Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:21:14.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of abattoir, carcass suspension method, ageing time and anatomical position of the measurement on visual and near infrared spectrum characteristics of the longissimus dorsi of lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

O Oltra*
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute of Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
L Farmer
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute of Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
B W Moss
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute of Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
J Birnie
Affiliation:
Dunbia, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Visual and near infrared reflectance (VisNIR) has been identified as a possible on-line method that could discriminate some eating quality attributes of lamb (Andres et al. 2007). However, the accuracy and repeatability of this method for predicting eating quality depends on the development of an optimal sampling protocol (Shackelford et al., 2004) and of an optimal formula for the prediction model. The aims of this experiment were to identify if factors such as abattoir, carcass suspension method, ageing time and anatomical position along the Longissimus dorsi muscle can affect the characteristic of the VisNIR spectra. The information obtained from this study will allow the development an optimal protocol and prediction model.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrés, S., Murray, I., Navajas, E.A., Fisher, A.V., Lambe, N.R., Bünger, L. 2007. Meat Science. 76, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, S.D., Wheeler, T.L., Koohmaraie, M. 2004. Meat Science. 68, 371–381.Google Scholar