Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:21:17.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of Lactuca sativa and Urtica dioica on in vitro acidosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

K. E. Kliem*
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK.
R. Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK.
F. L. Mould
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK.
Get access

Extract

As part of “Rumen-Up”, an EU Framework 5 project, a total of 500 plants and plant extracts were screened in vitro for their effect on general rumen fermentation parameters, in particular their ability to influence microbial protein production, protozoal numbers, methane production, bloat and acidosis. Many of the plants investigated were found to have potentially beneficial effects with respect to ruminant production. The activities of 25 plants were patented, including two that The University of Reading identified as maintaining a significantly higher fermentation medium pH - common lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica) with the aim that these plants (or their derivatives) would be incorporated as feed supplements to reduce the incidence of rumen acidosis. The results reported here are from an in vitro dose titration study conducted to identify possible dietary inclusion levels prior to conducting a large-scale animal production study.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970) Forage Fibre Analysis. USDA Agriculture Handbook, Washington DC:US Department of Agriculture, No. 379, pp20.Google Scholar