Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:03:04.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A DIGITAL TWIN BUSINESS MODELLING APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Jakob Trauer ,
Duc Phat Mac ,
Markus Mörtl  and
Markus Zimmermann
Jakob Trauer*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design
Duc Phat Mac
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design
Markus Mörtl
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design
Markus Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design
*
Trauer, Jakob, Technical University of Munich, Germany, jakob.trauer@tum.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Digital Twins are one of the most trending topics. However, there are still open issues in the development of Digital Twins. One of these impediments is formulating a clear and valid value proposition of a Digital Twin. Therefore, this paper presents a novel business modelling approach for Digital Twins. Based on a literature review and an academic case study, different business modelling approaches and techniques were systematically compared, selected and adjusted in order to develop a new framework suitable for describing the value of Digital Twins. It consists of 10 steps – (1) describe a basic development concept of the DT, (2) identify the customer segments, needs and pain points, (3) derive a value proposition (4) identify revenue streams and values created, (5) identify key activities, (6) resources needed, and (7) necessary partners. (8) Adapt the organization to fit the business model and (9) evaluate the cost structure of the project. In the end, document and communicate the new business model (10). Each step is supported by auxiliary methods, tools and procedures. The approach was applied to a scientific case study. In an initial evaluation the overall applicability and usefulness of the approach were confirmed.

Keywords

Digital TwinDigital / Digitised engineering value chainsBusiness models and considerationsCase study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 121 - 130
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

