No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
From tears to tiers – architectural principles for federated PLM landscapes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
PLM systems are key enabling systems in the development of today's products. Introduction of a new PLM capability is an expensive and risky undertaking. Many implementation projects end in tears in the sense that they are frequently late or even cancelled. In this paper, a federated PLM architecture pattern – Genesis – is introduced and evaluated against prevalent PLM approaches. From an architecture perspective, Genesis with its two distinct integration tiers decrease the number of integration points and thus cost and complexity.
- Type
- Design Methods and Tools
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Bajaj, M., Zwemer, D., Yntema, R., Phung, A., Kumar, A., Dwivedi, A. and Waikar, M. (2016), MBSE++ — Foundations for Extended Model-Based Systems Engineering Across System Lifecycle. INCOSE International Symposium, 26: 2429–2445. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00304.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleisinger, O., Psota, T., Masior, J., Pfenning, M, Roth, A., Reichwein, A., Hooshmand, Y., Muggeo, C., Hutsch, M. (2022). Killing the PLM Monolith – the Emergence of cloud-native System Lifecycle Management (SysLM), Fraunhofer IESE, Mat 2022, Downloaded from: https://publica-rest.fraunhofer.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/a09d6709-63ad-48de-b819-efad5387c2ab/contentGoogle Scholar
Chadzynski, P.Z., Brown, B. and Willemsen, P. (2018), Enhancing Automated Trade Studies using MBSE, SysML and PLM. INCOSE International Symposium, 28: 1626–1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00572.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-khoury, J. (2020), An Analysis of the OASIS OSLC Integration Standard, for a Cross-disciplinary Integrated Development Environment: Analysis of market penetration, performance and prospects, TRITA-ITM-RP, 978-91-7873-525-9, 2020.Google Scholar
Heliple-2 (2022), Heterogeneous Linked Product Lifecycle Environment – Iteration 2, Vinnova dnr 2022-03032, 2022Google Scholar
Herzog, E., Nordling Larsson, Å. and Tingström, J. (2022), Genesis – an Architectural Pattern for Federated PLM. INCOSE International Symposium, 32: 782-791. https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.12963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooshmand, Y., Resch, J., Wischnewski, P., and Patil, P. (2022). From a Monolithic PLM Landscape to a Federated Domain and Data Mesh. Proceedings of the Design Society, 2, 713-722. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM ELM, Engineering Lifecycle Management, https://www.ibm.com/products/engineering-lifecycle-management, visited 2023-11-07.Google Scholar
OSLC (2023), specification https://open-services.net/specifications/, visited 2023-11-04.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Misra, S. and Chan, F. (2019). Establishment of critical success factors for implementation of product lifecycle management systems, International Journal of Production Research, 58:4, 997-1016, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1605227Google Scholar
Snowden, D. J., and Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, 85(11), 68.Google ScholarPubMed
Sodius-Willert (2023), https://www.sodiuswillert.com/en/solutions/linking-data-oslc, visited 2023-11-07.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access