Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:48:49.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

YOU NEED TO FOCUS TO VALIDATE

Part of: Design Theory and Research Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

O. Isaksson ,
C. Eckert ,
M. Panarotto  and
J. Malmqvist
O. Isaksson*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
C. Eckert
Affiliation:
The Open University, United Kingdom
M. Panarotto
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
J. Malmqvist
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
*
*ola.isaksson@chalmers.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many research students find challenges when validating their research. Especially when they have expectations to contribute to both practice and the research body of knowledge. This paper argues that a key to successful validation of design research lies in the ability to focus on what to validate in advance of how to validate. The paper provide a set of guidelines to support a discussion on how to converge to a claim that actually can be validated. The paper reports on experiences from PhD level course on validation in design research.

Keywords

design researchevaluationresearch methodologies and methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 31 - 40
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

AIAA (1998), Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA G-077-1998.Google Scholar
Asimov, M. (1962), Introduction to Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.Google Scholar
Barth, A., Caillaud, E. and Rose, B. (2011), “How to validate research in engineering design?”, In DS 68-2: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11).Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer, London, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buur, J. (1990), A Theoretical Approach to Mechatronics Design, [Ph.D. Thesis], Institute for Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
Cantamessa, M. (2003), “An Empirical Perspective Upon Design Research”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482031000078126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J. and Stacey, M.K. (2003), “The Spiral of Applied Research: A Methodological View on Integrated Design Research”, ICED03: 14th International Conference on Engineering Design.Google Scholar
Frey, D.D. and Dym, C.L. (2006), “Validation of design methods: lessons from medicine”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-006-0016-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.Google Scholar
ISO (2015), “ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary”, Accessible via https://www.iso.org/Google Scholar
Le Dain, M.A., Blanco, E. and Summers, J.D. (2013), “Assessing design research quality: investigating verification and validation criteria”, In DS 75-2: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13).Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (2003, May), “Writing good software engineering research papers”, In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 726–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, C. (2002), Real world research, Second Edition, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. et al. (2000), “Validating design methods and research: the validation square”, DETC2000/DTM14579. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Baltimore, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.802469.ch25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, R.G. (2013), “Verification and validation of simulation models”, Journal of Simulation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seepersad, C.C. et al. (2006), “The Validation Square: How does one verify and validate design methods?”, In: Chen, W. et al. (Eds.) Decision Making in Engineering Design, ASME Press, New York, pp. 303–314.Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2014), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.Google Scholar