“ADIRO Automatisierungstechnik GmbH - EduKit PA for Festo Didactic” (2022), available at: https://www.adiro.com/en/didactic/hardware/edukit-pa.php (accessed 27 February 2023).Google Scholar
Aheleroff, S., Xu, X., Zhong, R.Y. and Lu, Y. (2021), “Digital Twin as a Service (DTaaS) in Industry 4.0: An Architecture Reference Model”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 47, p. 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, R. and Zimmermann, H.-D. (2001), “Preface: Introduction to Special Section - Business Models”, Electronic Markets, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/713765630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurich, J.C., Koch, W., Kölsch, P. and Herder, C.F. (Eds.) (2019), Entwicklung datenbasierter Produkt-Service Systeme: Ein Ansatz zur Realisierung verfügbarkeitsorientierter Geschäftsmodelle, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59643-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benta, C., Wilberg, J., Hollauer, C. and Omer, M. (2017), “Process model for data-driven business model generation”, in 21st International Conference on Engineering Design.Google Scholar
Bieger, T. and Reinhold, S. (2011), “Das wertbasierte Geschäftsmodell – Ein aktualisierter Strukturierungsansatz”, in Bieger, T., Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. zu and Krys, C. (Eds.), Innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 13–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18068-2_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H. (2010), “Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43 No. 2-3, pp. 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, A., Koch, P., Krastel, M., Schweigert-Recksiek, S. and Trauer, J. (2022), “Ready or not – the Digital Twin is coming! How can companies prepare for it?”, ProductData Journal, 12/2022, pp. 12–17, available at: https://prostep.epaper-pro.org/pdj2-2022_english/#12 (accessed 27 February 2023).Google Scholar
de Kluyver, C.A. (2012), Fundamentals of global strategy, Open textbook library, Saylor Academy; Open Textbook Library, Arlington, Virginia, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Donoghue, I., Hannola, L., Papinniemi, J. and Mikkola, A. (2018), “The Benefits and Impact of Digital Twins in Product Development Phase of PLM”, in Chiabert, P., Bouras, A., Noël, F. and Ríos, J. (Eds.), Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 540, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_40.Google Scholar
Eckert, C., Isaksson, O., Hallstedt, S., Malmqvist, J., Öhrwall Rönnbäck, A. and Panarotto, M. (2019), “Industry Trends to 2040”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2121–2128. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A., Lindemann, U. and Mörtl, M. (2020), Kostengünstig Entwickeln und Konstruieren, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62591-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), “Methodik der Integrierten Produkterstellung im Unternehmen”, in Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (Eds.), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, 6. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Hanser, München, pp. 197–303. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446449084.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K. and Choudury, M. (2014), The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business, 1st ed., FT Publishing International.Google Scholar
Gundlach, C.S. and Fay, A. (2022), “Deduction of Digital Twin's applications based on product independent description of use cases”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, G. (2002), Leading the revolution: How to thrive in turbulent times by making innovation a way of life, Rev. and updated hardcover ed., Harvard Business School Press, [Boston, Mass.].Google Scholar
Jodlbauer, H. (2020), Geschäftsmodelle erarbeiten, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30455-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.W. and Lafley, A.G. (2010), Seizing the white space: Business model innovation for growth and renewal, Harvard Business Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J. and Hicks, B. (2020), “Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review”, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 29, pp. 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampker, A., Stich, V., Jussen, P., Moser, B. and Kuntz, J. (2019), “Business Models for Industrial Smart Services – The Example of a Digital Twin for a Product-Service-System for Potato Harvesting”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 83, pp. 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Leng, J., Akberdina, V. and Kuzmin, E. (2022), Digital Transformation in Industry, Vol. 54, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94617-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudon, K.C. and Traver, C.G. (2014), E-commerce: Business, technology, society, Tenth edition, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Li, X., Cao, J., Liu, Z. and Luo, X. (2020), “Sustainable Business Model Based on Digital Twin Platform Network: The Inspiration from Haier's Case Study in China”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 3, p. 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, J. and Deimler, M. (2013), “Business Model Innovation: When the Game Gets Tough, Change the Game”, in Deimler, M., Lesser, R., Rhodes, D. and Sinha, J. (Eds.), Own the future: 50 ways to win from the Boston Consulting Group, pp. 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204084.ch40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masood, T. and Sonntag, P. (2020), “Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 121, p. 103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massa, L., Tucci, C.L. and Afuah, A. (2017), “A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research”, No. 11(1), pp. 73–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurya, A. (2012), Running lean: Iterate from plan A to a plan that works, The lean series, 2nd ed., O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.Google Scholar
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J. and Mukherjee, N. (2018), “The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation”, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Perno, M., Hvam, L. and Haug, A. (2022), “Implementation of digital twins in the process industry: A systematic literature review of enablers and barriers”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 134, p. 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prielipp, R., Bojko, M., Göhlert, N. and Pelliccia, L. (2021), “Business models based on digital twins and digital shadows in the textile industry”, wt Werkstattstechnik online, Vol. 111 No. 07-08, pp. 531–535. https://doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2021-07-08-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schallmo, D.R. (2014), Kompendium Geschäftsmodell-Innovation, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04459-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. (2012), Geschäftsmodellwandel durch disruptive Innovationen: Fallstudie zum Elektrofahrzeug in Automobilindustrie und Energiewirtschaft, Driesen Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Driesen, Taunusstein.Google Scholar
Schweigert-Recksiek, S., Trauer, J., Engel, C., Spreitzer, K. and Zimmermann, M. (2020), “Conception Of A Digital Twin In Mechanical Engineering – A Case Study In Technical Product Development”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D.J. (2010), “Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43 No. 2-3, pp. 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauer, J., Mutschler, M., Mörtl, M. and Zimmermann, M. (2022), “Challenges in Implementing Digital Twins – a Survey”, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-88786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauer, J., Pfingstl, S., Finsterer, M. and Zimmermann, M. (2021), “Improving Production Efficiency with a Digital Twin Based on Anomaly Detection”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 18, p. 10155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauer, J., Schweigert-Recksiek, S., Engel, C., Spreitzer, K. and Zimmermann, M. (2020a), “What Is A Digital Twin? – Definitions And Insights From An Industrial Case Study In Technical Product Development”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauer, J., Schweigert-Recksiek, S., Onuma Okamoto, L., Spreitzer, K., Mörtl, M. and Zimmermann, M. (2020b), “Data-Driven Engineering – Definitions and Insights from an Industrial Case Study for a New Approach in Technical Product Development”, in Balancing Innovation and operation, 12th - 14th August 2020, The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelpel, S.C., Leibold, M. and Tekie, E.B. (2004), “The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors”, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/1469701042000212669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilberg, J. (2019), “From data to value: facilitating strategy development for connected products”, Doctoral Thesis, Laboratory of Product Development and Lightweight Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 2019.Google Scholar
Wirtz, B.W. (2019), Digital Business Models, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13005-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, B.W. (2020), Business Model Management: Design - Process - Instruments, Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 2nd ed., Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48017-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar