Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T05:14:32.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF SCALE IN DESIGN SESSIONS SUPPORTED BY A SPATIAL AUGMENTED REALITY (SAR) TOOL

Part of: Design Support Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

L. Giunta ,
E. Dekoninck  and
J. Gopsill
L. Giunta*
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
E. Dekoninck
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
J. Gopsill
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
*
*lg413@bath.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spatial Augmented Reality (SAR) differs from other forms of AR by allowing the projection of digital images onto a model. This allows the AR to be more tangible and for interaction to be more realistic. The scale of the model plays a role in the realism but may be constrained by technical factors. This study attempts to understand the influence scale has on a design session by analysing the concept generation process, the ease of designing and the design behaviour. Understanding how these factors are influenced by the model scale betters the understanding of how SAR can influence design.

Keywords

spatial augmented realityscalecollaborative designco-designaugmented reality (AR)

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 131 - 140
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Becattini, N. et al. (2018), “Coding schemes for the analysis of ict supported co-creative design sessions”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, Design, Vol. 2, pp. 533–544. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, O. and Raskar, R. (2005), Spatial Augmented Reality Merging Real and Virtual Worlds, A K Peters, Wellesley.10.1201/b10624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, G. et al. (2016), Technologies and Techniques – State of the Art Updates, Milano.Google Scholar
Caruso, G., Carulli, M. and Bordegoni, M. (2015), “Augmented Reality System for the Visualization and Interaction with 3D Digital Models in a Wide Environment”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2014.949579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, E. and Latulipe, C. (2014), “Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 21 No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekoninck, E.A. et al. (2018), “Exploring ways to speed up the application of metrics to assess co-creative design sessions”, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Dey, A. et al. (2018), “A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies : 2005 to 2014”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol. 5 No. April. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988), “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research”, Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52 No. C, pp. 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khemlani, L. et al. (1997), “Semantically Rich Building Representation”, Design and Representation ACADIA ‘97 Conference Proceedings, pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
Morosi, F. et al. (2018), “Analysis of Co-Design Scenarios and Activities for the Development of a Spatial-Augmented Reality Design Platform”, in International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 381–392. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hare, J. et al. (2018), “Defining requirements for an Augmented Reality system to overcome the challenges of creating and using design representations in co-design sessions”, CoDesign. Taylor & Francis, Vol. 00 No. 00, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1546319Google Scholar
O'Hare, J.A. et al. (2018), “Exploring the Performance of Augmented Reality Technologies in Co- Creative Sessions : Initial Results from Controlled Experiments”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 405–416. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, S.K. et al. (2011), “Augmented Reality in Product Development and Manufacturing”, in Handbook of Augmented Reality. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp. 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, M.K. et al. (2015), “Spatial augmented reality for product appearance design evaluation”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. Elsevier, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2014.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, S.R. et al. (2010), “Validating spatial augmented reality for interactive rapid prototyping”, in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, IEEE, pp. 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643599Google Scholar