No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Challenges in design methods: perspectives of design students
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The aim of this study is to identify: (a) challenges in understanding and using design methods, and (b) features expected in an enhanced repository of design methods, by design students. These are identified through interviews and a survey. The major findings are (a) less (time for) practice leads to weak understanding and challenges in using design methods and (b) students expect to have a method recommendation system based on problem context. The findings from this study will guide in developing a user-centric, enhanced repository of design methods to aid design practice and pedagogy.
- Type
- Design Education
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Acharya, S., Chatty, T., Ranjan, B.S.C., Ghadge, K., Bharath, P.A. and Chakrabarti, A. (2018), “InDeaTe 3.0: an ontology based, generic design process guidance web-tool”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, Vol. 15, pp. 137–148, https://dx.doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becerril, L., Guertler, M. and Longa, E. (2019), “Developing design methods - A conceptual requirement framework”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 2019-Augus No. AUGUST, pp. 1463–1472, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Bella and Hanington, Bruce. (2012), Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar
Birkhöfer, H., Kloberdanz, H., Berger, B. and Sauer, T. (2002), “Why Methods Don't Work and How To Get Them Work.”, Engineering Design in Integrated Product Development, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (1993), “A History of Design Methodology”, Design Methodology and Relationships with Science, No. 1979, pp. 15–27, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8220-9_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalhuizen, J., Person, O. and Gattol, V. (2014), “A personal matter? An investigation of students’ design process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 133–159, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann, M. and Matthiesen, S. (2020), “Identifying reasons for a lack of method application in engineering design practice - an interview study”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 2495–2504, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.261.Google Scholar
Fuge, M., Peters, B. and Agogino, A. (2014), “Machine learning algorithms for recommending design methods”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 136 No. 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4028102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, C., Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2008), “Methods in practice - A study on requirements for development and transfer of design methods”, Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference, No. 1997, pp. 369–376.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C. and Stacey, M. (2022), “Elements of a design method - a basis for describing and evaluating design methods”, Design Science, Vol. 8, pp. 1–28, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Kramer, J. and Roschuni, C. (2016), “An exploratory study of the discovery and selection of design methods in practice”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Vol. 138 No. 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4034088.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2014), “What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 29–53, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guertler, M.R. (2018), “How to design methods for application - Empirical insights from industry”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 3, pp. 1161–1172, https://dx.doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0169.Google Scholar
Hjartarson, B., Daalhuizen, J. and Gustafsson, K.F. (2021), “the Dark Side of Methods – an Exploration of the Negative Effects of Method Use and Method Reflection in Design”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1 No. August, pp. 3001–3010, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher Jones, J.. (1980), Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures, John Wiley & sons, London.Google Scholar
Jagtap, S., Warell, A., Hiort, V., Motte, D. and Larsson, A. (2014), “Design methods and factors influencing their uptake in product development companies: A review”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 2014-Janua, pp. 231–240.Google Scholar
Jänsch, J. and Birkhofer, H. (2004), “The gap between learning and applying design methods”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN.Google Scholar
Kramer, J., Poreh, D. and Agogino, A. (2017), “Using thedesignexchange as a knowledge platform for human-centered design-driven global development”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 1 No. DS87-1, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
Margolin, V. (2010), “Design Research: Towards a History”, in Durling, D., Bousbaci, R., Chen, L., Gauthier, P., Poldma, T., Roworth-Strokes, S. and Stolterman, E. (Eds.), Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, Montreal, Canada, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Mayookh, M. and Srinivasan, V. (2023), “A Review of Repositories of Design Methods”, in Chakrabarti, A. and Singh, V. (Eds.), Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 1. ICORD 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol 343., Springer, Singapore, pp. 1205–1215, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_97.Google Scholar
Cross, N.. (2000), Engineering Design Methods- Strategies for Product Design, 5th ed., Wiley.Google Scholar
Person, O., Daalhuizen, J. and Gattol, V. (2012), “Forming A Mindset: Design Students’ Preconceptions About The Usefulness Of Systematic Methods”, Proceedings Of 14th International Conference On Engineering And Product Design Education, BELGIUM.Google Scholar
Ponn, J. and Lindemann, U. (2006), “CiDaD - A method portal for product development”, 9th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2006, pp. 1221–1228.Google Scholar
Mayookh, M. and Srinivasan, V. (2024), “Research Survey: Perspectives of Design Students”, available at: https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=S1xNYsVFIkGM0ETw-E6UXSq0jspZ1XVJrS4GXEJyX-5UMkpSNTJDSkFNMlRCWDk5RFNKV0FDOFBWMy4u (accessed 15 February 2024).Google Scholar
Vroom, R.W. and Olieman, A.M. (2010), “the Development of an Industrial Design Engineering Wiki : Wikid”, TMCE 2010 Symposium, pp. 1449–1464.Google Scholar
Wallace, K. (2011), “The Future of Design Methodology”, The Future of Design Methodology, pp. 239–248, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access