Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-27T21:30:15.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INCONSISTENCY MANAGEMENT FOR PRODUCT FAMILIES WITH MANY VARIANTS THROUGH A MODEL-BASED APPROACH IN MODULAR LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

M. Hanna ,
J. Schwenke  and
D. Krause
M. Hanna*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
J. Schwenke
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
D. Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
*
*michael.hanna@tuhh.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In methodical product development, numerous data are used and linked with each other, especially variant-related data. This paper presents a model-based solution for avoiding inconsistencies in the development of product families with many variants and extends it to modular lightweight design. In addition, the inconsistencies in methodical product development were classified and solution approaches were shown. Thus, inconsistencies can be avoided with the presented elaborated data model for an integrated product and process model based on the presented procedure.

Keywords

modularisationlightweight designsystems engineering (SE)modellingconsistency management

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 917 - 926
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A. et al. (2019), “Model-based systems engineering in modular design”, Design Science Journal, Published by Cambridge University Press 2019.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Wintergerst, E., (2015), “Product generation development - importance and challenges from a design research perspective”. In: Proceedings of INASE Conferences 2015, INASE, Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “Advanced Systems Engineering – Towards A Model-Based and Human-Centered Methodology”. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (TMCE), Karlsruhe, 2012.Google Scholar
Bahns, T. et al. (2015), “Sustainability of Modular Product Families”, 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED15, Mailand.Google Scholar
Basirati, M.R. et al. (2018), “Towards systematic inconsistency identification for product service systems”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 / 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, GlasgowCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavendiek, A., Inkermann, D. and Vietor, T., (2018), “Interrelations between processes, methdos, and tools in collaborative design - a framework”, 21. International Conference of engineering Design, ICED17, 2017 Vancouver.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, S. et al. (1994), “Coordinating Distributed ViewPoints: the anatomy of a consistency check”, September 1994 Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 209–222.10.1177/1063293X9400200307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C.M. et al. (2017), “On the integration of product and process models in engineering design”, Design Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erixon, G. (1998), “Modular function deployment: a method for product modularization”, Dissertation, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, A. et al. (1992), “Viewpoints: A Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspectives in System Development” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 31–58, March 1992, World Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Gräßler, I., Yang, X. (2019), “Entwicklung mechatronischer Systeme und Modulleichtbau: Anforderungen am Beispiel von Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)”, March 2019 http://doi.org/10.17619/UNIPB/1-774 Conference: Fachtagung Mechatronik 2019At: PaderbornCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, M., Schwede, L.-N. and Krause, D. (2018a), “Model-Based Consistency for Design for Variety and Modularization”, 20th International DSM Conference, DSM 2018, Trieste, Italy, 2018, S. 239-248.Google Scholar
Hanna, M., Schwenke, J. and Krause, D. (2018b), “Modularer Leichtbau – Chancen und Herausforderungen im digitalisierten Entwicklungsprozess” 30. DfX-Symposium, Hamburg 2019.10.35199/dfx2019.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzig, S. (2005), “A Bayesian Learning Approach to Inconsistency Identification in Model-Based Systems Engineering”, Dissertation.Google Scholar
Herzig, S. et al. (2011), “A Conceptual Framework for Consistency Management in Model-Based Systems Engineering”, In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE, 2011 August 29-31, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Holt, J., Perry, S. and Brownsword, M. (2012), “Model-based requirements engineering”, The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London.10.1049/PBPC009ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkermann, D. (2019), “Towards model-based process engineering”, International Conference of Engineering Design, ICED 19, Delft.10.1017/dsi.2019.381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D. et al. (2014), “Integrated Development of Modular Product Families: A Methods Toolkit”, In: Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J.R., Siddique, Z. and Hölttä-Otto, K., Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design, Springer, New York, pp. 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D. et al. (2017), “New Trends in the Design Methodology of Modularization”, 11th International Workshop on Integrated Design Engineering, IDE Workshop, 5-7. April 2017, Magdeburg.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U., Maurer, M. and Braun, T. (2009), “Structural complexity management: an approach for the field of product design”, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimmler, T. and Eppinger, S. (1994), “Integration analysis of product decompositions”, In: Proceedings of the 6th design theory and methodology conference, New York, pp. 343–351.10.1115/DETC1994-0034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quamar, A. and Paradeis, C., (2012), “Dependency Modelling And Modell management in Mechatronic Design”, Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2012, August 12-15, 2012, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Salvador, F. (2007), “Towards a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization”, In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2007, 54; S. 219–240.Google Scholar
Stachowiak, H. (1973), “Allgemeine Modelltheorie”, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Stone, R. B. (1997), “Towards a Theory of Modular Design”, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Weilkins, T. (2008), “Systems Engineering with SysML/UML: Modeling, Analysis, Design”, Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, J. (2007), “Leichtbau. Elemente und Konstruktion”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 3. Auflage, 2007.Google Scholar