Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-22T12:02:51.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT FOR EVALUATING SEATING POSITIONS IN PARALYMPIC ROWING

Part of: Engineering Design Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. W. Eikevåg ,
A. Kvam ,
M. K. Bjølseth ,
J. F. Erichsen  and
M. Steinert
S. W. Eikevåg*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
A. Kvam
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
M. K. Bjølseth
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
J. F. Erichsen
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
M. Steinert
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
*
*sindrwe@stud.ntnu.no

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When designing high performance sports equipment for Paralympic athletes, there are many unknowns for the design engineer to consider. The design challenge is an optimisation task per individual athlete. However, modelling this optimisation is difficult due to the many variables. This article presents the design of an experiment for identifying and evaluating various seating positions in Paralympic rowing by using a rowing ergometer with a modified seat. Results indicate that changing seating position has a substantial impact on per-athlete rowing performance.

Keywords

paralympic rowingprototypingdesign evaluationsports engineeringoptimisation

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2485 - 2494
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Arts, F.J.P. and Kuipers, H. (1994), “The Relation Between Power Output, Oxygen Uptake and Heart Rate in Male Athletes”, International Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 228–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgart, J.K. et al. (2018), “Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 118 No. 9, pp. 1857–1867.10.1007/s00421-018-3912-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyas, S. et al. (2006), “Power Responses of a Rowing Ergometer: Mechanical Sensors vs. Concept2® Measurement System”, International Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 830–833.10.1055/s-2006-923774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caminal, P. et al. (2018), “Validity of the Polar V800 monitor for measuring heart rate variability in mountain running route conditions”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 118 No. 3, pp. 669–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J.A. et al. (1976), “Anaerobic threshold and maximal aerobic power for three modes of exercise”, Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 544–550.10.1152/jappl.1976.41.4.544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grazzi, G. et al. (1999), “The power output/heart rate relationship in cycling: test standardization and repeatability”, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 31 No. 10, pp. 1478–1483.10.1097/00005768-199910000-00019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, M.B., Elverum, C.W. and Steinert, M. (2017), “Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures | Elsevier Enhanced Reader”, March, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeukendrup, A. and Diemen, A.V. (1998), “Heart rate monitoring during training and competition in cyclists”, Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 16 No. sup1, pp. 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C.M. and Gorelick, M. (2011), “Validity of the Smarthealth Watch to Measure Heart Rate During Rest and Exercise”, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 18–25.10.1080/1091367X.2011.539089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E. and Tenenberg, J. (2008), “The Anatomy of Prototypes: Prototypes As Filters, Prototypes As Manifestations of Design Ideas”, ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 7:1–7:27.10.1145/1375761.1375762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucía, A. et al. (2000), “Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study”, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 1777–1782.Google ScholarPubMed
Mâsse, L.C., Lamontagne, M. and O'riain, M.D. (1992), “Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 12–28.10.1682/JRRD.1992.07.0012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messonnier, L.A. et al. (2013), “Lactate kinetics at the lactate threshold in trained and untrained men”, Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 114 No. 11, pp. 1593–1602.10.1152/japplphysiol.00043.2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, W. et al. (2016), “Role of muscle activation in the sit-skiing performance and classification process”, p. 11.Google Scholar
Shan, G. (2008), “Sport Equipment Evaluation and Optimization – A Review of the Relationship between Sport Science Research and Engineering”, https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x00801010005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, R.K., Fuller, K.L. and Ross, M.L.R. (2010), “Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 109 No. 3, pp. 551–559.10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Too, D. (1991), “The Effect of Hip Position/Configuration on Anaerobic Power and Capacity in Cycling”, https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsb.7.4.359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winjum, J. et al. (2017), “A Heuristic Approach for Early-Stage Product Development in Extreme Environments”, Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation 2017, IEEE, Madeira.10.1109/ICE.2017.8279942CrossRefGoogle Scholar