Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The HOME Team: Evaluating the Effect of an EMS-based Outreach Team to Decrease the Frequency of 911 Use Among High Utilizers of EMS

  • Niels Tangherlini (a1), Julian Villar (a2), John Brown (a3), Robert M. Rodriguez (a3), Clement Yeh (a1), Benjamin T. Friedman (a4) and Paul Wada (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Objectives

The San Francisco Fire Department’s (SFFD; San Francisco, California USA) Homeless Outreach and Medical Emergency (HOME) Team is the United States’ first Emergency Medical Services (EMS)-based outreach effort using a specially trained paramedic to redirect frequent users of EMS to other types of services. The effectiveness of this program at reducing repeat use of emergency services during the first seven months of the team’s existence was examined.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of EMS use frequency and demographic characteristics of frequent users was conducted. Clients that used emergency services at least four times per month from March 2004 through May 2005 were contacted for intervention. Patterns for each frequent user before and after intervention were analyzed. Changes in EMS use during the 15-month study interval was the primary outcome measurement.

Results

A total of 59 clients were included. The target population had a median age of 55.1 years and was 68% male. Additionally, 38.0% of the target population was homeless, 43.4% had no primary care, 88.9% had a substance abuse disorder at time of contact, and 83.0% had a history of psychiatric disorder. The HOME Team undertook 320 distinct contacts with 65 frequent users during the study period. The average EMS use prior to HOME Team contact was 18.72 responses per month (SD=19.40), and after the first contact with the HOME Team, use dropped to 8.61 (SD=10.84), P<.001.

Conclusion

Frequent users of EMS suffer from disproportionate comorbidities, particularly substance abuse and psychiatric disorders. This population responds well to the intervention of a specially trained paramedic as measured by EMS usage.

Tangherlini N , Villar J , Brown J , Rodriguez RM , Yeh C , Friedman BT , Wada P . The HOME Team: Evaluating the Effect of an EMS-based Outreach Team to Decrease the Frequency of 911 Use Among High Utilizers of EMS. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(6):603607.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Niels Tangherlini, EMTP, BA San Francisco Fire Department EMS Division San Francisco, California USA E-mail: niels.tangherlini@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1. McCaigLF, BurtCW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25; (320):1-34.
2. NiskaR, BhuiyaF, XuJ. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Aug 6; (26):1-31.
3. HuntKA, WeberEJ, ShowstackJA, ColbyDC, CallahamML. Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(1):1-8.
4. TangherliniN, PletcherM, CovecM, BrownJ. Frequent use of Emergency Medical Services by the elderly. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(3):258-264.
5. ShahMN, GlushakK, KarrisonTH, et al. Predictors of Emergency Medical Services utilization by elders. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(1):52-58.
6. South Carolina Public Health Institute. A report on frequent users of hospital emergency departments in South Carolina. Columbia, South Carolina USA: SCPHI; February 2011.
7. WeissSJ, ErnstA, MillerP, RusselS. Repeat EMS transports among elderly emergency department patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002;6(1):6-10.
8. LaCalleE, RabinE. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):42-48.
9. MartinezJD, BurtM. Impact of permanent supportive housing on the use of acute care health services by homeless adults. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(7):992-999.
10. ByrneM, MurphyA, PlunkettP, McGeeH, MurphyA, BuryG. Frequent attenders to an emergency department: a study of primary health care use, medical profile, and psychosocial characteristics. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(3):309-318.
11. OwensPL, MutterR, StocksC. Mental health and substance abuse-related emergency department visits among adults 2007: statistical brief #92. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, Maryland USA: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US); February 2006-July 2010.
12. LarkinGL, ClaasenCA, PelletierAJ, CamergoCAJr. National study of ambulance transports to United States emergency departments; importance of mental health problems. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(2):82-90.
13. ShumwayM, BoccellariA, O’BrienK, OkinR. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(2):155-164.
14. OkinR, BoccellariA, AzocarF, et al. The effects of clinical case management on hospital service use among ED frequent users. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(5):603-608.
15. PopeD, FernandesC, BouthilletteF, EtheringtonJ. Frequent users of the emergency department: a program to improve care and reduce visits. CMAJ. 2000;162(7):1017-1020.
16. RinkeM, DietrichE, KodeckT, WestcoatK. Operation care: a pilot case management intervention for frequent emergency medical system users. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(2):352-357.
17. LoneckB, GarrettJA, BanksSM. A comparison of the Johnson Intervention with four other methods of referral to outpatient treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1996;22(2):233-246.
18. GilbertE, LowensteinS, Kazial-McLainJ, BartaD, SteinerJ. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med. 1996;(3)27:305-308.
19. DeanAG, SullivanKM, SoeMM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version. www.OpenEpi.com. Updated May 4, 2015. Accessed March 2, 2016.
20. JamiesonD. The treatment of Kenny Farnsworth. Washington Post Magazine. 2009 Nov 11 (Magazine W12).
21. International Association of Firefighters. Emergency Medical Services: Paramedic Expanded Scope. Monograph 6. Washington, DC USA: IAFF; 1997.
22. MandelbergJ, KuhnR, KohnM. Epidemiologic analysis of an urban, public emergency department’s frequent users. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(6):637-646.
23. SpillaneL, LumbE, CobaughD, WilcoxS, ClarkK, SchneiderS. Frequent users of the emergency department: can we intervene? Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4(6):574-580.
24. WeissS, ErnstA, OngM, et al. Effects of a social services intervention among 911 repeat users. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(4):492-496.
25. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. EMS Agenda for the Future. Washington, DC USA: NHTSA; 1996.
26. Joint Committee on Rural Emergency Care, National Association of State EMS Officials. Beyond 911: state and community strategies for expanding the primary care role of first responders. National Conference of State Legislatures. December 2010.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 125 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 588 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.