Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-gz6rp Total loading time: 0.236 Render date: 2022-11-27T12:22:51.209Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

DEVELOPMENT OF A POTENTIAL MODEL TO SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT AND INTRODUCTION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

D. Schneider*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
T. Huth
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
T. Vietor
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
P. Schumacher
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
C. Weckenborg
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
T. Spengler
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As digitalisation progresses, the demands placed on companies are increasing at all stages of the product generation process. In order to address these requirements and maintain economic strength, companies must implement innovative and intelligent technologies. Small and medium-sized enterprises in particular are confronted with various obstacles, the overcoming of which is addressed by the “Potential Model” presented in this publication.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abele, E. and Reinhart, G. (2011), Zukunft der Produktion: Herausforderungen, Forschungsfelder, Chancen, Carl Hanser Fachbuchverlag, s.l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, M.-K. (2013), Supply chain performance measurement: Operative und strategische Management- und Controllingansätze, 3rd ed., EUL Verlag, Köln.Google Scholar
Faller, C. and Feldmüller, D. (2015), “Industry 4.0 Learning Factory for regional SMEs”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 32, pp. 8891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J. et al. (2017), Mit Industrie 4.0 zum Unternehmenserfolg - Integrative Planung von Geschäftsmodellen und Wertschöpfungssystemen, Heinz Nixdorf Institut, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Jong, T.D. and Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1996), “Types and qualities of knowledge”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagermann, H. et al. (2016), Industrie 4.0 in a Global Context: Strategies for Cooperating with International Partners (acatech STUDY), Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), “Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy”, California Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 5379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, V. et al. (2014), Industrie 4.0 - Chancen und Herausforderungen der vierten industriellen Revolution, Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Lanza, G. et al. (2016), “Befähigungs- und Einführungsstrategien für Industrie 4.0”, ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 111 No. 1-2, pp. 7679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. and Seo, K.-K. (2016), “A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for a Cloud Service Selection Problem Using BSC, Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP”, Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lembeck, H. et al. (2019), Evaluation methodology for the process integration of industry 4.0 solutions into Design, Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lu, M.-T. et al. (2018), “A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports”, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 71, pp. 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey, . (2016), “Industry 4.0 at McKinsey's model factories”, available at: http://sf-eu.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/mckinsey-2016-industry-4.0-at-mckinseys-model-factories-en.pdf (accessed 14 November 2019).Google Scholar
Nowack, M.L. (1997), Design guideline support for manufacturability, Selwyn College, Cambride.Google Scholar
Rauch, E., Dallasega, P. and Matt, D.T. (2016), “The Way from Lean Product Development (LPD) to Smart Product Development (SPD)”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, A.C. and Romero, F. (2017), “A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 13, pp. 12061214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reik, M.P. et al. (2006), “Design for Changeover (DFC)”, In: Blecker, T. and Friedrich, G. (Eds.), Mass Customization: Challenges and Solutions, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 87, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 111136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudtsch, V. (2016), Methodik zur Bewertung von Produktionssystemen in der frühen Entwicklungsphase, Dissertation, Dissertation, Universität Paderborn, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Şahin, T. et al. (2018), “How to Foster Innovation? Findings and Hypotheses for Collaborations between Research and Industry”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 19451956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. et al. (2017), Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies (acatech STUDY), Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich.Google Scholar
Terstegen, S. et al. (2019), “Vergleichsstudie über Vorgehensmodelle zur Einführung und Umsetzung von Digitalisierungs- maßnahmen in der produzierenden Industrie”, In: GfA, (Ed.), Frühjahrskongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaften - Arbeit interdisziplinär analysieren – bewerten – gestalten, Vol. 65, Dortmund.Google Scholar
Thielsch, M.T., Lenzner, T. and Melles, T. (2012), “Wie gestalte ich gute Items und Interviewfragen?”, In: Praxis der Wirtschaftspsychologie: Themen und Fallbeispiele für Studium und Anwendung, Vol. 2, Monsenstein u. Vannerdat, Münster, pp. 221240.Google Scholar
VDMA - Forum Industrie 4.0 (2019), Guideline Industrie 4.0 - Guiding principles for the implementation ofIndustrie 4.0 in small and medium sized businesses, VDMA Verlag GmbH, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Wichmann, R.L., Eisenbart, B. and Gericke, K. (2019), “The Direction of Industry: A Literature Review on Industry 4.0”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 21292138.Google Scholar
You have Access Open access
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

DEVELOPMENT OF A POTENTIAL MODEL TO SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT AND INTRODUCTION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

DEVELOPMENT OF A POTENTIAL MODEL TO SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT AND INTRODUCTION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

DEVELOPMENT OF A POTENTIAL MODEL TO SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT AND INTRODUCTION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *