Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T16:31:38.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

State Law Litigation of International Norms: Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zachary D. Clopton*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State Law Litigation of International Norms
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 3 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 1 (2013).

2 E.g., Ku, Julian G., Gubernatorial Foreign Policy, 115 Yale L.J. 2380 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ku, Julian G., The State of New York Does Exist: How the States Control Compliance with International Law, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 457 (2004)Google Scholar.

3 Crosby v. Nat’l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363 (2000).

4 Am. Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396 (2003).

5 Movsesian v. Versicherung AG, 670 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc), vacating 629 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2010).

6 Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc., 847 F. Supp. 61 (S.D. Tex. 1994).

7 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).

8 Spiro, Peter J., Globalization and the (Foreign Affairs) Constitution, 63 Ohio St. L.J. 649 (2002)Google Scholar.

9 Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008).

10 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012).

11 Zivotofsky ex rel. Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 132 S. Ct. 1421 (2012).