Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T08:07:14.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGN THINKING TO ENHANCE REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

Part of: Systems Engineering and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Batista ,
A. Hassan  and
E. Bonjour
J. Batista
Affiliation:
Universidade Regional do Cariri, Brazil
A. Hassan*
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine, France
E. Bonjour
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine, France
*
*alaa.hassan@univ-lorraine.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Systems engineering (SE) is a general methodological approach that includes all relevant activities to design, develop and verify a system. This work was based on the need to enhance the integration of the customer needs into the design phases of SE. A joint methodology was proposed integrating the SE approach with the Design Thinking (DT). An analysis was conducted as part of a case study proposed by IBM Corporation for the development of a security system for a building. The results confirm that the insertion of the DT in the SE has a significant impact on the generation of concept solutions.

Keywords

systems engineering (SE)design thinkingcustomer integration methodsdesign process
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2255 - 2264
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Boly, V. et al. (2016), “From descriptive customer data to need definition: a formalised approach”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 21 No. 5/6, p. 369. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpd.2016.10004476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesar, J. and Russo, R.D.F.S.M. (2018), “Design Thinking Integrated in Agile Software Development : A Systematic Literature Review”, Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 00 No. 138, pp. 775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erzurumlu, S.S. and Erzurumlu, Y.O. (2015), “Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis”, Resources Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 46, pp. 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faisandier, A. (2013), Systems opportunities and requirements, Sinergy'Com, France.Google Scholar
Faisandier, A. (2014a), “Ingénierie des besoins et des exigences d'un système complexe,” Innovation | Management et ingénierie de l'innovation, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Faisandier, A. (2014b), Notions de Système et d'ingénierie de système, 1st ed, Synergi'Com, France.Google Scholar
Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N.M.P. and Jan, E. (2016) “Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process - A workshop based on a value mapping process,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 43, pp. 1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, H.-P. (2011) Systems Engineering Best Practices with the Rational Solution for Systems and Software Engineering Deskbook, 2nd ed. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2009.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO (2015), Systems and software engineering — System life cycle processes, 1st ed. Edited by I. I. 15288. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288Google Scholar
Lim, C. et al. (2019) “Multi-factor service design: identification and consideration of multiple factors of the service in its design process,” Service Business, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-018-0363-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, F. and Hillen, V. (2016), Le Design Thinking par la pratique: De la rencontre avec l'utilisateur à la commercialisation d'un produit innovant pour les seniors, Eyrolles, Eyrolles, Paris.Google Scholar
Mosely, G., Wright, N. and Wrigley, C. (2018) “Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, Elsevier, Vol. 27 No. January, pp. 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paula, D. and Cormican, K. (2016) “Understanding Design Thinking in Design Studies (2006-2015): A Systematic Mapping Study,” In 14th International Design Conference, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Péché, J.-P., Mieyeville, F. and Gaultier, R. (2016) “Design thinking: le design en tant que management de projet,” Entreprendre & Innover, Vol. 28 No. 1, p. 83. https://doi.org/10.3917/entin.028.0083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, P. (2018) “From Design Thinking to Art Thinking with an Open Innovation Perspective — From Design Thinking to Art Thinking with an Open Innovation Perspective — A Case Study of How Art Thinking Rescued a Cultural Institution in Dublin,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 57 No. April 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4040057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roby, T. (2006), Maîtrise d'Ouvrage - Maîtrise d'Oeuvre: Dans le projets de mise en oeuvre de Systèmes d'Information.Google Scholar
Tschimmel, K. (2012) “Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation,” In The XXIII ISPIM Conference, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar