Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T05:04:20.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Interactive Videodisc to Test Advanced Airway Management Skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Arthur J. Rubens ,
Walt Stoy  and
Gina Piane
Arthur J. Rubens*
Affiliation:
Public Health Program, School of Allied Health Professions, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
Walt Stoy
Affiliation:
Director of Education, Research Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Center for Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Gina Piane
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Public Health Program, School of Allied Health Professions, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
*
Assistant Professor, Public Health Program, School of Allied Health Professions, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115-2854USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Actronics Interactive Learning System to teach the psychomotor skills of advanced airway management compared to the traditional method of lecture/demonstration.

Methods:

The study was a nonrandomized, nonequivalent comparison group design of a convenience sample of 86 American Heart Association (AHA), advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) students, who obtained instruction in airway management by the interactive videodisc (IVD) learning system (n = 41), or by the traditional method of demonstration/return demonstration (n = 45). The evaluation criteria for the students were based on the number of attempts required to perform successfully endotracheal (ET) intubation and esophageal obturator airway (EOA) insertion.

Results:

No statistically significant differences in the performance of ET insertion between the IVD and the traditional method of instruction could be demonstrated. However, initial certifiers for ACLS learning EOA insertion by the IVD method had a treatment effect (p = 0.004) compared to ACLS students learning by the traditional method. This treatment effect was not noted with ET intubation and EOA insertion for students seeking recertification. In a post-test satisfaction questionnaire, 34 IVD students reported satisfaction with learning airway management using this instructional method, but also expressed a preference to have an ACLS instructor available.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the role of IVD in teaching the complex skills of advanced airway management.

Keywords

advanced life support airway skillsinteractive videodisc (IVD) instructionIVD instruction of medical skillstesting advanced airway skills
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 251 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kastendick, J: Airway Management. In: Rosen, P, et al. (eds): Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice, Vol. 1: St.Louis: C.V. Mosby Company; 1983, pp 26–53.Google Scholar
2. Jorden, RC: Airway management: Airway management and anesthesia in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1988;6:671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Steward, RD: Endotracheal Intubation. Current Therapy in Emergency Medicine 1987; pp 11–21.Google Scholar
4. American Heart Association, Emergency Cardiac Care Committee: Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. JAMA 1974;227:833–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. American Heart Association: Instructor's Manual far Advanced Cardiac Life Support, 2nd ed. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Safer, P, Berkebile, P, Scott, MA, et al. : Education research on life-supporting first aid and CPR self-training systems. Crit Care Med 1981;9:403–404.Google Scholar
7. Smith, JR, Bodai, BI, Auburg, R, Ward, RE: A field evaluation of the esophageal obturator airway. J Trauma 1983;23:313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Shea, SR, MacDonald, JR, Gruzinski, G: Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal tube airway: A critical critique. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:102–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Iserson, KV, Sanders, AB, Kaback, K: Difficult intubations: Aids and alternatives. Am Fam Physician 1985;31:99–112.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Pons, P: Esophageal obturator airway. Airway management and anesthesia in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1988;6:693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. American Heart Association, Emergency Cardiac Care Committee: Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. JAMA 1986;255:2905–2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Dauphinee, K: Orotracheal intubation. Airway management and anesthesia in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1988;6:699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. MacLeod, BA, Seaberg, DC, Paris, PM: Prehospital therapy, past, present and future: EMS/prehospital care. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1990;8:313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Danzl, DF: Advanced Airway Support, In: Tintinalli, JE, Rothstein, RJ, Krome, RL (eds), Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. 1985:20–31.Google Scholar
15. Rice, P, Dubbe, R: Development of the first optical videodisc. SMPTE Journal 1982;91:277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Bork, A: Stand-alone computer systems—Our educational future. J Educational Technology Systems 1978–1979;7:201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Branson, RK, Foster, RW: Educational applications research and videodisc technology. J Educational Technology Systems 1979–1980;8:241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Gayeski, DM: Interactive video: Integrating design levels and hardware levels. J Educational Technology Systems 1984–1985;13:145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Rizzolo, MA: What's new in interactive video. Am J Nurs 1989;89:407–408.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Ullmer, EJ: Videodisc Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine January 1989;9–16.Google Scholar
21. Clark, J: How do interactive videodiscs rate against other media. Instructional Innovator 1984;29:12–16.Google Scholar
22. Hines, SJ: Future horizons. Instructional Innovator 1983;28:10–11.Google Scholar
23. Simcoe, DD: Interactive video today. Instructional Innovator 1983;28:12–13.Google Scholar
24. Locatis, CN: Videodisc Repurposing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine January 1989;9–30.Google Scholar
25. Hon, D: Interactive training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BYTE 1982;7:1–14.Google Scholar
26. Lyness, AL: Effectiveness of interactive video to teach CPR theory and skills; Paper presented to the Research and Theory Division of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, California; 1985.Google Scholar
27. Rubens, A: Testing airway management skills: Interactive video courseware vs ACLS instructor. Respiratory Care 1991;36:849–856.Google ScholarPubMed
28. Auckerman, ME: Effectiveness of an interactive video approach for CPR recertification of registered nurses. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1986.Google Scholar
29. Molnar, AR: Intelligent videodisc and the learning society. J Educational Technology Systems 1979–1980;8:31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Curless, E, Coover-Stone, YJ: Simulating clinical situations: Interactive videodisc. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 1987;6:246–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Shehee, A: Computer certified CPR. Amer J Nurs 1989;59:548.Google Scholar
32. Hannafin, MJ: Empirical issues in the study of computer-assisted interactive video. Educational Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development 1985;33:235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar