Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:59:41.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

METHOD FOR 3D-ENVIRONMENT DRIVEN DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION AND SYSTEM MODEL GENERATION

Part of: Design Support Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. Japs ,
L. Kaiser  and
A. Kharatyan
S. Japs*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
L. Kaiser
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
A. Kharatyan
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
*
*sergej.japs@iem.fraunhofer.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The development of cyber-physical systems requires close cooperation between stakeholders from different disciplines. Model-based systems engineering support this by the design of a system model. Non-identified domain knowledge by the stakeholders is a challenge when creating the system model. The CONSENS 3D-Modeling Method supports the domain-independent elicitation of domain knowledge using a 3D environment and enables the derivation of a SysML system model. We applyed the method by implementing a prototype, called 3D Engineer, to an application example from the automotive industry.

Keywords

3D modellingvirtual engineering (VE)model-based engineeringcyber-physical systemssystems modeling language
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 197 - 206
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abad, Z.S.H. et al. (2018), “ELICA: An Automated Tool for Dynamic Extraction of Requirements Relevant Information”, Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE), Banff, AB, pp. 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIRE.2018.00007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alessio, F., Gnesi, S. and Spoletini, P. (2016), “Ambiguity and tacit knowledge in requirements elicitation interviews”, Requirements Engineering, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0249-3Google Scholar
Asger, M. and Yousuf, M. (2015), “Comparison of Various Requirements Elicitation Techniques”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 116 No. 4, pp. 8–15. https://doi.org/10.5120/20322-2408Google Scholar
Atukorala, N.L. and Chang, C.K., (2018), Situation-Oriented Software Requirements Specification and Model Generation, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Bhimani, A. and Spolentini, P. (2017), “Empowering Requirements Elicitation for Populations with Special Needs by Using Virtual Reality”, ACM SE ‘17 Proceedings of the SouthEast Conference, Kennesaw, GA, USA, April 13-15, 2017, ACM, New York, pp. 268–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077286.3078467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhimani, A. (2017), Feasibility of Using Virtual Reality in Requirements Elicitation Process, [Master Thesis], Kennesaw State University.Google Scholar
Brenner, W. and Uebernickel, F. (2016), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice, 1st ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. et al. (2015), “Virtual Business Role-Play: Leveraging Familiar Environments to Prime Stakeholder Memory During Process Elicitation”, 27th International Conference, CAiSE 2015, Stockholm, Sweden, June 8-12, 2015, Springer International Publishing, pp. 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Harman, J. and Johnson, D. (2017), “Improved Memory Elicitation in Virtual Reality: New Experimental Results and Insights”, 16th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Mumbai, India, September 25-29, 2017, Springer International Publishing, pp. 128–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989), “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning”, Sage Journals, Vol. 18 No. 1, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032Google Scholar
Coulin, C. and Zowghi, D. (2005), “Requirements Elicitation: A Survey of Techniques, Approaches, and Tools”, Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_2Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, R. et al. (2013), “Automatic Verification of Modeling Rules in Systems Engineering for Mechatronic Systems”, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, August 4-7, 2013, ASME, New York, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12330Google Scholar
Dori, D. (2016), Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3295-5Google Scholar
Florides, C. et al. (2015), “Driving simulator for discovering requirements in complex systems”, SummerSim ‘15 Proceedings of the Conference on Summer Computer Simulation, Illinois, Chicago, July 26-29, 2015, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Ramming, F.J. and Schäfer, W. (2014), Design Methodology for Intelligent Technical Systems: Develop Intelligent Technical Systems of the Future, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45435-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japs, S. (2020), Prototypical implementation of 3D Engineer, [online] Japs, S. Available at: https://gitlab.cc-asp.fraunhofer.de/mbseguy/3d_engineer (accessed 10.02.2020).Google Scholar
Lewrick, M., Patrick, L. and Leifer, L. (2018), The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
No Magic (2019), Cameo Systems Modeler, [online] No Magic. Available at: https://www.nomagic.com/products/cameo-systems-modeler (accessed 02.11.2019).Google Scholar
OMG (2015), System Modeling Language V.1.4, OMG, Object Management Group, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Smart Mechatronics (2020), CONSENS, [online] Smart Mechatronics. Available at: https://smartmechatronics.de/consens (accessed 30.01.2020).Google Scholar
Tekaat, J. et al. (2019), “Potentials for the Integration of Design Thinking along Automotive Systems Engineering Focusing Security and Safety”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomita, Y. et al. (2017), “Applying design thinking in systems engineering process as an extended version of DIKW model”, Proceedings of the 27th Annual INCOSE International Symposium (IS 2017), Adelaide, Australia, July 15-20, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNITY Innovation Alliance (2020), Project References of the UNITY Innovation Alliance, [online] UNITY Innovation Alliance, available at: https://www.unity-innovation-alliance.com/en/ (accessed 30.01.2020).Google Scholar
Unity Technologies (2019a), Unity Asset Store, [online] Unity Technologies. Available at: https://assetstore.unity.com (accessed 02.11.2019).Google Scholar
Unity Technologies (2019b), Unity Game Engine, [online] Unity Technologies. Available at: https://unity.com (accessed 02.11.2019).Google Scholar