Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-25T03:02:45.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysing Paradigms for Managing Product Development: Conventional, Agile and Hybrid Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

L. Rößler  and
K. Gericke
L. Rößler*
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
K. Gericke
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
*
lisa.roessler@uni-rostock.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As the complexity of products and their development processes increases, a trend emerged where companies try to manage the complexity through implementing agile practices on all or on some levels of the development process. It is not yet clear if an agile approach is the solution or under which circumstances it can be most effective in the development of physical products. This paper aims to compile the information from existing empirical and meta-studies to give an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of conventional, agile and hybrid paradigms.

Keywords

project managementconventional product developmentagile developmentagile managementhybrid product development

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 263 - 272
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Müller, J. and Spadinger, M. (2019a), “Agility and its Features in Mechatronic System Development: A Systematic Literature Review”, ISPIM Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Spadinger, M., Reiss, N., Breitschuh, J., Richter, T., Bursac, N., et al. . (2019b), “A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, available at:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, M.M. and Hein, L. (2000), “Integrated Product Development”, Lyngby: Institute for Product Development, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
Ayhan, E. and Petra, B.S. (2011), “Information behavior in multidisciplinary design teams”, ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
Beck, K. (2000), Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1999., XP Series.Google Scholar
Becker, B. (2006), “Re-Thinking the Stage-Gate Process - A Reply to the Critics”, Management Roundtable.Google Scholar
Blessing, L. (1995), Comparison of Design Models Proposed in Prescriptive Literature, The Role of Design in the Shaping of Technology.Google Scholar
Boehm, B. (2002), “Notes for Systems Development Paradigms Get Ready for Agile Methods , with Care”, Ieee, No. Jan.Google Scholar
Boehm, B.W. and Turner, R. (2003), “Using Risk to Balance Driven Methods”, PoLAR, Vol. 36 No. June.Google Scholar
Browning, T.R. (2009), “The many views of a process: Toward a process architecture framework for product development processes”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, J. (2009), “a Hybrid Software Development Method for Large-Scale Projects: Rational Unified Process With Scrum”, Issues In Information Systems, pp. 340–348.Google Scholar
Collyer, S., Warren, C., Hemsley, B. and Stevens, C. (2010), “Aim, fire, aim - Project planning styles in dynamic environments”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 41, available at:10.1002/pmj.20199.Google Scholar
Conboy, K. (2009), “Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 20 No. 3, available at:10.1287/isre.1090.0236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conforto, E.C. and Amaral, D.C. (2016), “Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, Vol. 40, available at:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.02.003.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (1990), “Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products”, Business Horizons, Elsevier, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2014), “What's next? After stage-gate”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 57 No. 1, available at:10.5437/08956308X5606963.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2016), “Agile-stage-gate hybrids”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 59 No. 1, available at:10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Sommer, A.F. (2016a), “Agile-Stage-Gate: New idea-to-launch method for manufactured new products is faster, more responsive”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 59, available at:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Sommer, A.F. (2016b), “The Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 33 No. 5, available at:10.1111/jpim.12314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Sommer, A.F. (2018), “Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers: Changing the Way New Products Are DevelopedIntegrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 61 No. 2, available at:10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybå, T. and Dingsøyr, T. (2008), “Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review”, Information and Software Technology, available at: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006.Google Scholar
Edwards, K., Cooper, R.G., Vedsmand, T. and Nardelli, G. (2019), “Evaluating the agile-stage-gate hybrid model: Experiences from three SME manufacturing firms”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 16 No. 8, available at:10.1142/S0219877019500482.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2011), “A framework for comparing design modelling approaches across disciplines”, ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Fruhling, A. and De Vreede, G.J. (2006), “Field experiences with eXtreme Programming: Developing an emergency response system”, Journal of Management Information Systems, available at: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220403.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J. and Möhringer, S. (2003), “Die neue Richtlinie VDI2206: Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme”, VDI Berichte, No. 1753.Google Scholar
Gericke, K. and Bender, B. (2021), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre, Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre, available at: 10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7.Google Scholar
Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2011), “Comparisons of design methodologies and process models across disciplines: A literature review”, ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, T. (2016), “Benefits of agile project management in a non-software development context - A literature review”, Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives: Fifth International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Contries April 14-15, Riga, University of Latvia, No. April.Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Niever, M., Zimmermann, V., Klippert, M., Marthaler, F. and Albers, A. (2019), “Comparison of existing agile approaches in the context of mechatronic system development: Potentials and limits in implementation”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 2019-August, available at:10.1017/dsi.2019.226.Google Scholar
Jetter, A., Albar, F. and Sperry, R. (2016), “The practice of project management in product development: Insights from the literature and cases in high-tech”, The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects.Google Scholar
Leffingwell, D. (2011), Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise, Networks.Google Scholar
Macmillan, S., Steele, J., Kirby, P., Spence, R. and Austin, S. (2002), “Mapping the design process during the conceptual phase of building projects”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, available at: 10.1108/eb021213.Google Scholar
Miller, K.W. and Larson, D.K. (2005), “Agile software development: Human values and culture”, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Vol. 24 No. 4, available at:10.1109/MTAS.2005.1563500.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. and Sommer, A.F. (2015), “Scrum in the Traditional Development Organization: Adapting to the Legacy”, Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes, pp. 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, A., Smith, R., Hale, D. and Hale, J. (2004), “A field study of developer pairs: Productivity impacts and implications”, IEEE Software, Vol. 21 No. 5, available at:10.1109/MS.2004.1331306.Google Scholar
Rigby, D.K., Sutherland, J. and Takeuchi, H. (2016), “Embracing agile”, Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Roozenburg, N.F.M. and Cross, N.G. (1991), “Models of the design process: integrating across the disciplines”, Design Studies, Vol. 12 No. 4, available at:10.1016/0142-694X(91)90034-T.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., Atzberger, A., Gerling, C., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2019), Agile Development of Physical Products - An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Dölle, C., Kantelberg, J. and Menges, A. (2018), “Identification of Agile Mechanisms of Action As Basis for Agile Product Development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, available at:10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.007.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Beedle, M. (2001), Agile Software Development with Scrum, Cdswebcernch.Google Scholar
Serrador, P. and Pinto, J.K. (2015), “Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33 No. 5, available at:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, R. and Iqbal, Z. (2008), “Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 72 No. 1, available at:10.1509/jmkg.72.1.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, A.F. (2019), “Agile Transformation at LEGO Group”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 62 No. 5, available at:10.1080/08956308.2019.1638486.Google Scholar
Group, Standish. (1994), The Chaos Report, available at: https://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research_files/chaos_report_1994.pdf.Google Scholar
VDI2206. (2006), Design Methodology for Mechatronic Systems (VDI2206).Google Scholar
VDI2221. (2019), Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products (VDI2221).Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 2, available at:10.1007/s00163-017-0262-7.Google Scholar
Zasa, F.P., Patrucco, A. and Pellizzoni, E. (2020), “Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist?”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 64 No. 1, available at:10.1080/08956308.2021.1843331.Google Scholar