rest period, they performed ventilation using the alternative device. The primary outcome measure was mean received tidal volume as measured by the manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer model; IngMar Medical; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA). Secondary outcomes included subject device preference.

Results

Of 70 recruited participants, all completed the study. The difference in mean received tidal volume between ventilations performed using the modified BVM with external handle versus standard BVM was 20 ml (95% CI, -16 to 56 ml; P=.28). There were no significant differences in mean received tidal volume based on the order of study arm allocation. The proportion of participants preferring the modified BVM over the standard BVM was 47.1% (95% CI, 35.7 to 58.6%).

Conclusions

The modified BVM with added external handle did not result in greater mean received tidal volume compared to standard BVM during single rescuer ventilation in a manikin model.

Reed P , Zobrist B , Casmaer M , Schauer SG , Kester N , April MD . Single Rescuer Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask with Removable External Handle: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):625630.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Michael D. April, MD, DPhil, MSc 3551 Roger Brooke Dr. Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78216 USA E-mail: Michael.D.April@post.harvard.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

Conflicts of interest/disclaimer: The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center (San Antonio, Texas USA), the US Army Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: adult Basic Life Support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-S435.
2. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Part 7: adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
3. Jeong S, Ahn KO, Shin SD. The role of prehospital advanced airway management on outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):2101-2106.
4. Komatsu R, Kasuya Y, Yogo H, et al. Learning curves for bag-and-mask ventilation and orotracheal intubation: an application of the cumulative sum method. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(6):1525-1531.
5. Davidovic L, LaCovey D, Pitetti RD. Comparison of 1- versus 2-person bag-valve-mask techniques for manikin ventilation of infants and children. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):37-42.
6. Joffe AM, Hetzel S, Liew EC. A two-handed jaw-thrust technique is superior to the one-handed “EC-clamp” technique for mask ventilation in the apneic unconscious person. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(4):873-879.
7. Otten D, Liao MM, Wolken R, et al. Comparison of bag-valve-mask hand-sealing techniques in a simulated model. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(1):6-12.
8. Hart D, Reardon R, Ward C, Miner J. Face mask ventilation: a comparison of three techniques. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(5):1028-1033.
9. Amack AJ, Barber GA, Ng PC, Smith TB, April MD. Comparison of ventilation with one-handed mask seal with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(1):12-17.
10. Lee HY, Jeung KW, Lee BK, et al. The performances of standard and ResMed masks during bag-valve-mask ventilation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(2):235-240.
11. Redfern D, Rassam S, Stacey MR, Mecklenburgh JS. Comparison of face masks in the bag-mask ventilation of a manikin. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(2):169-172.
12. Stewart RD, Kaplan R, Pennock B, Thompson F. Influence of mask design on bag-mask ventilation. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14(5):403-406.
13. Wagner-Berger HG, Wenzel V, Stallinger A, et al. Decreasing peak flow rate with a new bag-valve-mask device: effects on respiratory mechanics, and gas distribution in a bench model of an unprotected airway. Resuscitation.. 2003;57(2):193-199.
14. Zobrist B, Casmaer M, April MD. Single rescuer ventilation using a bag-valve mask with internal handle: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(10):1991-1996.
15. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. PLoS Med. 2010;7(3):e1000251.
16. Menegazzi JJ, Winslow HJ. In-vitro comparison of bag-valve-mask and the manually triggered oxygen-powered breathing device. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1(1):29-33.
17. Updike G, Mosesso VN Jr., Auble TE, Delgado E. Comparison of bag-valve-mask, manually triggered ventilator, and automated ventilator devices used while ventilating a non-intubated manikin model. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2(1):52-55.
18. von Goedecke A, Wagner-Berger HG, Stadlbauer KH, et al. Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation. Resuscitation. 2004;63(2):131-136.
19. Zecha-Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger HG, von Goedecke A, Lindner KH, Hormann C. A strategy to optimize the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway. Resuscitation. 2004;61(1):69-74.
20. April MD, Murray BP. Cost-effectiveness analysis appraisal and application: an emergency medicine perspective. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(6):754-768.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th August 2017 - 12th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.