Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T13:16:05.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGNING FOR SCIENCE CENTER EXHIBITIONS – A CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR THE INTERACTION

Part of: Industrial Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Wideström
J. Wideström*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
*
*josef.widestrom@chalmers.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While designing and discussing exhibitions in science centers, common conceptual framework is needed. This paper provides a framework based on participation, virtuality, and collaboration, and two models - a Rubik's cube model and a Scatter plot space. They are suitable tools for analysis and overview of existing and planned exhibitions, as well as for conceptual analysis during the design process. The classification and the models for the interaction have been developed in a research by design process, where 45 prototypes have been designed, exhibited and tested.

Keywords

design for x (DfX)design toolsinteraction designvirtual spacescience centers

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1657 - 1666
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Cuendet, S. et al. (2013), “Designing augmented reality for the classroom”, Computers & Education, Vol. 68, pp. 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourish, P. (2004), “What we talk about when we talk about context”, Personal and Ubiqut. Computing, Vol. 8, pp. 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, E. (2011), “Spatial Explorations in Interaction Design”, Proceedings of Ambience’11 Conference.Google Scholar
Eriksson, E. and Wideström, J. (2014), “Staging the Interaction – Explorative Interventions for Engaging Citizens in the Development of Public Knowledge Institutions”, Proceedings of Design Research Society's Conference.Google Scholar
Eriksson, E. and Wideström, J. (2015), “The Virtual Culture House – Shaping the Identity of a Public Knowledge Institution”, Proceedings of The Value of Design Research Conference. Paris.Google Scholar
IDXPO (2019), Project website. [online] http://idxpo.se/Google Scholar
Karlén, J. (2017), “Learning with Digital Tools on Public Knowledge Institutions, A Literature Review based on Grounded Theory”, Göteborg University. Report, Vol. 2017 No. 106, pp. 36.Google Scholar
Koran, J., Longino, S. and Shafer, L. (1983), “A framework for conceptualizing research in natural history museums and science centers”, JRST, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 325–339.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Zhang, Q. (2019), “Interface Design Aesthetics of Interaction Design”. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and Theory.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. (2004), Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing, MIT Press Cambridge, MA. USA.Google Scholar
Ocampo-Agudelo, J., Maya, J. and Roldán, A. (2017), “A Tool for the Design of Experience-Centered Exhibits in Science Centers”, Science World Summit.Google Scholar
Rennie, L. and McClafferty, T. (1995), “Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science”, J Sci Teacher Educ, Vol. 6, pp. 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, E.B.-N. (2005), “Information, inspiration and co-creation”. The 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. Bremen, Germany.Google Scholar
Simeone, A.L., Velloso, E., and Gellersen, H. (2015), “Substitutional Reality: Using the Physical Environment to Design Virtual Reality Experiences”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, N. (2010), The Participatory Museum. [online] http://www.participatorymuseum.orgGoogle Scholar
Stappers, P.J. (2007), “Doing design as a part of doing research”. In: Michel, R. (Ed.), Design research now: essays and selected projects. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Universeum (2015), Versamhetsberättelse. Report 2015.Google Scholar
Ware, C. (2000), Information Visualization: Perception for design, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Wideström, J. (2019), “The Transdisciplinary Nature of Virtual Space”, Book chapter in Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics. AVR 2019, LNCS 11613, Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp. 186–202.Google Scholar