Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:42:44.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic correlations between the cross country, dressage and showjumping phases of eventing competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

C. G. S. Kearsley*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J .A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Competition data is widely used in the genetic evaluation of racing (Belhajyahia et al., 2003) and showjumping horses (Reilly et al., 1998). However, its use in the evaluation of eventing horses is rare. In a previous study, we investigated the use of competition results for the evaluation of eventing horses by examining the component parts of eventing competition – dressage, showjumping and cross country (Kearsley, unpublished). The aim of this study is to estimate genetic correlations between the different phases of eventing competition at pre novice and novice level as part of a project to predict breeding values for British sport horses.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belhajyahia, T., Blouin, C., Langlois, B. & Harzalla, H., 2003. Anim. Res. 52, 481–488.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J., & Thompsom, R., 2002. VSN International Ltd., UKGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, H. A., & van der Meij, G. J. W. 1989. Livest. Prod. Sci. 21, 333–345.Google Scholar
Reilly, M., Foran, M.K., Kelleher, D.L., Flanagan, M.J. & Brophy, P.O., 1998. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 115, 17–25.Google Scholar
Royston, J. P., 1982. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C-Appl. Stat 31, 161–165.Google Scholar